DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-284-393
On the attitude to conducting theological examination
Pavel F. Sirotkin
Ph.D. in Sociology, Associate Professor
of the Department of Sociology
Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: spf@list.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-7679
The development of modern religious practices, growing diversity of these practices, and also some liberalization of legislation on the registration of religious organizations will serve as a trigger for the transition of religious groups that previously operated informally to the public sphere. All these factors open the door for many of these groups to obtain religious organization formal status. On the other hand, the emergence of eclectic teachings, which often include elements of scientific, commercial, environmental, and other concepts, also provides the basis for conducting theological analysis. These social processes allow us to forecast the further steady increase in the number of appeals of the state bodies to expert councils to determine the religious component in the activities of a particular social group. In the last few years, there were banned the religious organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses, some neo-pagan and Islam-oriented organizations, some pseudo-scientific cults, including Revelation of the New Century. These bans, as well as the decisions concerning judicial examination of some religious literature content (Bhagavad Gita and E. Kuliev’s translations of the Quran), indicate high demand for theological examination at present. However, the ambiguity of the society’s perception of some court decisions made based on theological examination and periodically criticized in the media quality of training for specialists involved in the process of theological examination make an additional analysis of regarding functioning of this institution, as well as decisions made following the results of theological examination, ever more urgent.
Keywords: religious practices, theological examination, expert council, religious organization.
References
Ekspertnoe zaklyuchenie Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Upravlenii Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Permskomu krayu ot 25 yanvaria 2017 g. [Expert opinion of the Expert Council for the State Religious Expertise at the Office of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation in the Perm territory from January 25, 2017]. Available at: https://to59.minjust.ru/ru/ekspertnyy-sovet-po-provedeniyu-gosudarstvennoy-religiovedcheskoy-ekspertizy-5 (accessed: 22.03.2019).
Ekspertnoe zaklyuchenie Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Upravlenii Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Permskomu krayu ot 01 marta 2018 g. № 1 [Expert opinion of the Expert Council for the State Religious Expertise at the Office of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation in the Perm territory from March 1, 2018, no. 1]. Available at: https://to59.minjust.ru/ru/ekspertnyy-sovet-po-provedeniyu-gosudarstvennoy-religiovedcheskoy-ekspertizy-5 (accessed 22.03.2019).
Ekspertnoe zaklyuchenie Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Upravlenii Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Permskomu krayu ot 6 noyabrya 2018 g. № 3 [Expert opinion of the Expert Council for the State Religious Expertise at the Office of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation in the Perm territory from November 6, 2018, no. 3]. Available at: https://to59.minjust.ru/ru/ekspertnyy-sovet-po-provedeniyu-gosudarstvennoy-religiovedcheskoy-ekspertizy-5 (accessed 22.03.2019).
Ekspertnoe zaklyuchenie Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Upravlenii Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Respublike Adygeya [Expert opinion of the Expert Council for the State Religious Expertise at the Office of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for the Republic of Adygea]. Available at: http://docx.lib-i.ru/29raznoe/85524-1-ekspertnoe-zaklyuchenie-rezultatam-provedeniya-gosudarstvennoy-religiovedcheskoy-ekspertizi-otno.php (accessed 22.03.2019).
Ekspertnoe zaklyuchenie Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Upravlenii Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii po Respublike Altay [Expert opinion of the Expert Council for the State Religious Expertise at the Office of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for the Altai Republic]. Available at: https://pandia.ru/text/78/057/33360.php (accessed 22.03.2019).
Ekspertnyy sovet po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Ministerstve yustitsii Rossiskoy Federatsii [Council for State Religious Expertise at the Ministry of Justice of Russian Federation]. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Экспертный_совет_по_проведению_государственной_религиоведческой_экспертизы_при_Министерстве_юстиции_Российской_Федерации (accessed 05.03.2019).
Elbakyan, Е.S. (2012). Nauchnost’ religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy: vozmozhnost’ i neobkhodimost’ [The scientific religious expertise: possibility and need]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Novye vyzovy svobode sovesti v sovremennoy Rossii» [Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference «New challenges to freedom of conscience in modern Russia»]. Moscow: Drevo zhizni Publ., pp. 139–150.
Elbakyan, Е.S. (2014). Ekstremizm li eto? [Is it extremism?]. Nauka o religii v XXI veke: traditsionnye metody i novye paradigm, pod red. M.M. Shakhnovich, T.V. Chumakovoy, Е.A. Teryukovoy [The science of religion in the 21st century: traditional methods and new paradigms, ed. by M.M. Shakhnovich, T.V. Chumakova, Е.A. Teryukova]. Saint-Petersburg: SPbSU Publ., Museum of the History of Religion Publ. 492 p.
Pismanik M.G. [Pismanik M.G.] Perm State Institute of Culture. Available at: http://psiac.ru/struct/sotr/277 (accessed 22.02. 2019).
Politova, S.I. (2014). Osnovy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy: kurs lektsiy [Fundamentals of religious expertise: lecture course]. Kazan: KFU Publ., 23 p.
Prikaz Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 fevralya 2009 g. № 53 «O gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertize» [Order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation of February 18, 2009, no. 53 «On State Religious Expertise»]. Available at: https://rg.ru/2009/03/13/religia-ekspertiza-dok.html (accessed: 22.03.2019).
Problema religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy v Rossii [The problem of religious expertise in Russia]. Federation of judicial experts, 2017, March 8. Available at: http://sud-expertiza.ru/problema-religiovedcheskoy-ekspertizy-v-rossii (accessed 22.03. 2019).
Sostav Ekspertnogo soveta po provedeniyu gosudarstvennoy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy pri Ministerstve yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii – 08.04.09 [The composition of the expert council for the state religious expertise at the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation – 08.04.09]. Center for Religious Studies in the name of the martyr Irenaeus of Lyons. Available at: http://iriney.ru/main/pravo/novosti-razdela-pravo/sostav-ekspertnogo-soveta-po-provedeniyu-gosudarstvennoj-religiovedcheskoj-ekspertizyi-pri-ministerstve-yusticzii-rossijskoj-federaczii.html (accessed 22.02 2019).
Zagrebina, I.V. (2013). Ot nevezhestva k mnimomu ekstremizmu: problemy religiovedcheskoy ekspertizy v Rossii [From ignorance to alleged extremism: the problems of religious expertise in Russia]. Gosudarstvo. religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide]. No. 2, pp. 159–176.
Zagrebina, I.V., Pchelincev, A.V. and Elbakyan, E.S. (2017). Religiovedcheskaya ekspertiza [Religious examination]. Moscow: Yurayt Publ., 449 p.
Received 01.05.2019
For citation:
Sirotkin P.F. On the attitude to conducting theological examination // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2019. Iss. 2. P. 284–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-284-393