DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-158-168

Power and punishment in M. Foucault’s genealogical project

Ivan V. Ryazanov
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent, Associate Professor
of the Department of History and Philosophy

Perm State Agrarian and Technological University
named after D.N. Pryanishnikova,
23, Petropavlovskaya str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: iwan.riazanow@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4676-2452

The article proposes analytical reconstruction of the French philosopher and historian M. Foucault’s interpretation strategy related to the genealogical project The History of Punishment. The object of cognition marginalization is content moment of this reconstruction, as contributing to both the transformation of the research subject field and the genealogical identification of the object. There are defined the rules of reconstruction, contributing to the diffusion of the methodological approach to power in the genealogy of M. Foucault. The article substantiates the position that the use of some individual rules of reconstruction cannot lead to methodological unity in the genealogical project due to the marginal-positive identification of the object and the structure of The History of Punishment. Comparison of J. Deleuze’s functional analysis and M. Foucault’s genealogical approach to the problem of power points to the diffusion of the method, which is unable to localize its object in the social space. In many ways, this will be facilitated by the use of the visual model as an epistemological one, which is traditional for Foucault’s research. All the dynamic and structural characteristics that are used in Foucault’s genealogy to analyze the concept of Microphysics of power will be reduced to marginal anthropology. In the genealogical period of the French thinker’s work, marginal anthropology is regarded as a way of constructing genealogical reality. Genealogical description as a method of a marginal object description is viewed as a consequence of methodological diffusion. The phenomenon of disciplinary power is considered as a marginal construction, deriving the concept of normal-abnormal from the totality of disciplinary practices, structuring the European society. M. Foucault’s focus on marginal anthropology will serves as a basis for the transition to The History of Sexuality project.

Keywords: anthropology, archaeology, madness, power, genealogy, hermeneutics, discourse, disciplinary power, marginal, microphysics of power, punishment, sexuality.

References

Arac, J. (1988). After Foucault. Humanistic knowledge.Postmodern challenges. New York, 208 p.

Corben, A., Hermann, R.A., Hall, K., Hant, L. and Martin-Fougier, A. (2018). Istoriya chastnoy zhizni [The history of private life]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 672 p.

Deleuze, G. (1998). Fuko [Foucault].Moscow: Humanitarian Literature Publ., 172 p.

Dyakov, A.V. (2014). Posleslovie perevodchika [The epilogue of the translator]. Fuko M. Muzhestvo istiny. Upravlenie soboy i drugimi II. Kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1983/1984 uchebnom godu [Foucault M. Courage of truth. Managing yourself and others II. Course of lectures delivered at the Collège de France in 1983/1984 academic year]. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 347–348.

Foucault, M. (1999). Eto ne trubka: navyazchivost’ vzglyada Fuko i zhivopis’ [This is not a pipe. Obsession of view: M. Foucault and painting] Saint-Petersburg: Khudozhestvenny zhurnal Publ., 150 p.

Foucault, M. (2004). Nenormal’nye: kurs lektsiy, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1974/1975 yuchebnom godu [Abnormal: lectures delivered at the Collège de France 1974/1975 academic year]. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 432 p.

Ilyin, I.P. (1998). Postmodernizm ot istokov do kontsa stoletiya: evolutsiya nauchnogo mifa [Postmodernism from its origins to the end of the century: the evolution of the scientific myth]. Moscow: Intrada Publ., 255 p.

Kil’dushev, O.V. (2014). Mishel’ Fuko kak issledovatel’ «politseyskogo gosudarstva»: programma, evristicheskie problemy, perspektivy izucheniya [Michel Foucault as a researcher of «police state»: program, heuristic problems, prospects of study]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. No. 13(3), pp. 9–32.

Lizina, N.B. (2011). Praktika vlasti kak upravlencheskie otnosheniya v rabotakh M. Fuko [Power practice as managerial relations in the works of M. Foucault]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Izvestiya of Altai State University]. No. 2(2), pp. 206–209.

Nizovtsev, D.V. (2015). Problema Vlasti v rabotakh M. Fuko [The problem of Power in the works of M. Foucault]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki [Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences]. No. 4, pp. 49–57.

Novikov, O.V. (2009). Modeli Vlasti i Znaniya v teorii M. Fuko [Model of Power and Knowledge in the theory of M. Foucault]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya Kulturologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. Muzeologiya [RGGU Bulletin. Series: Culturology. Art history. Museology]. No. 15, pp. 52–60.

Rusakov, S.S. (2016). Trekhurovnevaya kontseptsiya politicheskoy vlasti M. Fuko [Three-Level conception of political power of M. Foucault]. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences]. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 114–124.

Vizgin, V.P. (2004). Genealogicheskiy proekt Mishelya Fuko: ontologicheskie osnovaniya [Of the Genealogical project of Michel Foucault: ontological foundations]. Mishel’ Fuko i Rossiya [Michel Foucault and Russia]. Saint-Petersburg: European University at St. Petersburg, Letniy sad Publ., pp. 96–110.

Zekrist, R.H. (2012). Kontseptsiya vlasti M. Fuko [The Concept of power of Michel Foucault]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obschestvennye nauki [Izvestiya Ural Federal University Journal. Series 3. Social and Political Sciences]. No. 2(103), pp. 40–46.

Received 28.01.2019

For citation:

Ryazanov I.V. Power and punishment in M. Foucault’s genealogical project // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2019. Iss. 2. P. 158–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-158-168