DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2019-1-29-43

Degradation of Soviet Marxism through the example of philosophy and methodology of history of the second half of the 20th century

Vyacheslav V. Koryakin
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: vvkorkfnpsu@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-3614

In the second half of the 20th century, the Soviet humanities faced crisis of their philosophical foundations — the materialist understanding of history. In epistemological terms, it was caused by the discovered heuristic limits of the abstract-universal materialist theory, which describes the general in the development of reality but eliminates all the diversity of the particular in it. Over time, there emerged two interrelated trends within this crisis — the gradual formulation of the concrete-universal theory, which describes both the general and (in a generalized form) the whole diversity of the particular in development, and the degradation of the abstract-universal theory. The disintegration of the abstract-universal theory has become the dominant trend. It manifested itself in the fact that, recognizing that the general provisions of materialism were true in principle, most Soviet authors began to depart from them when analyzing specific historical phenomena. It was concluded that in a particular situation, social being does not always determine social consciousness, the basis does not always determine the superstructure, material production does not always determine political life and culture. At the same time, there was a rejection of dialectics, an integral part of Marxism. The opinion was often expressed about the equivalence of opposites in their unity and relativity of those parties that were recognized as absolute in traditional Marxism. Such theoretical conclusions resulted in the rejection of historical materialism and transition of the overwhelming majority of the national humanities representatives to the positions of pre-marxist and non-classical philosophy.

Keywords: materialistic understanding of history, Soviet Marxism, dialectics, historical process.

References

Barg, M.A. (1984). Kategorii i metody istoricheskoy nauki [Categories and methods of historical science]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 315 p.

Barg, M.A. and Chernyak, E.B. (1979). Istoricheskie struktury i istoricheskie zakony [Historical structures and historical laws]. Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B. and Pavlov, V.I. Teoreticheskiye problemy vsemirno-istoricheskogo protsessa [Zhukov, E.M., Barg, M.A., Chernyak, E.B. and Pavlov, V.I. Theoretical problems of the world-historical process]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 330 p.

Chernyak, E.B. (1993). Tsivilizatsii i revolyutsii [Civilizations and Revolutions]. Tsivilizatsii [Civilizations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 2, pp. 70–93.

Danilova, L.V. (1968). Diskussionnye problemy teorii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv [Discussion problems of the theory of pre-capitalist societies]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv [Problems of history of pre-capitalist societies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 1, pp. 27–35.

Engels, F. (1965). Pis’mo I. Blokhu [Letter to I. Bloch]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 37. pp. 393–397.

Engels, F. (1966). Pis’mo V. Borgiusu [Letter to V. Borgius]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 39, pp. 174–177.

Engels, F. (1966). Pis’mo F. Meringu [Letter to F. Mering]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 39, pp. 56–57.

Engels, F. (1965). Pis’mo K. Shmidtu [Letter to K. Schmidt]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 37, p. 414–422.

Fedoseyev, P. and Frantsev, Yu. (1964). Istoriya i sotsiologiya [History and Sociology]. Kommunist [Communist]. No. 2.

Gulyga, A.V. (1964). O predmete istoricheskoy nauki [On the subject of historical science]. Voprosy istorii. No. 4, pp. 20–31.

Gurevich, A.Ya. (1965). Obschiy zakon i konkretnaya zakonomernost’ v istorii [General law and specific pattern in history]. Voprosy istorii. No. 8, pp. 14–30.

Izraitel’, V.Ya. (1975). Problemy formatsionnogo analiza obschestvennogo razvitiya [Problems of Formation Analysis of Social Development]. Gorkiy: Volgo-Vyatka book Publ., 191 p.

Kelle, V.Zh. and Kovalzon, M.Ya. (1981). Teoriya i istoriya [Theory and History]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 290 p.

Kovalev, A.M. (1996). Esche raz o formatsionnom i tsivilizatsionnom podkhodakh [Once again abot the formational and civilization approaches]. Obschestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 1, pp. 97–104.

Kolesnitskiy, N.F. (1968). K voprosu o ranneklassovykh obschestvennykh strukturakh [On the issue of early class social structures]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv [Problems of history of pre-capitalist societies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 1, pp. 610–625.

Lapin, N.I. (1991). O mnogomernosti istorii [On the multidimensionality of history]. Sotsialnaya filosofiya v kontse XX veka [Social philosophy at the end of the XXth century]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., pp. 108–117.

Lysmankin, E. (1969). Razvitie V.I. Leninym ucheniya ob obschestvenno-ekonomicheskoy formatsii [Development of V.I. Lenin’s doctrine of socio-economic formations]. V.I. Lenin kak filosof [V.I. Lenin as a philosopher]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., pp. 150–165.

Marx, K. (1959). Predislovie k kritike politicheskoy ekonomii. Vvedeniye [Preface to criticism of political economy. Introduction]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 13, pp. 5–13.

Marx, K. (1978). Ekonomicheskiye rukopisi 1857–1859 gg. [Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 46, pt. 1, 614 p.

Meyman, M.N. and Skazkin, S.D. (1960). K voprosu o neposredstvennom perekhode k feodalizmu na osnove razlozheniya pervobytno-obschinnogo sposoba proizvodstva [On the issue of direct transition to feudalism on the basis of the decomposition of the primitive communal mode of production]. Voprosy istorii. No. 1, pp. 64–69.

Mogilnitskiy, B.G. (1989). Vvedeniye v metodologiyu istorii [Introduction to the methodology of history]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 175 p.

Mogilnitskiy, B.G. (1986). O spetsificheskikh istoricheskikh zakonakh [About specific historical laws]. Metodologicheskiye i istoricheskiye voprosy istoricheskoy nauki [Methodological and Historical Issues of Historical Science]. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press Publ., pp. 6–31.

Momdzhyan, K.Kh. (1991). Marx i sovremennaya istoriya [Marx and modern history]. Sotsialnaya filosofiya v kontse XX veka [Social philosophy at the end of the 20th century]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., pp. 140–148.

Neronova, V.D. (1992). Formy ekspluatatsii v drevnem mire v zerkale sovetskoy istoriografii [Forms of exploitation in the ancient world in the mirror of soviet historiography]. Perm: Perm State University Publ., 311 p.

Ob itogakh diskussii o periodizatsii istorii SSSR (1951). [On the outcome of the discussion on the periodization of the history of the USSR]. Voprosy istorii. No. 3, pp. 15–19.

Razin, V.I. (1979). Marksistsko-leninskoye uchenie ob obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiyakh i sovremennost [Marxist-Leninist doctrine of socio-economic formations and modernity]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., 245 p.

Rozhin, V.P. (1962). Vvedenie v marksistskuyu sotsiologiyu [Introduction to Marxist Sociology]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publ., 159 p.

Rozhin, V., Tugarinov, V and Chagin, B. (eds.) (1964). Marksistsko-leninskaya filosofiya [Marxist-Leninist philosophy]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 512 p.

Santsevich, A.V. (1990). Metodika istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Methods of historical research]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka Publ., 196 p.

Shtayerman, E.M. (1968). Antichnoe obschestvo. Modernizatsiya istorii i istoricheskie analogii [Antique society. Modernization of history and historical analogies]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv [Problems of the history of pre-capitalist societies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 1, pp. 626–635.

Vasil’ev, L.S. (1994). Istoriya Vostoka [Eastern history]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., vol. 1, 495 p.

Vasil’ev, L.S. (1968). Sotsialnaya struktura i dinamika drevnekitayskogo obschestva [Social structure and dynamics of ancient Chinese society]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv [Problems of history of pre-capitalist societies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 1, pp. 455–515.

Vasil’ev, L.S. (1995). Tsivilizatsiya Vostoka: spetsifika, tendentsii, perspektivy [Civilization of the East: specifics, trends, prospects]. Tsivilizatsii [Civilizations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 3, pp. 121–130.

Vasil’ev, L.S. and Stuchevskiy, I.A. (1966). Tri modeli vozniknoveniya i evolyutsii dokapitalisticheskikh obschestv (k probleme «aziatskogo» sposoba proizvodstva) [Three models of the emergence and evolution of pre-capitalist societies (to the problem of the «Asian» mode of production)]. Voprosy istorii. No. 5, pp. 84–90.

Yushkov, S.V. (1946). K voprosu o dofeodalnom («varvarskom») gosudarstve [On the issue of the pre-feudal («barbaric») state]. Voprosy istorii. No. 7, pp. 28–37.

Yuschenko, Yu. A. (1991). K voprosu o tipologii i napravlennosti istoricheskogo protsessa [On the issue of typology and orientation of the historical process]. Sotsialnaya filosofiya v kontse XX veka [Social philosophy at the end of the twentieth century] Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., pp. 223–230.

Zhukov, E.M. (1964). Istoricheskaya nauka i obschaya metodologiya [Historical science and general methodology]. Metodologicheskie problemy nauki [Methodological problems of science]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 218–231.

Zhukov, E.M. (1975). Nekotoryye voprosy teorii obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Some questions of the theory of socio-economic formations]. Problemy sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 10–19.

Zhukov, E.M. (1987). Ocherki metodologii istorii [Essay history methodology]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 256 p.

Zhukov, E.M. (1979). Sotsiologicheskie i istoricheskie zakony [Sociological and historical laws]. Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B. and Pavlov, V.I. Teoreticheskiye problemy vsemirno-istoricheskogo protsessa [Zhukov, E.M., Barg, M.A., Chernyak, E.B. and Pavlov, V.I. Theoretical problems of the world-historical process]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 330 p.

Received 10.01.2019

For citation:

Koryakin V.V. Degradation of Soviet Marxism through the example of philosophy and methodology of history of the second half of the 20th century // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2019. Iss. 1. P. 29–43. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2019-1-29-43