DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-561-568
Chronotopy and topochrony of power in the context of the socio-political views of A. Kozhev and G.V.F. Hegel
Oleg K. Shevchenko
Candidate of Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social SciencesHumanitarian and Pedagogical Academy (branch)
of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University,
2-А, Sevastopolskaya st., Yalta, Republic of Crimea, 298635, Russia;
e-mail: filosofcrimea@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1362-2875
ResearcherID: B-8971-2018
The paper deals with spatiotemporal characteristics of power in the philosophical theory of A. Kozhev. It is argued that that Kozhev’s philosophy of power was based on the philosophy of power of G. Hegel. However, the spatiotemporal characteristics of Hegel’s power and Kozhev’s power are essentially different. Hegel’s power is totally topochronous, it absorbs temporality, leaving only formal chronology, whereas Kozhev’s power corresponds to the concept of «Chronotope». Developing the ideas of Hegel, A. Kozhev offers a philosophical theory of power in which time and space harmoniously merge in the format of co-existence. Kozhev refuses to speak of the historicity of power, devoting all his efforts to the study of the internal temporality of power and its manifestation at the phenomenal level. As such, he suggests seeing separate modes (in our terminology, chronotopes) of the space-time of power: «Father», «Master», «Leader» and «Judge». Special attention is paid to the dialectic of the finite and the infinite, the temporal and the chronological in the dynamics of Kozhev’s power. It is concluded that for Kozhev, power is always a living whole (a combination of «pure» types), which has its own genesis, its own field and duration of action, and its own death. It is proved that Kozhev’s philosophical concept remained incomplete, especially in the field of philosophy of law and philosophy of history. The analysis is based on Kozhev’s treatises: The Concept of Power, Introduction to Hegel’s Readings, Essay on the Phenomenology of Law, Tyranny and Wisdom. Materials of modern researchers, including translators of the philosophical heritage of A. Kozhev, are also extensively involved.
Keywords: topochrone, chronotope, power, phenomenology, philosophy of power, history of power, time of power, infinity, temporality of power, chronology of power.
References
Chernyh, S.S. and Shvachkina, L.A. (2017). [Anthropological circuits of power in A. Kojeve’s and M. Weber’s concepts: the experience of comparative analysis]. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii [Humanities of the South of Russia]. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 166–174.
Fukuyama, F. (2005). Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The end of history and the last man]. Moscow: AST Publ., 588 p.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2000). Fenomenologiya dukha [Phenomenology of the spirit]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 495 р.
Hegel, G.W.F. (2019). Nauka logiki [The science of logic]. Moscow: AST Publ., 959 p.
Kozhev, A. (2003). Vvedenie v chteniya Gegelya [Introduction to Hegel readings]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Pub., 792 p.
Kozhev, A. (2006). [Essay on the phenomenology of law: chapter 1]. Ateizm i drugie raboty [Atheism and other works]. Moscow:Praxis Publ., pp. 295–322.
Kozhev, A. (2006). Ponyatie vlasti [The concept of power]. Moscow: Praxis Publ., 192 р.
Kozhev, A. (2006). [Tyranny and wisdom]. Ateizm i drugie raboty [Atheism and other works]. Moscow: Praxis Publ., pp. 323–386.
Kucherova, A.O. (2020). [Hannah Arendt and Russian-French neo-hegelianism: Alexandre Kojeve/Alexandre Koyre]. Nauchnyy rezul’tat. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Research Result. Social Studies and Humanities]. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932x-2020-6-4-0-5
Kurilovich, I.S. (2019). [Thinking about (and of) the infinite as an epistemological problem of Kojève’s philosophical system]. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Philosophy Journal]. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 33–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-3-33-47
Molchanov, V.I. (2015). Fenomen prostranstva i proiskhozhdenie vremeni [The phenomenon of space and the origin of time]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 277 p.
Rusakov, S.S. (2018). [Comparative analysis of the concept of power in the philosophy of Alexandre Kojève and Carl Schmitt]. Politika i obschestvo [Politics and Society]. No. 10, pp. 18–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0684.2018.10.27690
Rutkevich, A.M. (2006). [Afterword]. Ponyatie vlasti [The concept of power]. Moscow: Praxis Publ., pp. 167–182
Rutkevich, A.M. (2019). [Genealogy of intellectuals by Alexander Kojève]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 12, pp. 118–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s004287440007531-9
Rutkevich, A.M., Drozdova, D.N. and Kurilovich, I.S. (2019). [Alexander Kojeve: Russian-French dialogue (review of the international colloquium)]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 8, pp. 215–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s004287440006059-9
Zekrist, R.I. (2012). [A. Kozhev’s Concept of Power]. Filologiya i kul’tura [Philology and Culture]. No. 2(28), pp. 253–258.
Received: 24.05.2021. Revised: 20.07.2021. Accepted: 16.08.2021
For citation:
Shevchenko O.K. [Chronotopy and topochrony of power in the context of the socio-political views of A. Kozhev and G.V.F. Hegel]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 4, pp. 561–568 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-561-568