DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-613-627

On the organization of a psycho-lexical study of the Russian personality trait taxonomy

Arina M. Mishkevich
Candidate of Psychology,
Senior Researcher of the School of PsychologyHSE University,
20, Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000, Russia;
e-mail: ArinaMishkevich@ya.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-3454
ResearcherID: Z-3500-2019

Sergei A. Shchebetenko
Doctor of Psychology, Docent,
Professor of the School of PsychologyHSE University,
20, Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000, Russia;
e-mail: sshchebetenko@hse.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-9731
ResearcherID: N-2935-2013

Alexey Yu. Kalugin
Candidate of Psychology, Docent,
Senior Researcher of the School of PsychologyHSE University,
20, Myasnitskaya st., Moscow, 101000, Russia;
e-mail: kaluginau@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-2926
ResearcherID: X-7824-2018

According the psycho-lexical hypothesis, any substantial individual differences in human behavior, emotions, cognition and motivation are supposed to be reflected in the language, which means that by analyzing the language one will be able to identify these differences. Further, using the factor analysis of self-reported individual differences, it is possible to identify the structure of personality traits. For example, based on a psycho-lexical study of English descriptors, the Big Five has been articulated. Meanwhile, the Russian taxonomy of personality traits has remained understudied. In the present article, we discuss some aspects of the organization of a psycho-lexical study. First, we analyze possible sources for the initial analysis of a language: free self-descriptions, everyday talks, dictionaries, etc. A conclusion is made about the advantage of using lists, normally dictionaries, compiled by professional linguists. In our future study, we also plan to use a similar list, namely, a corpus of the Russian language. Second, possible parts of speech taken as a basis for the analysis of words are discussed. Usually researchers focus on adjectives, less often they add nouns to the list. However, the analysis of scientific literature shows the need to use all possible parts of speech for such a study. In our research, we plan to use adjectives, nouns, adverbs, and verbs. Third, features of German and Dutch word selection methodologies are analyzed. We conclude that the German methodology may be preferable to the Dutch methodology in some aspects; therefore, we plan to employ the former in our study. Finally, the need for a psycho-lexical study in Russian and its blueprint are discussed.

Keywords: psycho-lexical approach, personality traits, Russian taxonomy, research organization.

Acknowledgements

The research was carried out with the financial support of the RSF, project No 21-18-00127.

References

Allport, G.W., and Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs. Princeton: Psychological Review Publications, Vol. 47, no. 1, 171 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360

Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., and Waller, N. G. (1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 69, iss. 2, pp. 300–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.300

Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., and John, O.P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: a psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 89–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040204

Ashton, M.C., and Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 15, iss. 5, pp. 327–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417

Barelds, D.P., and De Raad, B. (2015). The role of word-categories in trait-taxonomy: evidence from the Dutch personality taxonomy. International Journal of Personality Psychology. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–25.

Baumgarten, F. (1933). [The character traits]. Beiträge zur Charakter-und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Heft 1 [Contributions to character and personality research. Book 1]. Bern: A. Francke. 81 p.

Benet-Martínez, V., and Waller, N.G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality. Vol. 65, iss. 3, pp. 567–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00327.x

Bolinger, D. (1980). The loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London, New York: Longman Publ., 224 p.

Brokken, F.B. (1978). The language of personality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Groningen: University of Groningen.

Caprara, G.V., and Perugini, M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 8, iss. 5, pp. 357–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080502

Cattell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. Vol. 38, iss. 4, pp. 476–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116

Cheung, F.M., van de Vijver, F.J. and Leong, F.T. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist. Vol. 66, iss. 7, pp. 593–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389

Church, A.T., Katigbak, M.S., and Reyes, J.A.S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 3–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199603)10:1<3::aid-per234>3.0.co;2-m

Cramer, A.O., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M. et al. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 414–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866

De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060103

De Raad, B. (2000). The big five personality factors: the psycholexical approach to personality. Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publ., 128 S.

De Raad, B., and Barelds, D.P. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 94, iss. 2, pp. 347–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.347

De Raad, B., and Hoskens, M. (1990). Personality-descriptive nouns. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 131–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410040206

De Raad, B., and Mlačić, B. (2017). The lexical foundation of the Big Five factor model. The Oxford handbook of the five factor model. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.12

De Raad, B., Barelds, D.P., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F. et al. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 98, iss. 1, pp. 160–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017184

De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., and Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 19–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<19::aid-per290>3.3.co;2-y

De Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., and Hofstee, W.K. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020204

DeYoung, C.G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 56, pp. 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004

Di Blas, L., and Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality-descriptive adjectives in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 75–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199803/04)12:2<75::aid-per288>3.0.co;2-h

Egorova, M.S., Parshikova, O.V., Mitina, O.V. (2019) [Structure of the Russian variant of a six-factor HEXACO personality inventory]. Voprosy psihologii. Iss. 5, pp. 33–48.

Eysenck, H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. New York: Praeger, 308 p.

Fleeson, W., and Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 56, pp. 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009

Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publ., vol. 2, pp. 141–165.

Goldberg, L.R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Publ., vol. 1, pp. 203–234.

Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative «description of personality»: the Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 59, iss. 6, pp. 1216––1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216

Gorbaniuk, O., Czarnecka, E., and Chmurzyńska, M. (2011). Taxonomy of person-descriptive terms in Polish: A psycho-lexical study. Current Problems of Psychiatry. Vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 100–106.

Gorbaniuk, O., Korczak, A., Toruj, N., Czarnejko, A. et al. (2019). Comprehensive psycholexical classification of Polish person-descriptive terms. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. Vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 142–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.82792

Heine, S.J. and Buchtel, E.E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 60, pp. 369–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655

Hřebíčková, M. (2007). The lexical approach to personality description in the Czech context. Ceskoslovenská Psychologie [Czechoslovak Psychology]. Vol. 51, pp. 50–61.

Hromov, A.B. (2000). Pyatifaktornyj oprosnik lichnosti: ucheb.-metod. posobie [The Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire: Training Manual]. Kurgan: Izd-vo KGU. 23 p.

Kalugin, A.Yu., Shchebetenko, S.A., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J., John, O.P. (2021) [Psychometric Properties of the Russian Version of the Big Five Inventory-2]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33

Katigbak, M.S., Church, A.T., Guanzon-Lapeña, M.A., Carlota, A.J. and del Pilar, G.H. (2002). Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 82, iss. 1, pp. 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.89

Klages, L. (1929). The science of character. London: Allen & Unwin Publ., 308 p.

Knyazev, G.G., Mitrofanova, L.G. and Bocharov, A.V. (2010). [Validation of the Russian version of L. Goldberg’s «Big Five Factor Markers» questionnaire]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Psychology]. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 100–110.

Lee, K. and Ashton, M.C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 39, iss. 2, pp. 329–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

Martin, T.A., Costa, P.T., Oryol, V.E., Rukavishnikov, A.A., Senin, I.G. (2002). Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R. The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. Boston, MA: Springer Publ., pp. 261–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_13

McCrae, R.R. and Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 88, iss. 3, pp. 547–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547

Osin, E.N., Rasskazova, E.I., Neyaskina, Yu.Yu., Dorfman, L.Ya. and Aleksandrova, L.A. (2015). [Operationalization of the five-factor personality trait model on a Russian sample]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics]. Iss. 3, pp. 80–104.

Pohil’ko, V.I. and Fedotova, E.O. (1984). [The Repertory Grid Technique in Experimental Personality Psychology]. Voprosy psihologii. No. 3, pp. 151–157.

Saucier, G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 85, iss. 4, pp. 695–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695

Saucier, G. and Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality. Vol. 69, iss. 6, pp. 847–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696167

Schmitt, D.P., Allik, J., McCrae, R.R. and Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Vol. 38, iss. 2, pp. 173–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297299

Semin, G.R. and Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 558–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558

Shala, R.A., De Raad, B. and Arënliu, A. (2020). The structure of Albanian personality descriptive trait-adjectives: A psycho-lexically based taxonomy. International Journal of Personality Psychology. Vol. 6, pp. 1–11. Available at:https://ijpp.rug.nl/article/view/37224 (accessed 25.07.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.6.37224

Shchebetenko, S.A., Kalugin, A.Y., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J. and John, O, (2020). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory–2: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment. Vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901

Shmelev, A.G. and Pohil’ko, V.I. (1985). [Experimental approach to constructing a basic semantic dictionary of personality traits]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya [Herald of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology]. No. 14, pp. 3–10.

Shmelev, A.G., Pohil’ko, V.I. and Kozlovskaya-Tel’nova, A.Yu. (1991). [Representativeness of Personality Traits in the Mind of a Russian Language Speaker]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Journal of Psychology]. Vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 27–41.

Shmelyov, A.G. and Pokhil’ko, V.I. (1993). A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait names. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410070102

Singh, J.K., Misra, G. and De Raad, B. (2013). Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 27, iss. 6, pp. 605–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1940

Thalmayer, A.G., Saucier, G., Ole-Kotikash, L. and Payne, D. (2020). Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 119, iss. 5, pp. 1132–1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000264

Triandis, H.C. and Suh, E.M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 53, iss. 1, pp. 133–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200

Wiggins, J.S. (1968). Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 293–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.19.020168.001453

Yik, M.S.M. and Bond, M.H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology. Vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 75–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599308246919

Received: 17.08.2021. Accepted: 05.11.2021

 

For citation:

Mishkevich A.M., Shchebetenko S.A., Kalugin A.Yu. [On the organization of a psycho-lexical study of the Russian personality trait taxonomy]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 4, pp. 613–627 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-4-613-627