DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-1-55-62
The problem of androgynous ideal of a human being in V.V. Rozanov’s philosophy of sex
Tatyana A. Ivanova
Ph.D. Student of the Department of Philosophical Anthropology
Lomonosov Moscow State University,
27/4, Lomonosovsky av., Moscow, 119991, Russia;
e-mail: froradelfa91@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-191X
ResearcherID: AAJ-5711-2021
The purpose of this article is a philosophical and anthropological analysis of the ideal of androgyne in V.V. Rozanov’s metaphysics of sex. The main focus is on the comparison of the destructive and constructive forms of the androgyne in his philosophy. According to the philosopher, destructive forms include people of «moonlight» or «third sex», who are considered the founders of New Testament Christianity, denying the life of the flesh. Constructive forms are the natural androgyny of a child and the androgyny of a married couple, which reveals itself in love, dynamics, mutual complementarity of a man and a woman. The paper draws parallels between N.A. Berdyaev’s and V.V. Rozanov’s concepts of androgyne, which are antipodal in terms of direction of thought but have common meanings. It is concluded that the similarity between the concepts lies in the understanding of gender as a dynamic and metaphysical principle that penetrates through not only the bodily but also the spiritual life of a person, and therefore cannot be rejected. The concepts are also similar in that they draw a boundary between the androgyne and the hermaphrodite, of which the former is the ideal of the human wholeness, while the latter is an unsuccessful attempt to achieve it. The differences between these philosophers consist in the priority of spiritual love in Berdyaev’s system and worldly, bodily love in Rozanov’s, as well as in a different understanding of the process of an androgyne being generated in a person, which, in Berdyaev’s conception, is individual and arises in each of the persons who are in love with each other, while, according to Rozanov, it is exclusively achievable in couples. The paper also pays attention to Rozanov’s own theology, which renews the Old Testament family ideals, offering the concept of God as a «sexual» being and proposing to consider the act of love within marriage as a sacred mystery that unites a person with God in co-creation. The study allows us to rethink the modern problems of gender self-determination of a person, returning to the metaphysical foundations of the Russian philosophy of gender, the main task of which was the synthesis of the spiritual and bodily principles in a person.
Keywords: androgyne, metaphysics of gender, philosophy of love, philosophical anthropology, Christianity, Eros.
References
Andreeva, N.I. (2005). Formirovaniye gendernoy kul’tury v sovremennom obshchestve: filosofsko-kul’turologicheskiy analiz: dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Formation of gender culture in modern society: philosophical and cultural analysis: dissertation]. Rostov-on-Don, 285 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2007). Dukh i real’nost’ [Spirit and reality]. Moscow: AST Publ., 384 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1989). Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [The philosophy of freedom. The meaning of creative act]. Moscow: Pravda Publ., 608 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1931). O naznachenii cheloveka. Opyt paradoksal’noy etiki [The destiny of man. Experience of paradoxical ethics]. Paris: YMKA-Press, 320 p.
Chistova, M.V. (2004). Kontsept androgina v zhyznetvorchestve Z.N. Gyppyus: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [The concept of androgyne in the creative life of Z.N. Gippius: dissertation]. Kostroma, 188 p.
Chukovskiy, K.I. (2017). Sobraniye sochineniy: v 15 t. T. 7: Literaturnaya kritika [Collected works: in 15 vols. Vol. 7: The literary criticism. 1908–1915]. Moscow: Agentstvo FTM, Ltd Publ., 736 p.
Eriugena, J.S. (2001). [The division of nature]. Antologiya srednevekovoy mysli. Teologiya i filosofiya evropeyskogo Srednevekovya: in 2 vols [Anthology of the thought of medieval ages. Theology and philosophy of European Medievalism]. Saint Petersburg: RCGI Publ., vol. 1, pp. 166–189.
Girenok, F.I. (2014). Figury i skladki [Figures and Folds]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., 244 p.
Platon. (2019). Dialogi. Apologiya Sokrata [Dialogues. The apology of Socrates]. Moscow: AST Publ., 352 p.
Rozanov, V.V. (1904). V mire neyasnogo i nereshennogo [In a world of uncertainty and undecided]. Saint Petersburg: M. Merkushev Publ., 358 p.
Rozanov, V.V. (1911). Lyudi lunnogo sveta. Metafizika khristianstva [People of moonlight. Metaphysics of Christianity]. Saint Petersburg, 199 p.
Rozanov, V.V. (1995). Sobraniye sochineniy. T. 6: V mire neyasnogo i nereshennogo. Iz vostochnykh motivov [Collected works. Vol. 6: In a world of uncertainty and undecided. From Eastern motifs]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 464 p.
Rozanov, V.V. (2001). Uyedinennoye. Opavshiye list’ya. Apokalipsis nashego vremeni. Stat’i o russkikh pisatelyakh [Solitary. Selections from fallen leaves. The apocalypse of our time. Papers of Russian writers]. Moscow: Slovo Publ., 776 p.
Shestakov, V.P. (1999). Eros i kul’tura: filosofiya lyubvi i yevropeyskoye iskusstvo [The philosophy of Eros and European art]. Moscow: Respublika Publ.; TERRA-Knizhnyy Klub Publ., 464 p.
Shklovskiy, V.B. (2015). Rozanov: iz knigi «Syuzhet kak yavleniye stilya» [Rozanov: from the book «Plot as phenomenon of style»]. N.P.: Salamandra P.V.V. Publ., 32 p.
Received: 25.09.2020. Revised: 17.11.2020. Accepted: 06.12.2020
For citation:
Ivanova T.A. [The problem of androgynous ideal of a human being in V.V. Rozanov’s philosophy of sex]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 1, pp. 55–62 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-1-55-62