DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-562-572
An integrated approach to examine of labour productivity: actual state and perspectives of research*
Dmitry V. Pishchalnikov
MBA, Director-General
PJSC «Krasnkokamsk Metal Mesh Works»,
23, Shosseynaya str., Krasnokamsk, Perm Krai, 617060, Russia;
e-mail: dmitr008@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-4306
Yulia L. Nyrkova
Head of Human Resources Division
PJSC «Krasnkokamsk Metal Mesh Works»,
23, Shosseynaya str., Krasnokamsk, Perm Krai,617060, Russia;
e-mail: nyrkova-yl@rosset-kzms.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5459-2334
Natalya A. Rudnova
Assistant of the Department of General and Clinical Psychology
Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: chernysheva-n.a@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2063-2892
Lidiya V. Sokruta
Assistant of the Department of Sociology
Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: lidiya_sokruta94@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-7079
Alexander Yu. Vnutskih
Doctor of Philosophy, Docent,
Professor of the Department of Philosophy
Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: avnut@inbox.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4162-1033
The problem of low labour productivity is a «chronic» problem for Russia. At the same time, some Russian enterprises increase productivity successfully implementimg to the «rational model of labor relations» implementation. The authors assume that the problem of increasing labour productivity is transdisciplinary, and psychology of personality and social psychology should play a significant role in finding the solution to this problem. The working hypothesis of this research is that there are statistically significant differences in personality traits and professional motivation that determine the specific style of activity of employees of enterprises with different labour productivity. In order to test this hypothesis the authors did a study in the summer–autumn of 2018 at two industrial enterprises of the Perm Krai. The study has showed that there are practically no significant differences between the personality traits of the employees who work at the enterprises, and the levels of labour productivity. The only exception is the factor «Openness to Experience» that makes a distinction between the employees of enterprises which might be attributed to specificity of the production processes at these two plants and also to specificity of the sample. It is possible that absence of significant differences between the personality traits of the employees of these enterprises evidences that labour productivity is mainly determined by specific social ties in professional groups. So, the first version of the working hypothesis is not confirmed. It is possible that assignment of roles and responsibilities, as well as the styles of communication and administration are the predictors of labour productivity.
Keywords: psychology of work, labour productivity, Perm Krai, rational model of employment relations, individual style of activity, personality traitsof employees.
References
Allport, G.W. (1955). Becoming: basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven: Yale University Press, 115 p.
AMI Sistema [AMI-System]. Available at: http://www.ami-system.ru (accessed 01.09.2018).
Ashton, M.C. and Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Vol. 11, pp. 150–166.
Daydzhest Ekspertnogo soveta po effektivnomu upravleniyu i povysheniyu proizvoditelnosti truda 15 oktyabrya 2018 g. (2018) [Digest of the Expert Council on effective management and productivity 15 October 2018]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennaya Duma Publ., 10 p.
Egorova, M.S. and Parshikova, O.V. (2017). Issledovanie struktury faktora Chestnos, Skromnost iz shestifaktornogo oprosnika lichnosti HEXACO [The structure of Honesty-Humility factor]. PsikhologicheskieIssledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. Vol. 10, no. 56. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2017v10n56/1507-egorova56.html (accessed 25.06.2018).
Fukin, A.I. (2000). Psikhologiya konveyernogo truda [Psychology of conveyor labor]. Moscow: PER SE Publ., 377 p.
Il’in, E.P. (2008). Differentsialnaya psikhologiya professionalnoy deyatelnosti [Differential psychology of professional activity]. St. Petersburg: Peter Publ., 432 p.
Kuranchie-Mensah, E.B. and Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2016). Employee motivation and work performance: a comparative study of mining companies in Ghana. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. Iss. 9(2), pp. 255–309.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1975). Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 304 p.
Lomov, B.F. (1984). Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problem psikhologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 444 p.
O natsionalnykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2024 goda (2018) [About national goals and strategic objectives of development of the Russian Federation for the period till 2024]. Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57425 (accessed 25.06.2018).
Ono, T. (2008). Proizvodstvennaya sistema Toyoty: ukhodya ot massovogo proizvodstva [Toyota Production System]. Moscow: Institute for complex strategic studies Publ., 208 p.
Osin, E., Gorbunova, A.A., et al. (2017). Professionalnaya motivatsiya sotrudnikov rossiyskikh predpriyatiy: diagnostika i svyazi s blagopoluchiyem i uspeshnostyu deyatelnosti [Professional motivation of Russian employees: assessment and associations with well-being and performance]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology]. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 21–49.
Permskiy kray v tsifrakh. 2018: Kratkiy statisticheskiy sbornik (2018) [Perm Krai in numbers. 2018: Brief statistic compilation]. Perm: Rosstat Publ., 181 p.
Realnaya inflyatsiya v Rossii: ispravlenie «krivykh zerkal» Rosstata (2017) [Real inflation in Russia: correction of Rosstat’s distorting mirrors]. Available at: http://ktovkurse.com/a-vy-kurse/realnaya-inflyatsiya-v-rossii-ispravlenie-krivyh-zerkal-rosstata (accessed 01.10.2018).
Soloschenko, E.A. and Saklakov, V.M. (2011). Effektivnaya sistema motivatsii: zhelaemyy rezultat i vozmozhnye oshibki [Effective system of motivation: the desired result and possible errors]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Tomsk State University Journal of Economics]. No. 1(13), pp. 90–95.
Tolochek, V.A. (2015). Stili deyatelnosti: resursniy podkhod [Activity styles: resource approach]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 366 p.
Tolochek, V.A. (2000). Stili professionalnoy deyatelnosti [Professional styles]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 199 p.
Vnutskikh, A.Yu., Sokruta, L.V. and Pishchal’nikov, D.V. (2015). Povyshenie proizvoditelnosti truda kak mezhdistsiplinarnaya problema: istoricheskaya retrospektiva [Increasing of labor productivity as an interdisciplinary problem: historical retrospective]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Psikhologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy.Psychology.Sociology»]. No. 4, pp. 132–142.
Zakharov, A.N. (2013). Problemy motivatsii i proizvoditelnosti truda rabotnikov selskogo khozyaystva [The problem of motivation and productivity of agricultural workers]. Vestnik NGIEI [Herald NGIEI]. No. 7(26), pp. 51–62.
Received 01.10.2018
For citation:
Pishchalnikov D.V., Nyrkova Yu.L., Rudnova N.A., Sokruta L.V., Vnutskih A.Yu. An integrated approach to examine of labour productivity: actual state and perspektives of research // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 4. P. 562–572. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-562-572
* Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Пермского края в рамках научного проекта № 18-413-590009.