From classical anthropology to «anthropotechnic». And back?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-318-325
From classical anthropology to «anthropotechnic». And back?
Andrey V. Popovkin
Candidate of Philosophy,
Head of the Department of Philosophy
Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East,
Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences,
89 Pushkinskaya st., Vladivostok, 690001, Russia;
e-mail: andrey.popovkin@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-9448
ResearcherID: AAJ-7424-2021
The article attempts to consider in general terms the evolution of anthropology, understood, on the one hand, as a special view of human nature and, on the other hand, as a method of human formation. The paper deals with the relationship between the views on human nature and the goals and strategies of education. Special attention is paid to the Humboldt model of education as the most complete and consistent embodiment of modern anthropology. A hypothesis is put forward and substantiated about the correlation of the dispute between Socrates and the sophists with the opposition of the Humboldt and postmodern models of education and views on human nature. The essence of this confrontation is in two different views on a person: proceeding from the goal of a person or proceeding from his actual factuality. The former view corresponds to the anthropology and pedagogy of Socrates and the culture of modernity, the latter — to the sophists and the culture of postmodernity. Postmodern culture gives rise to posthumanism, which looks at a person as a kind of aggregate of properties and abilities. The educational strategy corresponding to it consists in the desire to «upgrade» a person, to supplement or discard something in order to maximize his situational adaptation to the changing reality and to increase the existing set of possibilities in each here-and-now. The term «anthropotechnics» in its mechanistic meaning is more relevant to such a view and attitude towards a person. An assumption is made and arguments are presented that behind various types of «anthropotechnics», ethical relativism, and the like, one can see the intention of the elites to construct the image of a person they need. At the end of the paper, a question is raised about the possibility of turning from «anthropotechnics» to a new anthropology. It is shown that this anthropology should be based on the desire to see a real person, that is, to see in him the main behind the cover of the accidental and secondary, without falling into abstract idealization. The philosophical concepts of E. Husserl and S.N. Trubetskoy are proposed as a promising basis.
Keywords: anthropology, humanism, education, Humboldt University, postmodernity.
References
Ado, P. (2005). Dukhovnye uprazhneniya i antichnaya filosofiya [Spiritual exercise and ancient philosophy]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Stepnoy Veter Publ.; Kolo Publ., 448 p.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2010). Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia]. Yekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya Publ.; Moscow: Astrel’ Publ., 895 p.
Fichte, I.G. (2000). [A clear message to the general public as clear as the sun about the true essence of modern philosophy]. Fakty soznaniya. Naznachenie cheloveka. Naukouchenie [Facts of consciousness. The appointment of a person. Science studies]. Minsk: Harvest Publ., Moscow: AST Publ., pp. 273–390.
Fuko, M. (2008). [Technology yourself]. Logos. No. 2(65), pp. 96–122.
Humboldt, W. (1993). Werke. Bd. 4: Schriften zur Politik und zum Bildungswesen [Factories. Vol. 4: Writings on politics and education]. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Stuttgart, 590 p.
Humboldt, W. (2018). Ideen zu einem Versuch die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen [Ideas for an attempt to determine the limits of the effectiveness of the state]. 224 p. Available at: https://www.dreigliederung.de/essays/1792-wilhelm-von-humboldt-ideen-zu-einem-versuch-die-grenzen-der-wirksamkeit-des-staates-zu-bestimmen (accessed 25.07.2021).
Husserl, E. (2001). Kartezianskie razmyshleniya [Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 316 p.
Jaeger, W. (2001). Paydeyya. Vospitanie antichnogo greka. T. 1. [Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Greko-Latinskiy Kabinet Yu.A. Shichalina Publ., 594 p.
Kolesnikov, A. (2017). [Prophet competition: betting on growth motivation and behavioral economics]. Economy Times. Oct. 24. Available at: http://economytimes.ru/?q=kurs-rulya/konkurs-prorokov-stavka-na-motivaciyu-rosta-i-povedencheskuyu-ekonomiku (accessed 25.07.2021).
Lyotard, Zh.-F. (1998). Sostoyanie postmoderna [The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge]. Moscow: IES Publ., Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 160 p.
[Mikhail Kovalchuk’s speech at the Federation Council on September 30, 2015]. Troitskiy variant – Nauka [Troitsk variant – Science]. Oct. 8. Available at: https://trv-science.ru/2015/10/vystuplenie-mikhaila-kovalchuka-v-sf/ (accessed 25.07.2021).
Nussbaum, M. (2014). Ne radi pribyli: zachem demokratii nuzhny gumanitarnye nauki [Not for profit: why democracy needs the humanities]. Moscow: HSE Publ., 192 p.
Paskal, B. (2004). Mysli [Thoughts]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 336 p.
Plato (1993). [Theaetetus]. Platon. Sobranie sochineniy v 4 t. [Plato. Collected works: in 4 vols].. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 2, pp. 192–274.
Trubetskoy, S.N. (1994). [About the nature of human consciousness]. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., p.481–592.
Received: 01.08.2021. Accepted: 31.08.2021
For citation:
Popovkin A.V. [From classical anthropology to «anthropotechnic». And back?]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2021, issue 3, pp. 318–325 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2021-3-318-325