DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-38-50

Biographical studies in the history of psychology

Natalia A. Loginova
Doctor of Psychology, Professor,
Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology
and Differential PsychologySaint Petersburg State University,
7–9, Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russia;
e-mail: n.loginova@spbu.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-3497
ResearcherID: A-6824-2014

It is not often that professional historians of psychology study biographies as they prefer to limit themselves to an introductory biographical sketch and focus more on the analysis of scientific works, dominant theories, and methodologies of a particular historical period. The history of ideas seems to be more important than the history of man of science. However, it is wrong to completely disregard the personality of the person engaged in the process of scientific cognition. The destiny of ideas, their development and implementation in public consciousness and practice depend on a person. In the humanities, the human dimension of scientific knowledge is particularly pronounced. Here, scientific theories, specific studies are so personal that they bring science closer to art. Biographical studies of the life and work, talent and character of a scientist have their rightful place in the science of science, as well as in the historico-psychological science. These studies tend to become psychobiographical, they deal with the psychology of the subject of scientific cognition. The subject of the study is the creative individuality and life path of the leader of the St. Petersburg school of thought in the Soviet period, B.G. Ananiev. His work depended on specific socio-historical situations, the demands of society and the state, but was still performed in spite of historical obstacles. The life and scientific activity of the scientist were intrinsically motivated. The biography showed the importance of the scientist’s age as a factor of creativity and social, civic behavior. From this point of view, one can see such personality traits as the energy of a start in youth, enthusiasm and a change in attitude to life time due to age and individual characteristics. At the last phase of his life, despite physical ailments, B.G. Ananiev intensified his work trying to achieve his cherished goals in scientific knowledge. To a large extent, he succeeded. Over time, his contribution to psychology becomes more and more obvious. The prospects of the scientist’s ideas and research are confirmed in the 21st century.

Keywords: B.G. Ananiev, three dimensions of scientific development, psychobiography of a scientist, biographical psychology, features of psychobiographical research.

References

Abul’khanova-Slavskaya, K.A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 299 p. 

Abul’khanova-Slavskaya, K.A. and Brushlinskiy, A.V. (1989). Filosofsko-psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya S.L. Rubinshteyna[Philosophical and psychological concept of S.L. Rubinstein]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 248 p.

Anan’ev, B.G. (1931). [On some issues of the Marxist-Leninist reconstruction of Soviet psychology]. Psikhologiya [Psychology]. Vol. 4, iss. 3–4, pp. 325–344.

Anan’ev, B.G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Man as an object of cognition]. Leningrad: LSU Publ., 339 p.

Anan’ev, B.G. (1977). O problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya [About the problems of modern human knowledge]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 380 p.

Ananiev, B.G., Barsegov, A. (1926). Sovremennaya Armeniya [Modern Armenia]. Vladikavkaz: Vladikavkaz Armenian student community Publ., 92 p.

Bekhterev, V.M. (1928). Avtobiografiya [Autobiography]. Moscow: «Ogonek» Library Publ., 51 p. 

Elms, A.C. (1994). Uncovering lives. The uneasy alliance of biography and psychology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 328 p.

Golovakha, E.I. and Kronik, A.A. (1984). Psykhologicheskoe vremya lichnosti [Psychological time of personality]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka Publ., 209 p.

Kol’tsova, V.A. (2008). Istoriya psikhologii: Problemy metodologii [History of psychology: Problems of methodology]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 511 p.

Kol’tsova, V.A. and Kholondovich, E.N. (2013). Voploschenie dukhovnosty v lichnosti i tvorchestve F.M. Dostoevskogo [The incarnation of spirituality in the personality and creativity of F.M. Dostoevsky]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 304 p.

Korzhova, E.Yu. (2015). Vvedenie v psykhologiyu zhiznennykh situatsiy [Introduction to the psychology of life situations]. St. Petersburg: Society for the Memory of Abbess Taisiya Publ., 203 p.

Leont’ev, A.A., Leont’ev, D.A. and Sokolova, E.E. (2005). Aleksey Nikolaevich Leont’ev. Deyatelnost’, soznanie, lichnost’[Aleksey Nikolaevich Leontev. Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 431 p.

Loginova, N.A. (2001). Psikhobiograficheskiy metod izucheniya i korrektsii lichnosti [Psychobiographical method of research and correction of personality]. Almaty: KazNU Publ., 172 p.

Loginova, N.A. (2006). Boris Gerasimovich Anan’ev: Biografiya. Vospominaniya. Materialy [Boris Gerasimovich Ananyev: Biography. Memories. Materials]. St. Petersburg: SPbU Publ., 376 p.

Loginova, N.A. (2017). [Formation of the conceptual system of biographical psychology]. Integrativnyy podkhod k psikhologii cheloveka i sotsial’nomu vzaimodeystviyu lyudey: vektory razvitiya sovremennoy psikhologicheskoy nauki: v 2 ch. [Integrative approach to human psychology and social interaction of people: Vectors of development of modern science of psychological science: in 2 parts]. St. Petersburg: RGPU, pt. 1, pp. 169–176. 

Loginova, N.A. (2019). International relations of Leningrad psychologists after the Second World War. 38th Annual Conference of the European Society for the History of the Human Sciences: Book of Abstracts. Budapest: Central European University Publ., pp. 183–185.

Luria, A.R. (1982). Etapy proydennogo puti. Nauchnaya avtobiografiya [Stages of the completed path. Scientific autobiography]. Moscow: Moscow University Publ., 182 p.

Maslov, K.S. (2014). V svete nezrimogo: zhizn i sud’ba A.A. Krogiusa [In the light of the invisible: the life and fate of A.A. Krogius]. Tallinn: Tallinn University Publ., 560 p.

McAdams, D.P. (2008). [Psychology of life stories]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and History of Psychology]. Vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 135–166.

Myasishchev, V.N. (1953). Vydayuschiysya Russkiy uchenyy V.M. Bekhterev [Outstanding Russian scientist V.M. Bekhterev]. Moscow: Znaniye, 32 p.

Myasishchev, V.N. (1956). V.M. Bekhterev — zamechatel’nyy uchenyy, vrach, pedagog, obschestvennyy deyatel’ [V.M. Bekhterev is a remarkable scientist, doctor, teacher, public figure]. Kirov, 40 p.

Nicholson, I.A.M. (2003). Inventing personality. Gordon Allport and the science of Selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Publ., 301 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10514-000

Obozov, N.N. (2001). Psikhologiya Cheloveka. Ot tela k Dushe [Human’s psychology. From body to Soul]. St. Petersburg: Oblik Publ., 408 p.

Platonov, K.K. (2005). Moi lichnye vstrechi na velikoy doroge zhizni (Vospominaniya starogo psikhologa) [My personal meetings on the great road of life (Memoirs of an old psychologist)]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 310 p.

Runyan, W.K. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography. Exploration in theory and method. New York: Oxford University Press, 304 p.

Slavskaya, A.N. (2015). Osnovy psikhologii S.L. Rubinshteyna: filosofskoe osnovanie razvitiya [S.L. Rubinstein’s fundamentals of psychology: philosophical basis of development]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 344 p.

Stepanova, E.I. (2003). Stanovlenie psikhologicheskoy shkoly B.G. Anan’eva: Pamyatnye daty i sobytiya [The formation of the psychological school of B.G. Ananiev: Memorable dates and events]. St. Petersburg: Symposium Publ., 215 p.

Vygodskaya, G.L. and Lifanova, T.M. (1996). Lev Semenovich Vygotskiy. Zhizn’. Deyatelnost’. Shtrikhi k Portretu [Lev Semenovich Vygotsky. Life. Work. Brush strokes of the portrait]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 424 p.

Yaroshevskiy, M.G. (1973). [Three-spectrum science and problems of the scientific school]. Yaroshevskiy M.G. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy nauki [Yaroshevskiy M.G. Socio-psychological problems of science]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 174–184.

Received: 01.02.2022. Accepted: 15.02.2022

 

For citation:

Loginova N.A. [Biographical studies in the history of psychology]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2022, issue 1, pp. 38–50 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-38-50