ВЕСТНИК ПЕРМСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-355-364

Hermotimus of Clazomenae as Anaxagoras’s predecessor

Oleg A. Matveychev
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Professor of the Department
of Mass Communications and Media Business

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation,
49, Leningradskiy av., Moscow, 125993, Russia;
e-mail: matveyol@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-2650

The article analyzes Aristotle’s testimony of a possible continuity between the teachings of Hermotimus of Clazomenae and his compatriot Anaxagoras. This testimony will remain the only one among the later ancient reports concerning Hermotimus, representing him more as a wizard and a seer than a philosopher. In this way, his image is presented until the 19th century; Hegel, Zeller, Windelband and others showed undisguised skepticism towards this figure. The state of affairs began to change at the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries, when the irrational aspects of ancient thought started to attract researchers. Rohde draws attention to the profound transformation of ideas about the soul in the 7th – 6th centuries BC, when the soul started to be perceived as existing separately from the body, as a special substance not reducible to the latter. E. Dodds discovers the origins of this new concept in the northern countries that opened up to the Greek world due to the colonization of the Black Sea coast and enriched the culture of Hellas with elements of «shamanism». The ability to experience the separation of soul and body was a hallmark of magicians and seers of a special kind that appeared in the 7th – 6th centuries BC — Abaris, Aristaes, Epimenides, and others. Rohde considers Hermotimus to be the most notable example of such a magician. It was from his personal experience that Hermotimus could draw a conclusion about the irreducibility of matter and spirit to each other, and, as a consequence, of the separateness of Mind as a universal principle. The distinction between spirit (soul) and matter (body) will become the fundamental principle of Greek philosophy; the concept of Mind (Nous) will serve as the foundation for the system of Anaxagoras, the first Athenian philosopher, from whom, in fact, the history of classical Greek philosophy begins.

Keywords: history of philosophy, Ancient Greece, Hermotimus of Clazomenae, Anaxagoras, Nous, problem of the spiritual and material, shamanism, E. Rohde, E. Dodds.

References

Aristotle (1976). Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Aristotel’. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t. [Aristotle. Collected works: in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 63–367.

Aristotle (1976). O dushe [On the soul]. Aristotel’. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 t. [Aristotle. Collected works: in 4 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 369–448.

Belyakov, A.V. and Matveychev, O.A. (2019). Giperboreya: priklyucheniya idei [Hyperborea: idea’s adventures]. Moscow: Knizhnyy Mir Publ., 416 p.

Belyakov, A.V. and Matveychev, O.A. (2014). Troyanskiy kon’ zapadnoy istorii [Trojan horse of western history]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 224 p.

Carus, F.A. (1809). Nachgelassene Werke. Bd. IV: Ideen zur Geschichte der Philosophie [Postponed works. Vol. 4: Ideas on the history of philosophy]. Leipzig: I.A. Barth und P.G. Kummer Publ., 766 p.

Detienne, M. (1964). Les origines religieuses de la notion d'intellect: Hermotimus et Anaxagore [The religious origins of the notion of intellect: Hermotimus and Anaxagora]. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger [Philosophical Review of France and Abroad]. Vol. 154, pp. 167–178.

Diogenes Laertius (1986). O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov [Lives, teachings, and sayings of famous philosophers]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 571 p.

Dodds, E.R. (2000). Greki i irratsional’noe [The Greeks and the irrational]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 507 p.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1993). Lektsii po istorii filosofii. T. 1 [Lectures on the history of philosophy. Vol. 1]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 352 p.

Lebedev, A.V. (ed.) (1989). Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Ch. I [Fragments of early Greek philosophers. Pt. 1]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 576 p.

Lebedev, A.V. (2014). Logos Geraklita. Rekonstruktsiya mysli i slova [The logos of Heraclitus. A reconstruction of thought and speech]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 533 p.

Losev, A.F. (1986). Diogen Laertsiy i ego metod [Diogenes Laertius and his method]. Diogen Laertsiy. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov [Diogenes Laertius. Lives, teachings, and sayings of famous philosophers]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 3–54.

Lucian of Samosata (2001). Pokhvala mukhe [The fly (praising a fly)]. Lukian Samosatskiy. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Lucian of Samosata. Works: in 2 vols]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., vol. 1, pp. 78–80.

Matveychev, O.A. (2017). Aristey Prokonneskiy — providets, svidetel’ Giperborei [Aristeas Prokonnessky — visionary, witness Hyperborea]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. No. 4, pp. 256–266.

Matveychev, O.A. (2016). K diskussii o genezise drevnegrecheskoy filosofii [To discussion on genesis of Ancient Greek philosophy]. Nauchnyy yezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Research Yearbook, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 16, iss. 4, pp. 5–16.

Matveychev, O.A. (2016). K diskussii o proiskhozhdenii drevnegrecheskoy filosofii v russkoy i sovetskoy filosofskoy mysli [To the discussion of genesis of Ancient Greek philosophy in Russian and soviet philosophical thought]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 6, pp. 185–199.

Matveychev, O.A. (2015). K voprosu o maloaziyskikh kornyakh ranney grecheskoy filosofii [On the problem of Asia minor’s origins of early Greek philosophy]. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Research Yearbook, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 41–66.

Matveychev, O.A. (2018). Plagiat Drevney Gretsii [Plagiarism of Ancient Greece]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. No. 1, pp. 188–202.

Matveychev, O.A. (2016). Sem’ chudes giperboreytsa Abarisa [Seven wonders of Abaris the Hyperborean]. Filosofskaya mysl’ [Philosophical Thought]. No. 5, pp. 26–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2016.5.18701

Meuli, K. (1935). Scythica [Scythian]. Hermes. Vol. 70, pp. 121–176.

Pindar (1980). Otryvki [Excerpts]. Pindar. Vakkhilid. Ody. Fragmenty [Pindar. Bacchilides. Odes. Fragments]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 275–284.

Pliny the Elder (2009). Estestvennaya istoriya. Kn. VII [The natural history. Book 12]. Adam i Eva. Al’manakh gendernoy istorii [Adam and Eve. Almanac gender history]. Moscow: IGH RAS Publ., no. 17, pp. 211–242.

Plutarch (1983). O demone Sokrata [On the Daimonion of Socrates]. Plutarkh. Sochineniya [Plutarch. Essays]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., pp. 501–536.

Rohde, E. (1895). Die Religion der Griechen [The religion of the Greeks]. Heidelberg: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von J. Hörning Publ., 47 p.

Rohde, E. (1925). Psyche: the cult of souls and the belief in immortality among the Greeks. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co Publ., 650 p.

Rozhanskiy, I.D. (1972). Anaksagor. U istokov antichnoy nauki [Anaxagoras. At the origins of ancient science]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 320 p.

Sextus Empiricus (1976). Protiv uchenykh [Against the scientists]. Sekst Empirik. Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Sextus Empiricus. Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 61–376.

Stratton-Kent, J. (2019). Geosofiya: magiya podzemnogo mira [Geosophia: The argo of magic]. Moscow: Telema Publ., 720 p.

Tertullian, K.S.F. (2004). O dushe [On the soul]. Saint Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko’s Publ., 256 p.

Windelband, W. (1995). Istoriya drevney filosofii [History of ancient philosophy]. Kiev: Tandem Publ., 368 p.

Zeller, E. (1881). A history of Greek philosophy from the earliest period to the time of Socrates. London: Longmans, Green, and Co Publ., vol. II, 541 p.

Received 30.04.2020

For citation:

Matveychev O.A. [Hermotimus of Clazomenae as Anaxagoras’s predecessor]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 3, pp. 355–364 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-355-364