ВЕСТНИК ПЕРМСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

Russian version of the article

DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-24-31

MODERN MATERIALISTIC ONTOLOGY OF REFLECTION

Shatova Natalia Dmitriyevna
Ph.D. in Pedagogical Sciences, Docent,
the Researcher Associate of Department
of the Organization and Planning of Research Work

Omsk State Pedagogical University,
14, Tukhachevsky emb., Omsk, 644099, Russia;
e-mail: shatova.nat@yandex.ru

Philosophers, psychologists, and teachers speak and write about a reflection very much. But all this generally occurs on an idealistic platform since still the problem of materialistic ontology of a reflection has not even been rised. And this is with the fact that in domestic philosophy and psychology the materialistic understanding of thinking is quite deeply developed. Having taken materialistic interpretation of mentality and thinking as a basis, being guided by data of neurophysiology, the author offers modern materialistic ontology of a reflection. The reflexive requirement which is subjectively felt as desire to realize own cogitative activity acts as a source of a reflection. This requirement is expressed by violation of dynamic balance of an organism and emergence of the increased excitement in neural systems of a brain. Elimination of the arisen excitement is reached by means of instant cross-correlation as a result of which new stable functional relation which undergoes some kind of testing by means of dvukhtablovy «mechanism» of thinking is formed: through the first and second board the thinking «is cleared» of subjectivity and psychologism of empirio-sensualistic knowledge and of possible antinomy of rationalistic gnoseology. As a result new stable functional relation is perceived by the subject as understanding of own thought process, i.e. a reflection.

Key words: reflection; ontology; materialism; thinking.

References

  1. Bekhtereva N.P. Zdorovyj i bolnoj mozg cheloveka [Healthy and sore brain of the person]. Moscow, AST Publ.; Saint-Petersburg, Sova Publ., 2010, 399 p. (In Russian).
  2. Bacon F. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Oeuvre: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, Myslvol. 1, 572 p. (In Russian).
  3. Hegel G.V.F. [Spirit phenomenology]. Sochineniya [Oeuvre]. Moscow, Izd-vo socialno-ehkonomicheskoj literatury Publ., 1959, vol. 4, 488 p.(In Russian).
  4. Danilova N.N., Krylova A.L. Fiziologiya vysshej nervnoj deyatelnosti [Physiology of higher nervous activity]. Rostov-na-Donu, Feniks Publ., 2005, 478 p. (In Russian).
  5. Dubrovskij D.I. [Problem of mind and body: possibilities of the decision]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. 2002, no 10, pp. 92–107. (In Russian).
  6. Zhilin V.I. [Psychology of perception and epistemology]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika. [Tidings of the Saratov State University. New series. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogics.]. 2014, no 4, pp. 18–23. (In Russian).
  7. Ivanitskij A.M., Strelets V.B., Korsakov I.A. Informacionnye processy mozga i psihicheskaya deyatelnost[Information processes of a brain and mental activity]. Moscow, Nauka, 1984, 201 p. (In Russian).
  8. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [The critiqueMoscow, Ehksmo, 2011, 736 p.(In Russian).
  9. Kopnin P.V. Filosofskie idei V.I. Lenina i logika [Philosophical ideas of V.I. Lenin and logics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969, 482 p. (In Russian).
  10. Marx K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj ehkonomii. T. 1. Kn. I. Process proizvodstva kapitala [Criticism of political economy. Vol. 1. Book I. Process of production of the capital]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1988. 891 p.(In Russian).
  11. Nugaev R.M. [Copernican Revolution: Interteoretichesky context]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. 2012, no 3, pp. 110–120.(In Russian).
  12. Petrushevskij S.A. Dialektika reflektornyh processov [Dialectics of reflex processes]. Moscow, Moskow State University Publ., 1967, 400 p. (In Russian).
  13. Pribram K. Yazyki mozga: Ehksperimentalnye paradoksy i principy nejropsihologii [Brain languages: Experimental paradoxes and principles of a neuropsychology]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1975, 464 p. (In Russian).
  14. Simonov P.V. [Memory, emotions and dominant]. VII Gagrskie besedy: Nejrofiziologicheskie osnovy pamyati [VIIth Gagry talks: Neurophysiological bases of memory]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba, 1979, pp. 358–377.(In Russian).
  15. Sudakov K.V. [Subjective party of activity]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. 2008, no 3,
  16. Sudakov K.V. Funkcionalnye sistemy. [Functional systems]. Moscow, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences Publ., 2011, 320 p. (In Russian).
  17. Shatova N.D. [Materialistic ontology of thinking in the modern solution of a psychophysical problem]. Novoe slovo v nauke i praktike: gipotezy i aprobaciya rezultatov issledovanij: mezhdunarodnyj sbornik nauchnyh trudov [The new word in science and practice: hypotheses and approbation of results of researches: international collection of papers]. Novosibirsk, 2015,
  18. Yacenko A.I. Celepolaganie i ideally [Goal-setting and ideals]. Kiev, Naukova dumka Publ, 1977, 276 p.(In Russian).

The date of the manuscript receipt 18.01.2016

Please cite this article in English as:

Shatova N.D. Modern materialistic ontology of reflection // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2016. Iss. 2(26). P. 24–31. doi: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-2-24-31