ВЕСТНИК ПЕРМСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ

VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA. SERIYA FILOSOFIA PSIKHOLOGIYA SOTSIOLOGIYA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-516-527

Martin Buber: problem-historical understanding of man

Vladimir B. Kulikov
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor,
Professor of the Department of Theory, Methodology
and Law Support of State and Municipal AdministrationUral Federal University named after
the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin,
19, Mira st., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia;
e-mail: vbkulikov@list.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-1053

The philosophy of Martin Buber, a prominent representative of existentialism, is an anthropological project of understanding the crisis experience of man and society in the 20th century. The evolution of the dialogic idea in the direction of philosophical anthropology is caused by a new vision of historical perception of the problem of man. Moreover, social and personality-oriented motives were decisive in this process. The path of the problem, from Kant to the present, corresponded to what might be called a situation of reassessment of traditional European values. Buber searches for new spiritual foundations and worldview reference points. He researches the history of human thought and distinguishes between periods of «settledness», when man exists in a stable world, and periods of «homelessness», when man becomes aware of the homelessness of this world and there takes place his problematization, he becomes a problem for himself. The anthropological perspective is either embedded in cosmological, theological or logological constructions and loses its uniqueness, or acquires a real problematic nature and depth beyond all concepts and schemes. The dialogic perception of philosophical anthropology is organically complemented and supported by poetic practices of deep spiritual stories (Hasidism). The author suggests that, due to its complexity, contemporary social reality opens up new possibilities and clarifies the need for dialogue. Thus, study of M. Buber’s works by historians of philosophy is essential for an adequate understanding of the present and future of man and humanity.

Keywords: the problem of man, history of philosophy, dialogical principle, communication, Hasidism.

References

Bidlo, O. (2006). Martin Buber — Einvergessener Klassiker der Kommunikationswissenschaft? Dialog philosophie in kommunikations wissenschaft licher Perspektive [Martin Buber - A forgotten classic of communication science? Philosophy of dialogue from a communication science perspective]. Marburg: Tectum Publ., 278 p.

Buber, M. (1960). Urdistanz und Beziehun [Distance and relationship]. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider Publ., 39 p.

Buber, M. (1962). Werke: in 3 Bden. Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie [Works: in 3 vols. Vol. 1: Philosophical writings]. Munich: Kösel Publ., Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider Publ., 1128 p.

Buber, M. (1963). [Autobiographical Fragments]. Martin Buber (Philosophen des ХХ Jahrhundert) [Martin Buber (Philosophers of the 20 century)]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Publ., pp. 1–34.

Buber, M. (1963). [My Way to Hasidism]. Werke: in 3 Bden. Dritter Band: Schriften zum Chassidismus [Works: in 3 vols. Vol. 3: Writings on Hasidism]. Munich: Kösel Publ., Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider Publ., pp. 959–975.

Buber, M. (1995). Dva obrasa very [Two images of faith]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 464 p.

Buber, M. (2018). Der Weg des Menschen [The path of man]. Munich: Guttersloher Publ., 96 p.

Feuerbach, L. (1955). [The main provisions of the philosophy of the future]. Izbrannyye filosofskiye proizvedeniya: v 2 t.[Selected Philosophical Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow: IPL Publ., vol. 1, 676 p.

Kant, I. (1980). Traktaty i pisma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 712 p.

Lowit, K. (1975). [On the question of a Philosophical Anthropology]. Neue Anthropologie. Bd. 7: Philosophische Anthropologie [New Anthropology. Vol. 7: Philosophical Anthropology]. Stuttgart: G. Thieme Publ., pp. 330–342.

Nietzsche, F. (1990). Sobranie sochineniy. T. 2 [Works. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 830 p.

Riker, P. (1995). Konflikt interpretatsiy. Ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics]. Moscow: Medium Publ., 415 p.

Sloterdijk, P. (2021). Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma [Criticism of the cynical mind]. Saint Petersburg: I. Limbakh Publ., 796 p.

Van de Sant, R. (1977). Martin Bubers Bildnerische Tatigkeit zwischen beiden Weltkriegen [Martin Buber’s pedagogical activity between the two world wars]. Stuttgart: E. Klett Publ., 344 p.

Wehr, G. (1971). Martin Buber: Leben, Werk, Wirkung [Martin Buber: Life, work, impact]. Hamburg: Dtsch. Taschenbuch Publ., 116 p.

 

Received: 01.11.2021. Accepted: 30.11.2021

 

For citation:

Kulikov V.B. [Martin Buber: problem-historical understanding of man]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 4, pp. 516–527 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-516-527