DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2017-2-240-249

FIXATION TIME AVERAGE IN CAUCASIANS’ PERCEPTION
OF CAUCASIAN and MONGOLOID FACES^*

Khrisanfova Ludmila Arkad’evna
Ph.D. in Psychology, Docent, Associate Professor
of the Department of General and Social Psychology

Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod,
23, Gagarin av., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia;
e-mail: l.hri@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0001-6697-7939

The article presents results of a comparative study on the characteristics of eye movement of Caucasian subjects as a response to looking at photos of Caucasian and Mongoloid faces. The subjects were expected to assess a number of psychological qualities of people in the photos — their activity, tenseness and attractiveness. A set of photos of real people aged 20–30 with Caucasian and Mongoloid faces was used as stimuli. The subjects were 23 Caucasians aged 18–22. The study objectives were to confirm the hypothesis about some common, «universal» patterns of looking at a human face irrespective of its owner’s race, to identify the characteristics of a human face perception depending on the particular race, as well as to identify a particular strategy of looking at a human face in the course of dealing with various assigned tasks.

Our findings show that 1) when dealing with Mongoloid faces, an extended pattern of a human face examination is more common: the face as a whole – the right eye – the left eye – the nose – the lips; 2) for Caucasian subjects, the Fixation Time Average (ms) is longer for the left eye when they look at Caucasian faces, while it is not so when the subjects examine Mongoloid faces; 3) when the subjects are assessing the activity of an individual in the photo, the Fixation Time Average is longer for the Mongoloid faces’ right eye zone, while for Caucasian faces the focus is still on the left eye zone; 4) when the subjects are assessing tenseness of individuals in the photos, the Fixation Time Average is the longest for the left eye and nose zones, both for Caucasian faces (with significant values), and Mongoloid faces (as a trend); 5) when the subjects are assessing attractiveness, the fixation zones are the same as those for assessing tenseness (the left eye and nose zones) for Caucasian faces, while for Mongoloid faces the face as a whole is examined longer (i.e., other face zones — eyebrows, forehead, cheeks etc.). The results are valuable for research into perception of an individual’s personal characteristics and qualities while examining their face, as well as perception of human faces of different races.

Keywords: perception of a face, face zones, Caucasian race, Mongoloid race, eye tracking, eye movements, activity, tenseness, attractiveness.

References

1. Belopolskiy V.I. Funktsional’naya struktura i dinamika vzora cheloveka: avtoref. dis. … d-ra psikhol. nauk [Functional Structure and Dynamics of the Human Eye. Abstract of Dr. psychol. sci. dis.]. Moscow, 2008, 51 p. (In Russian).
2. Barabanschikov V.A., Zhegallo A.V. Registratsiya i analiz napravlennosti vzora cheloveka. [Registration and Orientation Analysis of the Human Eye]. Moscow, IP RAS Publ., 2013. 316
3. Yarbus A.L. Rol’ dvizheniy glaz v protsesse zreniya [The Role of Eye Movements in the Vision Process]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965, 166 p. (In Russian).
4. Khrisanfova L.A., Barabanschikov V.A., Zhegallo A.V. Otsenka vzroslymi individualno-psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik rebenka po ego fotografii [Individual Psychological Characteristics of Children Evaluated from Photographs of Their Faces by Adult Observers]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2016, Vol. 9, no. 2. pp. 38–52. DOI:10.17759/exppsy.2016090204. (In Russian).
5. Khrisanfova L.A. Issledovanie vzaimosvyazi litsevoy simmetrii–asimmetrii s nekotorymi psikhologicheskimi i psikhofiziologicheskimi osobennostyami cheloveka [Research Into Interrelation Between Facial Symmetry/Asymmetry and Some Psychic and Psychophysiological Characteristics of a Person]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Psikhologiya [Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod]. 2009, no. 4, pp. 304–311. (In Russian).
6. Mekhanik N.S. Osnovy plasticheskoy anatomii [Basics of Plastic Anatomy]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1958, 432 p. (In Russian).
   1. Artemtseva N.G. Vospriyatie psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik cheloveka po «razdelennomu litsu»: avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. [Perception of Psychological Characteristics of a Person by a «Divided Face». Abstract of Cand. psychol. sci. dis.]. Moscow, 2003, 19 p. (In Russian).
   2. Lupenko E.A. Vliyanie prostranstvennoy asimmetrii litsa na vospriyatie lichnosti cheloveka po portretnomu izobrazheniyu [Influence of the Spatial Asymmetry of the Face on the Perception of a Person’s Identity from Portraits]. Litso cheloveka v prostranstve obscheniya / otv. red. K.I. Ananeva, V.A. Barabanschikov, A.A. Demidov [A Human Face in the Space of Communication. Ed. by K.I. Ananeva, V.A. Barabanschikov, A.A. Demidov]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2016, pp. 283–305. (In Russian).

The date of the manuscript receipt 17.02.2017

Please cite this article in English as:

Khrisanfova L.A. Fixation time average in Caucasians’ perception of Caucasian and Mongoloid faces // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2017. Iss.2. P.240–249. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2017-2-240-249

---