DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-215-222
Cognitive base for the information interchange in the processes of cultural communication
Vladimir A. Sidorenko
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy,
Law, Social and Humanitarian Sciences
Saint Luka Lugansk State Medical University,
1 g, 50 Let Oborony Luganska bl., Lugansk, 91045, Ukraine;
e-mail: philosophy.lsmu@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-4228
Cognitive processes underlying the interchange of cultural information are twofold: on the one hand, the anthropospheric level of cultural knowledge organization allows the recipient to receive it in a processed and ready-to-use form. On the other hand, obtaining from the culture ready-made solutions to the problems faced leads to a decrease in the individual’s ability to produce his or her own creative ideas. The processes of cultural information processing are divided into assimilative (aimed at the inclusion of input into the recipient’s mental system) and accommodative (aimed at adapting his or her own worldview to information coming from outside) ones. The information received in the process of cultural communication is internalized by the recipient to the extent he or she is sensitive to it. In this case, sensitivity is understood as the ability to harmoniously embed the input data into the existing system of cognitive schemes. At the same time, the act of informational translation becomes a stimulus, while the internalization of data is a reaction to it. A fundamental principle of cultural information assimilation is cognitive economy — the desire to obtain the most effective solution to the problem with the minimum expenditure of mental resources. Often, the result is development of cognitive laziness, inability and unwillingness to use the resources freed up for creative work which could then be used by the person as a donor of cultural information. With the increase in the amount of assimilated information, the level of its recipient’s adaptability to the system of culture increases both in the local and global sense applicable to humanity as a whole as the largest of the cultural groups. At the same time, increasing the degree of cultural adaptation leads to a decrease in the person’s creative potential since creativity takes a person beyond the general group vector of cultural development.
Keywords: cultural space, globalization, translation of information, communication mechanisms, assimilation, accommodation, interiorization of information, principle of cognitive economy, creativity.
References
Bankovskaya, S.P. (ed.) (2002). Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya: Antologiya, per. s angl., fr., nem. [Theoretical sociology: Anthology, trans. from English, French, German, and Italian]. Moscow: Knizhnyy dom «Universitet» Publ., 424 p.
Cole, M. (1997). Kulturno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural psychology]. Moscow: Cogito-Centre Publ., 432 p.
Gazzaniga, M.S., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. and Baynes, K. (2010). The cognitive neuroscience of mind: a tribute to Michael S. Gazzaniga. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 256 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014014.001.0001
Goncharov, V.S. (2006). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe proektirovanie kognitivnogo razvitiya shkol’nikov: dis. … d-ra psikhol. nauk [Psychological and pedagogical projecting for cognitive development of schoolchildren: dissertation]. Kurgan, 407 p.
Guilford, J.P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: some suggested remedies. Psychological Review. No. 89, iss. 1, pр. 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.48
Haggbloom, S.J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J.E., Jones, V.K. et al. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology. Vol. 6, iss. 2, pр. 139–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139
Harlow, H.F. and Harlow, P. (1999). Human model: primate perspective. Great Falls, MT: Winston Publ., 366 р.
Hayes, J.R. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. Thinking and learning skills. Vol. 2: Research and open questions, ed. by S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, R. Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ., 640 p.
Huxley, A. (2004). Vechnaya filosofiya [The perennial philosophy]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 464 p.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 596 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lazarev, F.V., Syropyatov, O.G. and Yanovskiy, S.S. (2012). Psikhosomaticheskaya antropologiya: teoriya i praktika [Psychosomatic anthropology: theory and practice]. Simferopol: N. Oreanda Publ., 152 p.
Park, R. (1989). Assimilation. Introduction to the Science of Sociology, ed. by R. Park, E. Burgess. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 734–739.
Prokopchuk, Yu.A. (2010). Informatsionnaya struktura teorii estestvennoy predmetnoy oblasti [Informational structure of the natural subject theory]. Vestnik Khersonskogo natsional’nogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University]. No. 2(38), pp. 11–19.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ., 328 р.
Solso, R. (2006). Kognitivnaya psikhologiya [Cognitive psychology]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 589 p.
Yudina, T.N. (2007). Migratsiya: slovar’ osnovnykh terminov [Migration: the basic term dictionary]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 472 p.
Received 12.04.2020
For citation:
Sidorenko V.A. [Cognitive base for the information interchange in the processes of cultural communication]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 2, pp. 215–222 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-2-215-222