PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. SERIES “PHILOSOPHY. PSYCHOLOGY. SOCIOLOGY”

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-331-344

Self-Other comparative focus in social perception

Milena V. Baleva
Ph.D. in Psychology, Docent, Associate Professor
of the Department of Developmental Psychology

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: milenabaleva@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-3635

Galina V. Kovaleva
Ph.D. in Psychology, Аssociate Professor
of the Department of Humanities

Perm State Institute of Culture,
18, Gazety Zvezda str., Perm, 614000, Russia;
e-mail: gal2401@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-5029

The research deals with the effects of subject- and object-directed perceptual focus on the severity of Self-positivity bias in comparison with a «good» and «bad» person in conditions of different level of perceivable similarity with him/her. It has been hypothesized that a Self-positivity bias is stronger in the case of the subject-directed comparison focus, object’s negative behavioral valency and the low level of perceivable similarity with him/her. The study involved 314 students aged 18 to 30 (M = 20,23, SD = 1,59), 79 males (25 %) and 235 females. At the first stage, the participants filled in the Short Dark Triad Questionnaire (SD3). At the second stage, they watched a video interview with the object, during which he/she answered the questions of the same questionnaire. At the third stage, the participants were asked to evaluate the level of general similarity with the object, their general attitude towards him/her, the degree of certain positive and negative features in his/her character, as well as their own and his/her superiority in these features. The characters of the interviews were 2 (male and female) students, educated in dramatic acting. During the interview, they answered the SD3 questions in accordance with the key, playing the role of «good» and «bad» person. Statistical analyses included Student’s t-test and two-way ANOVA (repeated measurement method, mixed design). It was found that comparison focus was a key implicit factor in strengthening and weakening Self-positivity bias. With subject-directed focus bias increased, and with object-directed focus it decreased. The positive behavioral valency of the object (the image of the «good Other») provoked a cognitive conflict of perception, which was manifested in the statement of equal superiority over him/her both in negative and in positive features. The awareness of high similarity with the object did not weaken the Self-positivity bias, which can be considered as evidence in favor of the weak influence of conscious regulation on the process of social perception.

Keywords: social perception, comparison focus, relation to the Other, upward and downward comparison, object’s valency, similarity with the object.

References

Alicke, M.D., Klotz, M.L., Breitenbecher, D.L., Yurak, T.J. and Vredenburg, D.S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 804–825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804

Cheprakova, E.A. (2011). Ustoychivye formy agressii u sovremennykh podrostkov: rezul’taty longityudnogo issledovaniya [Stable forms of aggression among modern adolescents: results of a longitudinal research]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. No. 3, pp. 141–150.

Collins, R.L. (2000). Among the better ones: Upward assimilation in social comparison. Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research, ed. by J. Suls, L. Wheeler. New York: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Press Publishers, pp. 141–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_9

Conrey, F.R., Sherman, J.W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K. and Groom, C.J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 89, pp. 469–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469

Crosby, F., Bromley, S. and Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 87, pp. 546–563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.546

Devine, P.G. and Elliot, A.J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 21, pp. 1139–1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111002

Egorova, M.S., Sitnikova, M.A. and Parshikova, O.V. (2015). Adaptatsiya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoy triady [Adaptation of the Sort Dark triad]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. Vol. 8, no. 43. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n43/1181-egorova43.html (accessed 12.03.2019).

Eiser, J.R., Pahl, S. and Prins, Y.R.A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 37, pp. 77–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1438

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. Vol. 7, pp. 117–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Hoorens, V. (1995). Self-favoring biases, self-presentation, and the self-other asymmetry in social comparison. Journal of Personality. Vol. 63, pp. 793–817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00317.x

Houston, M.A., Apsche, J.A. and Bass, C.K. (2007). A comprehensive literature review of Mode Deactivation Therapy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy. Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 271–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100804

Ito, T.A., Friedman, N.P., Bartholow, B.D., Correll, J. et al. (2015). Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 187–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038557

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 108, pp. 480–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review. Vol. 110, pp. 472–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.472

Mussweiler, T. and Strack, F. (2000). Consequences of social comparison: Selective accessibility, assimilation, and contrast. Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research, ed. by J. Suls, L. Wheeler. New York: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Press Publ., pp. 253–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_13

Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review. Vol. 84, pp. 231–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496398-13

Pahl, S. and Eiser, J.R. (2005). Valence, comparison focus and self-positivity biases: Does it matter whether people judge positive or negative traits? Experimental Psychology. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 303–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.303

Panchekhina, N.N. (2010). Svyaz’ agressivnosti lichnosti i osobennostey sotsial’noy pertseptsii [Relationship of aggressiveness of personality and features of social perception]. Lichnost’ v prirode i obschestve, pod red. A.V. Ivaschenko, A.V. Gagarina [Personality in nature and society, ed. by A.V. Ivaschenko and A.V. Gagarin]. Moscow: RUDN Publ., pp. 71‒73.

Payne, B.K. (2005). Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive control modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 89, pp. 488–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.488

Payne, B.K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 81, pp. 181–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181

Schebetenko, S.A., Baleva, M.V. and Kornienko, D.S. (2007). Stereotip i sotsial’naya ugroza kak faktory vospriyatiya immigrantov russkimi [Stereotype and social threat as factors of Russian perception of immigrants]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta iskusstva i kul’tury [Bulletin of the Perm State Institute of Art and Culture]. Vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 57–69.

Wills, T.A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 90, pp. 245–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245

Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist. Vol. 35, pp. 151–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151

Zárate, M.A., Stoever, C.J., MacLin, M.K. and Arms-Chavez, C.J. (2008). Neurocognitive underpinnings of face perception: Further evidence of distinct person and group perception processes. Journal of personality and social psychology. Vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 108‒115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.108

Zelli, A., Dodge, K.A., Lochman, J.E., Laird, R.D. and Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). The distinction between beliefs legitimizing aggression and deviant processing of social cues: Testing measurement validity and the hypothesis that biased processing mediates the effects of beliefs on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 150–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.150

Received 01.08.2019

For citation:

Baleva M.V., Kovaleva G.V. Self-Other comparative focus in social perception // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2019. Iss. 3. P. 331–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-331-344