DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-2-232-241

Who needs this philosophy today? Part 2. What kind of philosophy is in demand in post-Soviet Russia

Lyeva A. Musayelyan
Doctor of Philosophy, Docent,
Head of the Department of PhilosophyPerm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: lmusaelyan@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-5871
ResearcherID: N-4762-2017

If philosophy is an epoch expressed in thoughts, then the worldview of a civilization in crisis cannot but be in a state of crisis. What the features of philosophy in crisis are was discussed in the first article. Civilization is communities, their elites, certain types of social individuals, formed under the influence of the consumer society and dehumanized curricula of educational institutions. What is the connection between fashionable modern philosophical schools of thought that represent the crisis tendencies of world philosophy and the interests of global and national elites that determine economic and educational policy in the world and in our country? To bring civilization out of the crisis and to find adequate answers to modern global challenges, society is in dire need of a philosophy with a solid heuristic and humanistic potential. Therefore, today the question of whether to teach philosophy at university or not cannot be discussed. The problem is that a civilization in crisis cannot be saved by philosophy that has been generated by this crisis and, moreover, penetrated into all spheres of public life, including education. In addition to postmodernism, which has become almost a craze for young Russian teachers and researchers in the last thirty years, in our country there are many supporters of the teachings of Husserl, Heidegger, and other Western thinkers representing non-classical trends in philosophy. In this regard, of great relevance today is the question of what kind of philosophy to teach at university and how to do it within the time limits allotted by the education reformers in order to form a personality that would possess social qualities making it possible to withstand modern challenges and threats.

Keywords: philosophy, postmodernism, globalization, education, commercialization, dehumanization, UNESCO Paris Declaration, teaching philosophy, educational process, social qualities of an individual.

References

Althusser, L. (2011). [Ideology and ideological apparatuses of the state]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas [Emergency Ration]. No. 3. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/2011/3/ideologiya-i-ideologicheskie-apparaty-gosudarstva.html (accessed12.12.2021).

Buzgalin, A.V. (2004). [Outdated postmodernism… (The decline of neoliberalism might be fraught with the danger of a «Proto-empire»)]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 2, pp. 3–15.

Chernikova, I.V. (2016). [Preservation of human nature as a global problem]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 9, pp. 36–43.

Dianova, V.M. (2011). [UNESCO initiatives in the field of improvement and development of philosophical education]. Filosofskoe obrazovanie [Philosophical Education]. No. 1(2), pp. 63–71.

Ershtein, L.B. (2021). [Excessive workload of university teachers as a factor of destruction of higher education in Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’no-issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki [PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin]. No. 2, pp. 75–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2021.2.6

Fukuyama, F. (2004). Nashe postchelovecheskoe buduschee. Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii [Our posthuman future. Consequences of the biotech revolution]. Moscow: AST Publ., 352 p.

Karpov, A.O. (2020). Znanie, sposobnoe porozhdat’ novoe znanie [Knowledge that can generate new knowledge: from the perspective of science and education]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 5, pp. 103–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-5-103-115

Khenner, E.K. (2018). [Professional knowledge and professional competencies in higher education]. Obrazovanie i nauka [The Education and Science Journal]. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 9–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018-2-9-31

Kutyrev, V.A. (1998). [Love for wisdom on the threshold of a new age]. Vestnik Moskvovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy]. No. 3, pp. 3–16.

Marinosyan, Kh.E. (2016). [Electronic civilization as a global perspective]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 6, pp. 7–31.

Mnatsakanyan, M.O. (2015). Postmodernizm: proiskhozhdenie, priroda i mesto v sovremennoy sotsiologii [Postmodernism: origin, nature and place in modern sociology]. Moscow: Yuniti-Dana Publ., 335 p.

Musaelyan, L.A. (2016). Istoricheskiy protsess i globalizatsiya [Historical process and globalization]. Perm, 128 p.

Musaelyan, L.A. (2014). [Russia in the 21st century: post-industrial civilization or the Middle Ages?]. Aktual’nye problemy sotsial’noy filosofii [Actual Problems of Social Philosophy]. Perm, pp. 188–207.

Panfilova, T.V. (2017). [Manifestation of postmodernism in our life]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 1, pp. 48–60.

[Paris Declaration on Philosophy]. Report by the Director-General on an intersectoral strategy on philosophy. UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000138673_rus (accessed 01.12.2021).

«Realisticheskiy povorot» v sovremennoy epistemologii, filosofii soznaniya i filosofii nauki? Materialy «kruglogo stola» (2017). [«Realistic turn» in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of mind and philosophy of science? Materials of «round table»]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 1, pp. 5–38.

Rozin, V.M. (2019). [Teaching philosophy: An optimization — liquidation or a new start?]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. Vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 42–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-2-42-57

Solov’ev, V.S. (1988). [Historical affairs of philosophy]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 8, pp. 118–125.

Soros, G. (2004). O globalizatsii [About globalization]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 224 p.

Received: 01.05.2022. Accepted: 27.05.2022

For citation:

Musayelyan L.A. [Who needs this philosophy today? Part 2. What kind of philosophy is in demand in post-Soviet Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2022, issue 2, pp. 232–241 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-2-232-241