PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. SERIES “PHILOSOPHY. PSYCHOLOGY. SOCIOLOGY”

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-402-411

Corporate social investment in modern Russia: between economic efficiency and social justice

Irina V. Dolgorukova
Doctor of Sociology, Docent,
Professor of the Department of Sociology

Russian State Social University,
4, Wilhelm Pieck str., Moscow, 129226, Russia;
e-mail: dolgorukovaiv@rgsu.net
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-7116

The paper considers the dilemma faced by modern enterprises competing in the global market. Modern competitive environment provides for the participation of business in social programs. However, this requires enterprises to incur significant additional costs, yielding profits only in the long term. The author asks the question whether modern companies are ready to create systems of corporate social investments to ensure social justice or they can only imitate corporate social responsibility. The author analizes the results of empirical sociological researchs that has been carried out in Russian State Social University in 2011–2016. Base upon these studies the author concludes that corporate social investments give enterprises significant competitive advantages and increase their social reputation. However, if these investments are chaotic and unsystematic it lacks a financial efficiency of the company. So, the purposeful choice of the object of social investment in accordance with the economic interests of the company in the long term are essential. The article will be of interest to company executives, specialists of ministries and departments involved in the development of policies in the field of social entrepreneurship, entrepreneurs, researchers, graduate students and students of higher education institutions, as well as a wide range of readers.

Keywords: corporate social investment, social responsibility, corporate social policy, social justice, economic sociology.

References

Cramer, J. (2003). Learning about corporate social responsibility. The Dutch Experiment. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 153 p.

Dees, J.G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Available at: http://www.redalmarza.cl/ing/pdf/TheMeaningofsocialEntrepreneurship.pdf (accessed 27.07.2016).

Dolgorukova, I.V. (2016). Korporativnaya sotsial’naya politika sovremennogo predpriyatiya: teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy sotsiologicheskogo analiza [Corporate social policy of modern enterprise: theoretical and methodological bases of sociological analysis]. Nauchnaya sotsiologicheskaya shkola RGSU: 25 let. Sotsiologiya. Sotsial’nost’. Sovremennost’: materialy XXI Sotsiologicheskikh chteniy RGSU [Scientific sociological school RSSU: 25 years. Sociology. Sociality. Modernity: Materials of the XXI Sociological Readings RSSU]. Moscow: Perspektiva, pp. 78–80.

Dolgorukova, I.V. (2016). Ustoychivost’ obschestvennykh institutov i korporativnaya sotsial’naya politika: problemy vzaimovliyaniya [The soundness of public institutions and corporate social policy: problems of interaction]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social Policy and Sociology]. Vol. 15, no. 1(114), pp. 35–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17922/2071-3665-2016-15-1-35-44

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. Sep. 13, pp. 122–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14

Gordeev, E.N. and Astakhov, A.P. (2005). Kak organizovat’ effektivnuyu sistemu predotvrascheniya utechki konfidentsial’noy informatsii iz kommercheskoy organizatsii [How to organize an effective system to prevent the leakage of confidential information from a commercial organization]. Moscow, CISA.

Ivanova, N.V. (2013). Sotsial’noe investirovanie: obzor zarubezhnykh praktik [Social investment: overview of international social investment practices]. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Civil Society in Russia and Abroad]. No. 3, pp. 31–36.

Macusita, K. (2010) Missiya biznesa, per. s angl. [Not for bread alone: a business ethos, a management ethic, trans. from Eng.]. Moscow: Al’pina Publ., 191 p.

Moskovskaya, A.A. (ed.) (2011). Sotsial’noe predprinimatel’stvo v Rossii i v mire: praktika i issledovaniya [Social entrepreneurship in Russia and in the world: practice and research]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 284 p.

Nekrasov, Yu.S. (2003). Kollektivnyy dogovor: chto on soboy predstavlyaet? [Collective agreement: what is it?]. Kadrovoe delo [Personnel Affairs]. No. 4, pp. 3–5.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. and Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies. Vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 403–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

Readman, E. (2005). Three models of corporate social responsibility: implications for public policy. Roosvelt Review. Summer, pp. 95–108.

Shulus, A. and Derevyanchenko, A. (2000). O sotsial’nom partnerstve v sfere malogo predprinimatel’stva [About social partnership in small business]. Upravlenie personalom [Personnel Management]. No. 4, pp. 67–80.

Tul’chinskiy, G.L. (2006). Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ (Sotsial’nye investitsii, partnerstvo i kommunikatsii) [Corporate social responsibility (Social investment, partnerships and communications)]. Saint-Petersburg, 106 p.

Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies. No. 43(1), pp. 93–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x

Yudina, T.N., Osadchaya, G.I., Leskova, I.V., Dolgorukova, I.V. and Kireev, E.Y. (2015). The Eurasian economic union: migration risks. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 451–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p451

Received 18.03.2019

For citation:

Dolgorukova I.V. Corporate social investment in modern Russia: between economic efficiency and social justice // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2019. Iss. 3. P. 402–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-402-411