DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-4-541-551

Alienated nature of human essence as the main content of the civilization crisis

Viktor O. Melnikov
Ph.D. Student of the Department of Philosophy

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: viktor_melnikov_psu@rambler.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0483-7364

The crisis state of the modern capitalist, global, ‘liquid’, neoliberal, etc. society (i.e. modern civilization) can be expressed in various aspects: economic, geopolitical, ecological, social-class, etc. However, all these aspects are only external manifestations, phenomena of a more fundamental problem — the crisis of human essence or, more specifically, its alienated nature. There are various approaches to understanding the human and its essence in modern philosophical literature. In this article, the author considers one of the versions of the Marxist representation of this subject, according to which the essence of the human is manifested in the mode of its existence, i.e. self-development through the transformation of all forms of matter. This method of the human’s production of its own life can be expressed in the form of a hierarchical structure of its essential attributes or forces. Such a plan of human essence is an abstract scheme that is modified in accordance with the concrete historical conditions of human existence, filling it with new content each time. Since the emergence of private property, classes and the state, the model of social development has been such that society as a whole develops due to the degradation of its individual members. This reaches its climax today, when the alienation of human from its generic essence, from its actual mode of existence turns it into a partial and one-dimensional. This process is understood by the authors as a crisis one since, apparently, it reveals a certain limit beyond which there takes place either the transition to a new model, where the development of each is a condition for the development of all, or — stagnation and destruction of the entire system.

Keywords: human essence, essential properties, labor, relations, consciousness, crisis of civilization, alienation.

References

An economy for 1 %. Oxfam briefing paper. 2016. Jan. 18. Available at: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf (accessed 29.09.2020).

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost’. Per. s angl. [Liquid modernity. Trans. from Eng.]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 240 p.

Dyer-Witheford, N. (2014). Cyber-proletariat: Global labour in the digital vortex. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/currentstudents/postgraduate/masters/modules/en9b5worldlitanthropocene/dyer-witheford_cyberproletariat-global_labour_in_the_digital_vortex.pdf (accessed 09.29.2020).

Frolov, I.T. (2008). Perspektivy cheloveka: opyt kompleksnoy postanovki problemy, diskussii, obobscheniya [Human perspectives: experience of complex problem formulation, discussions, generalizations]. Moscow: LKI Publ., 296 p.

Gritsenko, V.S. (2012). Trud v postindustrial’nom obschestve: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [The labor in post-industrial society: dissertation]. Perm: PSTU Publ., 221 p.

Il’enkov, E.V. (1979). Problema ideal’nogo [Problem of the ideal]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 6, pp. 128–140.

Koryakin, V.V. (2008). Trud i edinyy zakonomernyy istoricheskiy protsess [Labor and a single consistent historical process]. Perm: PSU Publ., pt. 2, 340 p.

Marcuse, H. (2003). Odnomernyy chelovek [One-dimensional man]. Moscow: AST Publ., 331 p.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955). Manifest kommunisticheskoy partii [The communist manifesto]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 4, pp. 419–459.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German ideology]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 3, pp. 7–544.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1961). Proiskhozdenie sem’i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [The origin of the family, private property and the state]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 21, pp. 23–178.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1974). Economichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 [Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 42, pp. 41–174.

Marx, K. (1960). Kapital. T. 1 [Capital. Vol. 1]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 23, 908 p.

Marx, K. (1961). Kapital. T. 3 [Capital. Vol. 3]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 25, pt. 1, 546 p.

Marx, K. (1955). Tezisy o Feyerbakhe [Theses on Feuerbach]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 3, pp. 1–4.

Orlov, V.V. and Vasil’eva, T.S. (2006). Filosofiya ekonomiki [Philosophy of the economy]. Perm: PSU Publ., 266 p.

Orlov, V.V. (1974). Materiya, razvitie, chelovek [The matter, development, human].Perm: PSU Publ., 397 p.

Ragozin, N.P. (2017). Problema vseobscheogo truda i ego otchuzdeniya v «Kapitale» K. Marksa [Problem of universal labour and its alienation in K. Marx’s «The Capital»]. Kult’ura i tsivilizatsiya [Culture and Civilization]. No. 2(6), pp. 36–59.

Srnicek, N. (2019). Kapitalizm platform [Platform capitalism]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 128 p.

Tomin, L.V. (2014). Sovremennye politicheskie konflikti: poststrusturalistskiy analiz [The modern political conflicts by poststructuralism analyses]. Saint Petersburg: SPBU Publ., 183 p.

Received 29.09.2020

For citation:

Melnikov V.O. [Alienated nature of human essence as the main content of the civilization crisis]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 4, pp. 541–551 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-4-541-551