DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-2-166-178
The philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche: Nikolai Berdyaev’s reception and interpretation
Andrey V. Shumskoy
Ph.D. in Historiy,
Associate Professor of the Department of Social Sciences and Humanities
Ural State University of Physical Education,
1, Ordzhonikidze st., Chelyabinsk, 454091, Russia;
e-mail: shav.82@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-8754
ResearcherID: AAS-4956-2021
The article deals with the problem of Nikolai Berdyaev’s reception and interpretation of the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. We attempt to reconstruct Berdyaev’s attitude to the creative heritage of the great German philosopher. The phenomenon of Nietzsche was mainly perceived by the Russian philosophy of the early 20th century in a religious context. For Berdyaev himself, the personality of Nietzsche became one of the starting points for comprehending the existential dialectic of human destiny in the world historical process. In Nietzsche’s works, Berdyaev was first of all captivated by the eschatological theme the philosopher addressed, his striving for the end and the limit. Berdyaev called Nietzsche the greatest phenomenon of modern history, dialectically completing the humanistic anthropology of the West. The Russian philosopher viewed Nietzsche as the forerunner of a new religious anthropology, a religious prophet of the West, making a return to the old European humanism no longer possible. Berdyaev was convinced of the need to overcome and internalize the spiritual experience of Nietzsche. The latter opens up the prospect of transition to a new anthropological era, in which human existence must be justified by creativity. Berdyaev viewed creativity as a new religious revelation of Christianity, not manifested in patristic tradition and historical Christianity. In creative acts, man overcomes objectification as a fallen state of the world. The article examines the key ideas of Nietzsche’s philosophy through the prism of religious existentialism and personalism of Berdyaev. Berdyaev’s attitude to Nietzsche was ambivalent: on the one hand, he highly appreciated how radically the German philosopher formulated the problem of a person’s creativity; on the other hand, he viewed the anti-Christian concept of the superman, leading to human godhood, as absolutely unacceptable for Russian religious philosophy and Christianity. Berdyaev assessed the new revelation of Nietzsche about the superman and the will to power as false and demonic, radically contradicting the foundations of Christian anthropology about man and the religious ethics of creativity.
Keywords: Friedrich Nietzsche, Nikolai Berdyaev, Christian anthropology, humanism, existentialism, personalism, ethics of creativity, morality, religious philosophy.
References
Berdyaev, N.A. (1929). [The tree of life and the tree of knowledge]. Put’ [The Way]. No. 18, pp. 88–106.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1995). Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [The kingdom of God and the kingdom of Caesar]. Moscow: Republic Publ., 383 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1996). Istina i otkrovenie. Prolegomeny k kritike Otkroveniya [Truth and revelation. Prolegomena to the criticism of Revelation]. Saint Petersburg: RHGI Publ., 384 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1999). Novoe religioznoe soznanie i obschestvennost’ [New religious consciousness and society]. Moscow: Canon + Publ., 464 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2002). Smysl istorii. Novoe srednevekov’e. [The meaning of history. New middle ages]. Moscow: Canon + Publ., 448 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2002). Sub specie aeternitatis. Opyty filosofskie, sotsial’nye i literaturnye (1900–1906 gg.). [Sub specie aeternitatis. Philosophical, social and literary experiments (1900–1906)]. Moscow: Canon + Publ., 656 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2003). Opyt paradoksal’noy etiki [The experience of paradoxical ethics]. Moscow: AST Publ., Kharkov: Folio Publ., 702 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2004). Smysl tvorchestva: Opyt opravdaniya chelovekom [The meaning of creativity: The experience of human justification]. Moscow: AST Publ., Kharkov: Folio Publ., 678 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2005). Dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo [The dialectic of the divine and the human]. Moscow: AST Publ.; Kharkov: Folio Publ., 623 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2007). Dukh i real’nost’: Osnovy bogochelovecheskoy dukhovnosti. Ya i mir ob’ektov: Opyt filosofii odinochestva i obscheniya [Spirit and reality: fundamentals of divine-human spirituality. The self and the world of objects: an experience of the philosophy of solitude and communication]. Moscow: AST Publ., 382 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2007). Padenie svyaschennogo russkogo tsarstva: Publitsistika 1914–1922 [The fall of the sacred Russian kingdom: Journalism 1914-1922]. Moscow: Astrel’ Publ., 1184 p.
Berdyaev, N.A. (2008). Sub’ektivizm i individualizm v obschestvennoy filosofii. Kriticheskiy etyud o N.K. Mikhaylovskom [Subjectivism and individualism in social philosophy. The critical essay on N.K. Mikhailovsky]. Moscow: Astrel’ Publ., 1008 p.
Bonetskaya, N.K. (2009). [Apotheosis of creativity (N. Berdyaev and F. Nietzsche)]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 4, pp. 85–106.
Bonetskaya, N.K. (2013). [Russian Nietzsche]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy]. No. 7, pp. 133–143.
Sineokaya, Y.V. (1999). [The turn of the century: the Russian destiny of Nietzsche’s Superman]. Fridrikh Nitshe i filosofiya v Rossii: sbornik statey [Friedrich Nietzsche and philosophy in Russia: collection of articles]. Saint Petersburg: RCHI Publ., pp. 58–74.
Sineokaya, Y.V. (2001). [Russian nietzscheanism]. Nitshe: pro et contra. Antologiya [Nietzsche: pro et contra. Anthology]. Saint Petersburg: RCHI Publ., pp. 2–29.
Sineokaya, Y.V. (2019). [Foreword. Nietzsche’s work in the historical and philosophical context]. Nitshe segodnya [Nietzsche today]. Moscow: YASK Publ., pp. 7–40.
Sineokaya, Y.V. and Poliakova, E.A. (2017). [Introduction: Nietzsche today]. Fridrikh Nitshe: nasledie i proekt [Friedrich Nietzsche: heritage and project]. Moscow: YASK Publ., pp. 15–23.
Received: 20.01.2021. Accepted: 18.02.2021
For citation:
Shumskoy A.V. [The philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche: Nikolai Berdyaev’s reception and interpretation]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 2, pp. 166–178 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-2-166-178