PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. SERIES “PHILOSOPHY. PSYCHOLOGY. SOCIOLOGY”

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-395-403

Culture infantilism and demonization of being (concerning clarification of M.K. Mamardashvili’s heroic art project)

Alexander V. Polyakov
Αssistant of the Department of Philosophy,
Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov,
77, Politekhnicheskaya st., Saratov, 410054, Russia;

Ph.D. Student of the Department of Theoretical and Social Philosophy,
Saratov State University,
83, Astrakhanskaya st., Saratov, 410012, Russia;

e-mail: waywomaki@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-9625

In this article, the author analyzes the contraposition between infantile consciousness and «heroic art» used by Merab Mamardashvili. Examining the phenomenon of infantile consciousness, the author discovers a number of principles underlying it. Studying how these principles give rise to areas of absent life experience (from the side of thinking or from the side of feeling), the author indicates how another principle grows out of it — the «unknowability of being» or «demonization of being». Under such conditions, a person performs an evaluation procedure instead of stating the inconceivability of a situation and the self-determination procedure (the inconceivability of a situation is evaluated negatively and is fixed in thinking in this way). Using these conclusions, the author describes a situation in which «heroism» is understood as something alien to the meanings Mamardashvili endowed the «heroic art» idea with. The alienness shows itself in the way «heroism» is expressed as defense against the «unknowability of being». The author draws attention to the principle of ratio, important to Merab Mamardashvili, which consists in maintaining the final apodictic form between the two poles — the unknowable in sensory experience and the unknowable in thinking. With the help of this principle, the meaning of Mamardashvili’s statements about «heroic art» is clarified.

Keywords: Mamardashvili, infantilism, heroic art, philosophy of cruelty, Descartes, Kant, Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns, reality, possibility, time, being.

References

Bibler, V.S. (1975). Myshlenie kak tvorchestvo (vvedenie v logiku myslennogo dialoga) [Thinking as creativity (introduction to the logic of mental dialogue)]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 399 p.

Dmitriev, T.A. (2007). Problema metodicheskogo somneniya v filisofii Rene Dekarta [The problem of methodological doubt in the Rene Descartes philosophy]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 231 p.

Gaydenko, P.P. (1963). Ekzistentsializm i problema kul’tury [Existentialism and the problem of culture]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 120 p.

Hartmann, N. (2003). K osnovopolozheniyu ontologii [Ontology: Laying the foundations]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 640 p.

Heidegger, M. (2007). Pis’mo o gumanizme [Letter on humanism]. Vremya i bytie: Stat’i i vystupleniya. Per. s nem. V.V. Bibikhina [Time and being: articles and speeches. Trans. from Germ. by V.V. Bibikhin]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 266–306.

Hinske, N. (2007). Mezhdu prosvescheniem i kritikoy razuma: etyudy o korpuse logicheskikh rabot Kanta [Between enlightenment and criticism of the mind: studies on Kant’s case of logical works]. Moscow: Kul’turnaya Revolyutsiya Publ., 296 p.

Kant, I (1994). Kritika chistogo razuma. Per. s nem. N.O. Losskogo [Critique of pure reason. Trans. from Germ. by N.O. Lossky]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 591 p.

Kant, I (2006). Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya [Critique of judgment]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 512 p.

Losev, A.F. and Taho-Godi, A.A. (1993). Primechaniya [Notes]. Platon. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t. T. 2 [Plato. Collected works: in 4 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 413–509.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2011). Formy i soderzhanie myshleniya [Forms and substance of thinking]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka Publ., 284 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1993). Kartezianskie razmyshleniya [Cartesian reflections]. Moscow: Progress–Kul’tura Publ., 352 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2014). Lektsii po antichnoy filosofii [Lectures on ancient philosophy]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka Publ., 256 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1996). Neobkhodimost’ sebya [Necessity of self]. Moscow: Labirint Publ., 432 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2017). Ocherk sovremennoy evropeyskoy filosofii [Essay on modern European philosophy]. Moscow: Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ, 512 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2014). Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti [Psychological topology of the way]. Moscow: Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ., vol. 2, 1282 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2014). Soznanie i tsivilizatsiya: Vystupleniya i doklady [Consciousness and civilization: Speeches and reports]. Saint Petersburg: Lenizdat Publ., 384 p.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (2012). Vil’nusskie lektsii po sotsial’noy filosofii (Opyt fizicheskoy metafiziki) [Vilnius lectures on social philosophy (The experience of physical metaphysics)]. Saint Petersburg:Azbuka Publ., 320 p.

Sartre, J.-P. (1990). Ekzistentsializm — eto gumanizm. Per. s fr. [Existentialism is a humanism. Trans from French]. Sumerki bogov, sost. i obsch. red. A.A. Yakovleva [Twilight of the gods, ed. by A.A. Yakovlev]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., pp. 319–345.

 

Received 23.06.2020

For citation:

Polyakov A.V. [Culture infantilism and demonization of being (concerning clarification of M.K. Mamardashvili’s heroic art project)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 3, pp. 395–403 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-395-403