DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-126-132

A sign and a symbol

Maxim D. Gorbachev
Graduate student in PhilosophyLomonosov Moscow State University,
27/4, Lomonosovsky av., Moscow, 119991, Russia;
e-mail: mdgorbachevmsu@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-5889
ResearcherID: AGD-7154-2022

There exist rather contradictory interpretations of the concepts of sign and symbol. The author explores a number of approaches to their distinction in order to indicate the most appropriate one. Before proceeding to the approaches, the author turns to the concepts of a sign, sense and denotation, and comes to a conclusion that one of the reasons for the ambiguity of the relationship between a sign and a symbol lies in following the understanding of a sign and denotation provided by Frege. To study the problem outside of Frege’s theory, the author defines a sign as nothing more or less than what makes sense, and also expands the denotation by introducing the concept of an actual situation. Then, based on the proposed understanding of a sign and also the features of the category of sense, it is indicated what a sign or a symbol cannot be. In the course of consideration of various approaches to the distinction between a sign and a symbol, the author comes to a conclusion that the most promising of them is the separation of a special symbolic meaning. Despite the fact that both the sign and the symbol, provided it becomes possible to distinguish between them, will be the same at the level of the very presence of sense, we see the possibility of distinguishing a special, symbolic, sense based on its depth or sublimeness. However, these concepts are vague, so the first thing to do is to define a clear criterion that would make it possible to distinguish this symbolic sense among other senses, without narrowing the concept of a sign in order to artificially create a symbolic sense in the empty space left after such a narrowing.

Keywords: sign, symbol, sense, denotation, relation of a sign and a symbol, symbolic.

References

Frege, G. (1997). [Sense and denotation]. Frege G. Izbrannye raboty [Frege G. Selected works]. Moscow: Dom Intellektual’noy Knigi Publ., pp. 26–43. 

Girenok, F.I. (2012). Absurd i rech’. Antropologiya voobrazhaemogo [Absurdity and speech. Anthropology of the imaginary]. Moscow: Akademicheskiu Proekt Publ., 237 p.

Il’in, V.V., Kurenkov, I.O. and Ramazanov, S.O. (2012). [Symbol and sign: comparative analysis]. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge]. No. 3, pp. 303–314. 

Losev, A.F. (1993). [Things and naming]. Bytie. Imya. Kosmos [Being. Name. Space]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., P. 802–880.

Mel’nikova, I.V. (2006). [Reality of symbol]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik [Omsk Scientific Bulletin]. No. 6(42), pp. 21–24. 

Nikonenko, S.V. (2016). [On the question of the relationship between sign and symbol]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies]. No. 3, pp. 47–53. 

Ozlem Alp, K. (2010). A comparison of sign and symbol (their contents and boundaries). Semiotica. Vol. 2010, iss. 182, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2010.048

Rostova, N.N. (2017). Izgnanie Boga. Problema sakral’nogo v filosofii cheloveka [The exile of God. The problem of the sacred in human philosophy]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 432 p. 

Rudnev, V.P. (2016). Novaya model’ real’nosti [New model of reality]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 224 p. 

Saussure, F. (1977). Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on linguistics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 696 p. 

Shilkov, Yu.M. (2010). [Symbol and fiction (about fictitious features of the symbol)]. Kantovskiy sbornik [Kantian Journal]. No. 1(31), pp. 68–74. 

Spirova, E.M. (2007). [Sign of symbol?]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 1, pp. 110–114. 

Spirova, E.M. (2009). [Functions of symbol]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 2, pp. 205–211.

Received: 10.06.2021. Accepted: 16.10.2021

For citation:

Gorbachev M.D. [A sign and a symbol]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2022, issue 1, pp. 126–132 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-126-132