DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-203-214
Formation synthesis. Revisiting the old problem
Vyacheslav V. Koryakin
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy
Perm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: vvkorkfnpsu@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-3614
The key problem of social development is the unity and diversity of its staged transitions. Marxist literature of the second half of the 20th century tried to solve this issue within the framework of the formation synthesis concept. A concrete embodiment of this concept was implemented in medieval studies within the feudal synthesis concept. However, historical materialism largely gravitated to the abstract universal dialectic plan of historical reality analysis in which the description and explanation of the general in development was accompanied by a diminution of attention to the specific variety of the special in it. The excessive use of abstract-universal theory created a number of significant difficulties in the concrete analysis of the historical process, including difficulties in the analysis of specific transitions to a new formation. It is noteworthy that the variety of social development stages as a whole was described to the detriment of the diversity of individual societies, and vice versa. At the same time, empirical and conceptual generalizations were made in Soviet Marxism, which made it possible to go to the level of a concrete universal dialectic analysis of the historical process. In particular, it became possible to describe the formation transition as a process of the mutual transformation of the production methods of societies at different stages of development, which in turn made it possible to reveal the unity of the staged and synchronous diversity of historical reality.
Keywords: historical process, socio-economic formation, formation synthesis, historical law, unity and diversity of history, center and periphery.
References
Barg, M.A. (1984). Kategorii i metody istoricheskoy nauki [Categories and methods of historical science]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 315 p.
Barg, M.A. (1970). Uchenie ob obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiyakh i konkretnyy analiz istoricheskogo protsessa [The doctrine of socio-economic formations and a concrete analysis of the historical process]. Ocherki metodologii poznaniya sotsial’nykh yavleniy, pod red. D.M. Ugrinovicha, O.V. Larmina, A.K. Uledova [Essays on the methodology of cognition of social phenomena, ed. by D.M. Ugrinovich, O.V. Larmin, A.K. Uledov]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 249–298.
Barg, M.A. and Chernyak, E.B. (1979). Istoricheskie struktury i istoricheskie zakony [Historical structures and historical laws]. Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B., Pavlov V.I. Teoreticheskie problemy vsemirno-istoricheskogo protsessa [Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B., Pavlov V.I. Theoretical problems of the world historical process]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 75–132.
Barg, M.A. and Chernyak, E.B. (1975). Region kak kategoriya vnutrenney tipologii klassovo-antagonisticheskikh formatsiy [Region as a category of internal typology of class-antagonistic formations]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 40–77.
Eliseyeva, S.A. (1969). K voprosu o vozmozhnosti vypadeniya nekotorykh obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy v istorii otdel’nykh narodov [To the question of the possibility of the loss of certain socio-economic formations in the history of individual peoples]. Voprosy istoricheskogo materializma i kritika nekotorykh kontseptsiy burzhuaznoy sotsiologii [Questions of historical materialism and criticism of certain concepts of bourgeois sociology]. Moscow: MSU Publ., pp. 105–113.
Engels, F. (1965). Pis’mo I. Blokhu, 21 sentyabrya 1890 g. [Letter to J. Bloch, September 21–22, 1880]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 37, pp. 393–397.
Ershov, Yu.G. (1990). Chelovek, sotsium, istoriya [Person, society, history]. Sverdlovsk: UrSU Publ., 151 p.
Farkhiyev, R.D. (1978). O posledovatel’noy smene obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy i ee svoeobrazii v istorii otdel’nykh stran i narodov [On the consistent change in socio-economic formations and its identity in the history of individual countries and peoples]. Dialektika obschego i osobennogo v istoricheskom protsesse [Dialectics of the general and the special in the historical process]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 60–65.
Glezerman, G.E. (1978). Obschestvenno-ekonomicheskaya formatsiya — uzlovaya kategoriya istoricheskogo materializma [Socio-economic formation — a main category of historical materialism]. Obschestvenno-ekonomicheskie formatsii, problemy teorii [Socio-economic formations, problems of theory]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 7–33.
Gutnova, E.V. (1995). Soslovno-predstavitel’nye sobraniya srednikh vekov v istorii evropeyskoy tsivilizatsii [Class-representative collections of the Middle Ages in the history of European civilization]. Tsivilizatsii [Civilizations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., iss. 3, pp. 202–209.
Gutnova, E.V. (1993). Vozmozhen li i nuzhen li sintez v istorii [Is synthesis possible and necessary in history?]. Sredniye veka [Middle Ages]. Iss. 56, pp. 284–289.
Gutnova, E.V. and Udal’tsova, Z.V. (1975). K voprosu i tipologii razvitogo feodalizma v Zapadnoy Evrope [On the issue and typology of developed feudalism in Western Europe]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 107–123.
Ilyushechkin, V.P. (1987). O zakonakh stadial’nosti i neravnomernosti obschestvennogo razvitiya [About the laws of stadiness and unevenness of social development]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 3, pp. 34–42.
Istoriya Evropy. T. 2: Srednevekovaya Evropa (1992) [The history of Europe. Vol. 2: Medieval Europe]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 808 p.
Itogi i zadachi izucheniya genezisa feodalizma v Zapadnoy Evrope: nauchnaya sessiya, Moskva, 30 maya – 3 iyunya 1966 g.: tezisy dokladov (1966) [Results and tasks of studying the genesis of feudalism in Western Europe: Scientific session, Moscow, May 30 – June 3, 1966: abstracts]. Moscow, 30 p.
Korolyuk, V.D. (1975). Osnovnyye problemy formirovaniya kontaktnoy zony v Yugo-Vostochnoy Evrope i bessinteznogo regiona v Vostochnoy i Tsentral’noy Evrope [The main problems of the formation of the contact zone in South-Eastern Europe and the synthesis-free region in Eastern and Central Europe]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 158–184.
Korsunskiy, A.R. and Gyunter, R. (1984). Upadok i gibel’ Zapadnoy Rimskoy imperii i vozniknovenie germanskikh korolevstv [The decline and death of the Western Roman Empire and the emergence of German kingdoms]. Moscow: MSU Publ., 258 p.
Koryakin, V.V. (2019). Degradatsiya sovetskogo marksizma na primere filosofii i metodologii istorii vtoroy poloviny XX veka [Degradation of soviet Marxism through the example of philosophy and methodology of history of the second half of the 20th century]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology]. Iss. 1, pp. 29–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-1-29-43
Koryakin, V.V. (2008). Trud i edinyy zakonomernyy istoricheskiy protsess [Labor and a single natural historical process.]. Perm, pt. 2, 340 p.
Koryakin, V.V. (1998). Zakonomernosti «optimumov» i «maksimumov» v istorii [Patterns of «optimums» and «maximums» in history]. Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy]. Perm: PSU Publ., iss. 7, pp. 206–210.
Kozlova, M.G., Sedov, L.A. and Tyurin, V.A. (1968). Tipy ranneklassovykh gosudarstv v Yugo-Vostochnoy Azii [Types of Early Class States in Southeast Asia]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Problems of the history of pre-capitalist society]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., book 1, pp. 516–545.
Iz rukopisnogo nasledstva K. Marksa (1958). [From the handwritten heritage of K. Marx]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 12, pp. 709–738.
Lenin, V.I. (1969). O lozunge Soedinennykh Shtatov Evropy [On the slogan for a United States of Europe]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Lenin V.I. Collected works]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 26. pp. 351–355.
Lyublinskaya, A.D. (1968). Tipologiya rannego feodalizma v Zapadnoy Evrope i problema romano-germanskogo sinteza [The typology of early feudalism in Western Europe and the problem of Romano-German synthesis]. Sredniye veka [Middle Ages]. Iss. 31, pp. 9–17.
Masson, V.M. (1983). Leninskie idei o neravnomernosti istoricheskogo protsessa i problemy istorii drevnego mira [Lenin’s ideas about the unevenness of the historical process and the problems of the history of the ancient world]. Metodologicheskie i filosofskie problemy istorii [Methodological and philosophical problems of history]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., pp. 7–15.
Novosel’tsev, A.P., Pashuto, V.G. and Cherepnin L.V. (1972). Puti razvitiya feodalizma [The development of feudalism]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 338 p.
Pershits, A.I. and Khazanov, A.M. (eds.) (1978). Pervobytnaya periferiya klassovykh obschestv do nachala Velikikh geograficheskikh otkrytiy [The primitive periphery of class societies before the start of the great geographical discoveries]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 301 p.
Pletnikov, Yu.K., Semenov, Yu.I. and Grigor’yan, B.T. et al. (eds.) (1981). Marksistsko-leninskaya teoriya istoricheskogo protsessa: deystvitelnost’, material’naya osnova, pervichnoe i vtorichnoe [The Marxist-Leninist theory of the historical process: The historical process: reality, material basis, primary and secondary]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 463 p.
Porshnev, B.F. (1975). Rol’ sotsial’nykh revolyutsiy v smene formatsiy [The role of social revolutions in the change of formations]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 26–40.
Semenov, Yu.I. (1998). Marksova teoriya obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy i sovremennost’ [Marx’s theory of socio-economic formations and modernity]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3, pp. 190–233.
Semenov, Yu.I. (1978). Teoriya obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy i vsemirnaya istoriya [The theory of socio-economic formations and world history]. Obschestvenno-ekonomicheskie formatsii: problemy teorii [Socio-economic formations: problems of theory]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 55–89.
Udal’tsova, Z.V. (1975). Problemy tipologii feodalizma v Vizantii [Problems of the typology of feudalism in Byzantium]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 124–157.
Udal’tsova, Z.V. (1983). Tipologiya kul’tury kak metodologicheskaya problema (na primere istorii Vizantii) [Typology of culture as a methodological problem]. Metodologicheskiye i filosofskiye problemy istorii [Methodological and philosophical problems of history]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., pp. 127–151.
Vasil’ev, L.S. (1968). Sotsial’naya struktura i dinamika drevnekitayskogo obschestva [The social structure and dynamics of ancient Chinese society]. Problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskikh obshchestv [Problems of the history of pre-capitalist society]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., book 1, pp. 455–515.
Vil’chek, V. (1993). Proschanie s Marksom [Farewell to Marx]. Moscow: Progress–Kul’tura Publ., 224 p.
Zhukov, E.M. (1978). Metodologicheskie problemy teorii obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Methodological problems of the theory of socio-economic formations]. Obshchestvenno-ekonomicheskiye formatsii, problemy teorii [Socio-economic formations, problems of theory]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 34–54.
Zhukov, E.M. (1975). Nekotorye voprosy teorii obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Some questions of the theory of socio-economic formations]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy [Problems of socio-economic formations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 11–25.
Zhukov, E.M. (1979). Sotsiologicheskie i istoricheskie zakony [Sociological and historical laws]. Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B., Pavlov V.I. Teoreticheskie problemy vsemirno-istoricheskogo protsessa [Zhukov E.M., Barg M.A., Chernyak E.B., Pavlov V.I. Theoretical problems of the world historical process]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 11–47.
Received 23.04.2020
For citation:
Koryakin V.V. [Formation synthesis. Revisiting the old problem]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 2, pp. 203–214 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-203-214