DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-106-117

The role of cognitive styles in social perception of the specified and impersonal Other^*

Milena V. Baleva
Ph.D. in Psychology, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: milenabaleva@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-3635

The paper studies the contributions of cognitive styles to the process of stereotyping and perceptual bias (ingroup favoritism). It was suggested that the role of cognitive styles weakens in conditions of the object’s perceptual clarity and amplifies in conditions of his/her perceptual nebulosity. In the experiment, the level of perceptual clarity appeared as an independent variable and was set using different stimulus objects. Low perceptual clarity was presented by a description of fictional groups of people sensitive to low or high frequency sounds. Medium perceptual clarity was characterized by a description of recognizable (typical) groups of people who preferred «low-status» or «high-status» things. The level of high clarity was set by visual presentation of a specific person allegedly being a representative of the group sensitive to low or high frequency sounds. At the level of low and medium perceptual clarity, the Other was not presented visually. The study involved 305 students aged 17 to 22 (M = 19,21, SD = 0,97), 71 male and 234 female. It was found that cognitive styles were the most reliable predictors for stereotyping of the Other when his/her image was as depersonalized as possible, i.e. devoid of typological and visual certainty. The highest values of stereotyping were observed upon pronounced rigidity, field-dependence, impulsivity and cognitive simplicity. When a specified, visually defined Other was perceived, cognitive styles did not affect the stereotyping. Perceptual bias (ingroup favoritism) did not change under the influence of cognitive styles, regardless of the perceptual clarity level.

Keywords: social perception, stereotyping, perceptual bias, ingroup favoritism, cognitive styles, perceptual clarity level.

References

Baleva, M.V. (2017). Kognitivno-stilevye i kontekstnye faktory ingruppovoy predvzyatosti i autgruppovoy stereotipizatsii pri vospriyatii iskusstvennykh sotsial’nykh grupp [Cognitive styles and contextual variables as the factors of ingroup bias and outgroup stereotyping in the perception of artificial social groups]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obschestvo [Social Psychology and Society]. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080205

Baleva, M.V., Gasimova, V.A. and Kovaleva, G.V. (2018). Kognitivnye mekhanizmy stereotipizatsii Drugogo [Cognitive mechanisms of stereotyping the Other]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205959218030054

Baleva, M.V. and Kovaleva, G.V. (2019). Sub’ektnyy i ob’ektnyy fokus sravneniya «Ya – Drugoy» v protsesse sotsial’noy pertseptsii [Self–Other comparative focus in social perception]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology]. Iss. 3, pp. 331–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-3-331-344

Bleda, P.R. (1974). Toward a clarification of the role of cognitive and affective processes in the similarity-attraction relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 368‒373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036003

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 752–766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5

DeWall, C., Maner, J. and Rouby, D. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 729‒741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014634

Duncan, B.L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 590‒598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.590

Eiser, J.R., Pahl, S. and Prins, Y.R.A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism and the direction of Self–Other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 37, pp. 77–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1438

Hamilton, D.L. and Gifford, R.K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 392–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(76)80006-6

Kahneman, D. (2018). Dumay medlenno… reshay bystro [Thinking, fast and slow]. Moscow: AST Publ., 653 p.

Kh’ell, L. and Zigler, D. (1997) Teorii lichnosti: Osnovnye polozheniya, issledovaniya i primenenie [Personality theories. Basic assumptions, research, and applications]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 608 p.

Kholodnaya, M.A. (2004). Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual’nogo uma [Cognitive styles. About the nature of the individual mind]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 384 p.

Kolga, V.A. (1976). Differentsial’no-psikhologicheskoe issledovanie kognitivnogo stilya i obuchaemosti: dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Differential-psychological study of cognitive style and learning: dissertation]. Leningrad, 164 p.

Lambert, A.J. and Wyer, R.S. (1990). Stereotypes and social judgment: The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 676‒691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.676

Lord, C.G. (1980). Schemas and images as memory aids: Two modes of processing social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 257‒269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.257

Machunsky, M. and Meiser, T. (2014). Cognitive components of ingroup projection: Prototype projection contributes to biased prototypicality judgments in group perception. Social Psychology. Vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. 15–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000156

McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. Vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 375–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375

Pahl, S. and Eiser, J.R. (2005). Valence, comparison focus and self-positivity biases: Does it matter whether people judge positive or negative traits? Experimental Psychology. Vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 303–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.303

Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, ed. by L. Berkowitz. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, vol. 19. pp. 123–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

Posten, A.C. and Mussweiler, T. (2013). When distrust frees your mind: The stereotype-reducing effects of distrust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 567‒584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033170

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in experimental social psychology, ed. by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, vol. 10, pp. 173–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3

Simon, B., Hastedt, C. and Aufderheide, B. (1997). When self-categorization makes sense: The role of meaningful social categorization in minority and majority members’ self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 310‒320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.310

Strack, F. and Deutsch, R. (2015). The duality of everyday life: Dual-process and dual-system models in social psychology. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 1: Attitudes and Social Cognition, ed. by M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, E. Borgida, J.A. Bargh. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Publ., pp. 891‒927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14341-028

Topolinski, S. and Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 39–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014678

Received 17.11.2019

For citation:

Baleva M.V. [The role of cognitive styles in social perception of the specified and impersonal Other]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 1, pp. 106–117 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-106-117

 

* The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research as part of the research project No 18-013-00329.