ВЕСТНИК ПЕРМСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-14-28

Marx’s theoretical heritage and modernity. Part 2. Theory and practice of Marxism

Lyeva A. Musayelyan
Doctor of Philosophy, Docent,
Head of the Department of Philosophy

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: lmusaelyan@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-5871

The article is a continuation of previous one, published in the preceding issue of this journal. It shows that any philosophical theory and a concept of the social ideal developed on its basis are somehow conditioned by the problems of the existing social reality. According to political leaders, the various models of socialism that existed in the last century represented the practical implementation of Marx’s teachings. Certainly, the Soviet Union appeared as a result of revolutionary activities of Lenin and his associates, who were devoted supporters of Marxism. Why did the socialist project fail in Russia? The article analyzes the problem of correlation between the social ideal developed by the founders of Marxism and the social reality that arose as a result of its implementation. The difference between utopia and a scientifically based social ideal is revealed, the difficulties of implementing any social ideal (theory) are considered. Socialism built in the Soviet Union causes many questions concerning the nature of this society; however, in the process of its construction Lenin and his associates relied on the ideas of the founders of Marxism. The paper studies the reasons for the differences between real socialism and Marx’s social ideal and identifies the factors that contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union. According to the author’s position, among those factors, of great importance was the superficial understanding of both the dialectics of interformational transition and criteria for distinguishing various types of society.

Keywords: theory and practice, social ideal, utopia, real socialism, «crude communism», «fundamental task of Soviet power», Soviet Union, formation, «mystery of history».

References

Abalkin, L.I. (ed.) (2007). Ekonomicheskaya istoriya SSSR [Economic history of the USSR]. Moscow: Il’fa-M Publ., 496 p.

Alferov, Zh. (2018). I vse-taki pochemu sotsializm? [And yet, why socialism?]. Rossiyskaya gazeta. No. 220, oct. 2. Available at: https://rg.ru/2018/10/02/chto-pisal-o-kapitalizme-albert-ejnshtejn.html (accessed 12.09.2019).

Bogdanov, A. (1990). Voprosy sotsializma [Socialism issues]. Bogdanov A. Voprosy sotsializma: Raboty raznykh let [Bogdanov A. Socialism: Works of different years]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., pp. 295–351.

Bostandzhyan, K.M. (1967). Dialektika stanovleniya kommunisticheskogo sposoba proizvodstva [Dialectics of the formation of the communist mode of production]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 301 p.

Bostandzhyan, K.M. (1986). Ekonomicheskiy i sotsial’nyy progress pri sotsializme [Economic and social progress under socialism]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 183 p.

Buzgalin, A.V. and Kolganov, A.I. (2007). Global’nyy kapital [Global capital]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 512 p.

Buzgalin, A.V. and Linke, P. (2013). SSSR. Nezavershennyy proekt [The USSR. Incomplete project]. Moscow: Lenand Publ., 528 p.

Engels, F. (1961). Anti-Dyuring [Anti-During]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 20. pp. 5–338.

Engels, F. (1962). Interv’yu F. Engel’sa korrespondentu frantsuzskoy gazety «Le Figaro» 11 maya 1893 goda [Le Figaro interviews Engels]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 22, pp. 559–564.

Engels, F. (1961). K zhilischnomu voprosu [The housing question]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 18, pp. 203–284.

Engels, F. (1965). Pis’mo J. Blokhu, 21–22 sent. 1880 g. [Letter to J. Bloch, September 21–22, 1880]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 37, pp. 393–397.

Fromm, E. (1991). Sotsializm [Socialism]. Kommunist [Communist]. No 11, pp. 27–38.

Furman, A.E. (1970). Istoricheskiy materializm: kurs lektsiy [Historical materialism: a course of lectures]. Moscow: MSU Publ., 371 p.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1974). Nauka logiki [Science of logic]. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk [Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, 452 p.

Kalashnikov, M.F. (2006). Sotsial’nyy ideal. Teoriya i sovremennost’. Opyt sotsial’no-filosofskogo analiza [The social ideal. Theory and modernity. The experience of socio-philosophical analysis.]. Perm: PSPU Publ., 279 p.

Krzhevov, V.S. (2018). Teoriya obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy i programma sotsialisticheskoy revolyutsii v Rossii [Theory of social formations and the socialist revolution program in Russia]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 12, pp. 47–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s004287440002583-6

Kumar, K. (1992). Marksizm i utopiya [Marxism and utopia]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and contemporary world]. No. 3, pp. 125–135. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/260/925/1219/12-Kumar.pdf (accessed 11.10.2018).

Lenin, V.I. (1967). Chto takoe druz’ya naroda i kak oni voyuyut protiv sotsial-demokratov [What the friends of the people are and how they fight the Social-Democrats]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 1. pp. 125–346.

Lenin, V.I. (1969). Krakh II Internatsionala [The collapse of the Second International]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 26, pp. 209–265.

Lenin, V.I. (1970). Velikiy pochin [The great initiative]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 39, pp. 1–29.

Lenin, V.I. (1974). Ocherednye zadachi sovetskoy vlasti [The immediate tasks of the Soviet government]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 36, pp. 165–208.

Marx, K. (1969). Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 gg. [Economic manuscripts 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 46, pt. 2, 626 p.

Marx, K. (1974). Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 42, pp. 41–174.

Marx, K. (1960). Kapital T. 1 [Capital. Vol. 1]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 23, 920 p.

Marx, K. (1957). Naemnyy trud i kapital [Wage labour and capital]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 6, pp. 428–459.

Marx, K. (1957). Vosemnadtsatoe bryumera Lui Bonaparta [The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 8, pp. 115–217.

Mitchell, T. (2014). Uglerodnaya demokratiya. Politicheskaya vlast’ v epokhu nefti [Carbon democracy. Political power in the oil age]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 408 p.

Musaelyan, L.A. (2016). Istoricheskiy protsess i globalizatsiya [Historical process and globalization]. Perm: PSU Publ., 128 p.

Oleynikov, Yu.V. (2018). Verifikatsiya revolyutsionnykh prozreniy Marksa [Verification of Karl Mark’s revolutionary insights]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 4, pp. 27–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-4-27-44

Oyzerman, T.I. (2002). Marksistskaya kontseptsiya sotsializma i real’nyy sotsializm [The marxist concept of socialism and real socialism]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 3, pp. 16–31.

Platonov, S. (1990). Posle kommunizma: kniga ne prednaznachennaya dlya pechati [After communism: a book not for print]. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 255 p.

Semenov, Yu.I. (1997). Vsemirnaya istoriya kak edinyy protsess razvitiya chelovechestva vo vremeni i prostranstve [World history as a single process of human development in time and space]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 1, pp. 156–217.

Semenov, Yu.I. (1998). Marksova teoriya obschestvenno-ekonomicheskikh formatsiy i sovremennost’ [Marx’s theory of socio-economic formations and modernity]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3, pp. 190–233.

Shainyan, K. (2015). Imperiya hlopka: maloizvestnaya krovavaya istoriya kapitalizma [The empire of cotton: a little-known bloody history of capitalism]. Republic. Jan. 16. Available at: https://republic.ru/posts/1533 (accessed 12.03.2015).

Shevchenko, V.N. (2016). Tsivilizatsionnyy podkhod pod ognem kritiki [Civilization approach under the fire of criticism]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 2, pp. 33–44.

Received 03.10.2019

For citation:

Musayelyan L.A. [Marx’s theoretical heritage and modernity. Part 2. Theory and practice of Marxism]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 1, pp. 14–28 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-1-14-28