ВЕСТНИК ПЕРМСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2017-2-141-151

BASIC IDEAS AND CONCEPTS OF FEMINIST
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY

Voronina Olga Alexandrovna
Doctor of Philosophy,
Leading Researcher (Professor) of the Department
of Philosophy of Culture

Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences,
12/1, Goncharnaya str. Moscow, 109240, Russia;
e-mail: olga-voronina777@yandex.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-1122-2886

Feminist epistemology focuses on the study of how the gender system affects the concept of knowledge, the knowing subject and practices of research. Feminist philosophers identify ways in which the dominant conceptions and practices of knowledge attribution, acquisition, and justification systematically disadvantage women and other subordinated groups. Feminist epistemology argues that dominant knowledge practices are based on denying women’s epistemic authority, on the denigration of «feminine» cognitive styles and ways of knowing; on the creation of social theories that ignore the experiences of women and their interests, or doing gender power relations invisible. Moreover, such practices frequently produce knowledge that is not good for people in a subordinate position or even reinforce gender and other social hierarchies. Feminist epistemology challenges the effectiveness of many a priori accepted theses of classical science, e.g. objectivity, needed for social and emotional detachment of the knowing subject from the object etc. The central thesis of feminist epistemology is that the subject of cognition is always situated in a specific socio-cultural and personal situation, which inevitably leads to the temporality of cognition. That is why feminist philosophers have focused on determining the role of social and political values in research; evaluating ideals of objectivity and rationality; the recognition of epistemic values, ways of knowing, referred to as symbolically feminine; the necessity of reforming structures of epistemic authority. The author analyzes how these ideas have been explicated in different schools of feminist epistemology — feminist position epistemology, empiricism, postmodern and decolonialist directions. The author believes that despite the debatable nature of problems and methods discussed in feminist epistemology, it is necessary to recognize the importance of its heuristic and social potential.

Keywords: feminism, epistemology, women’s experience, gender, power, postmodernism, decolonialism.

References

  1. Motroshilova N.V. «Sotsial’naya epistemologiya»: novye problemy, diskussii i dikhotomii. [Social Epistemology: New Problems, Discussions and Dichotomies]. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and Meanings]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 5−31. (In Russian).
  2. Sotsial’naya epistemologiya: idei, metody, programmy / pod red. I.T. Kasavina [Social Epistemology: Ideas, Methods, Programs. Ed. by I.T. Kasavin]. Moscow, Kanon Plus Publ., 2010, 712 p. (In Russian).
  3. DeBlasio A. Novye tendentsii v al’ternativnykh epistemologiyakh [New Trends in Alternative Epistemology]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology & Philosophy of Science]. 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 160−172. DOI: 10.5840/eps201023117. (In Russian).
  4. Potter E. Feminism and Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. New York, Routledge, Taylor & Fransis Group Publ., 2006, 206 p. (In English).
  5. Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge. Ed. by G. McCanney. New York, New York University Press, 1988, 200 p. (In English).
  6. Keller E.F. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1985, 193 p. (In English).
  7. Feminist Approaches to Science. Ed. by R. Bleier. New York, Pergamon Press, 1986, 212 p. (In English).
  8. Feminizm: perspektivy sotsial’nogo znaniya / pod red. O.A. Voroninoy [Feminism: Perspectives of Social Knowledge. Ed. by O.A. Voronina]. Moscow, IF RAS-INION RAS Publ., 1992, 242 p.(In Russian).
  9. Haslanger S. Ontology and Social Construction. Philosophical Topics. 1995, vol. 23, pp. 95–125. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics19952324. (In English).
  10. Haraway D. Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, Routledge Publ., 1991, pp. 183−203.(In English).
  11. Bordo S. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany, State University of New York Press, 1987, 160 p. (In English).
  12. Voronina O.A. Oppozitsiya materii i dukha: gendernyy aspekt [Spirit and Matter Opposition: Gender Aspect]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. 2007, no. 2, pp. 56−66. (In Russian).
  13. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Reidel Publ., 1983, 332 p. (In English).
  14. Harding S. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: «What is “Strong Objectivity?”». Feminist Epistemologies. Ed. by L. Alcoff, E. Potter. New York, Routledge Publ., 1993, pp. 49–82. (In English).
  15. Longino H. Science, Power, Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophy of Science. Feminist Epistemologies. E (In English).
  16. Leshkevich T.G. Filosofiya nauki: traditsii i novatsii. V chem spetsifika epistemologii, gnoseologii, metodologii i filosofii nauki? Epistemologiya kak «departament mysli»[Philosophy of Science: Traditions and Innovations. What is the Specificity of Epistemology, Gnosis, Methodology and Philosophy of Science? Epistemology as a «Department of Thought»]. «Bouquiniste’s bookshelf» Library. Available at: http://society.polbu.ru/leshkevich_sciencephilo/ch02_i.html (accessed:
  17. Anderson E. Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce. Hypatia, 2004, Vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x. (In English).
  18. Belenky M.F., Clinchy B.M., Goldberger N.R., Tarulet J.M. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York, Basic Books Inc. Publ., 1986, 256 p. (In English).
  19. Pechenkin A.A. Ot Kuayna k feministskomu empirizmu: krizis epistemologii v sovremennoy filosofii nauki [From Quine to Feminist Empiricism: the Crisis of Epistemology in the Modern Philosophy of Science]. Filosofskie iskaniya: Moskovsko-Peterburgskiy sbornik [Philosophical Searches: Moscow-Petersburg Collection]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2011, vol. 2, pp. 193–214.(In Russian).
  20. Rose H. Hand, Brain and Heart: a Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1983, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 73–90. DOI: 10.1086/494025. (In English).
  21. Hartsock N.C.M. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and other Essays. New York, Westview Press, 1998, 272 p. (In English).
  22. Flax J. Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by S. Harding, M. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Reidel Publ., 1983, vol. 161, pp. 245–281.DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48017-4_14. (In English).
  23. Smith D. The Conceptual Practice of Power: a Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston, North Eastern University Press, 1990, 235 p. (In English).
  24. Lugones M., Spelman E. Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for «The Woman’s Voice». Women’s Studies International Forum. 1983, vol. 6, iss. 6, pp. 573–581. DOI: (In English).
  25. Klinger C. Pozitsii i problemy teorii poznaniya [Positions and Problems of Theory of Cognition]. Pol, gender, kultura / pod red. E. Shore, K. Khayder [Sex, Gender, Culture. Ed. by E. Cheaure, C. Heyder]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2000, iss. 2, pp. 118−127. (In Russian).
  26. Harding S. The Instability of the Analytical Categories of Feminist Theory. Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Ed. by S. Harding, J. O’Barr. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1987, pp. 283–302.(In English).
  27. Braidotti R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. New York, Routledge Publ., 1991, 336 p. (In English).
  28. Feminism/Postmodernism. Ed. by L. Nicholson. New York, Routledge Publ., 1990, 360 p. (In English).
  29. Hekman S. Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited. Signs. 1997, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 341–365. DOI: 10.1086/495159. (In English).
  30. Fraser N. False Antitheses. Feminist Contentions. Ed. by S. Benhabib, J. Butler, C. Drucilla, N. Fraser. New York, Routledge Publ., 1995,(In English).
  31. Tlostanova M.V. Dekolonialnye gendernye epistemologii [De-Colonial Gender Epistemologies]. Moscow, Maska Publ., 2009, 386 p. (In Russian).
  32. Lugones M. Heterosexualism and the Colonial-Modern Gender System. Hypatia. 2007, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 186−209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x. (In English).
  33. Mohanty Ch.T. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Theory: A Reader. Ed. by W. Kolmar, F. Bartkowski. Mountain View, Mayfield Publ., 2000, pp. 344–351. (In English).
  34. Namaste V. Undoing Theory: The «Transgender Question» and the Epistemic Violence of Anglo-American Feminist Theory. Hypatia. 2009, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 11–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01043.x. (In English).
  35. Narayan U. Dislocating Cultures. Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism. New York, Routledge Publ., 2007, 240 p. (In English).

The date of the manuscript receipt 02.03.2017

Please cite this article in English as:

Voronina O.A. Basic ideas and concepts of feminist social epistemology // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2017. Iss. 2. P.141–151. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2017-2-141-151

Категория: Philosophy. Просмотров: 8117