DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-406-419

Moral activity of a person as a system

Alexandr O. Ryazhkin
Ph.D. Student of the Department of Psychology

Chelyabinsk State University,
129, Kashirin brothers str., Chelyabinsk, 454001, Russia;
e-mail: aoryazhkin@gmail.com
ORCID: 0000-0001-8309-8047

This article focuses on the problem of moral activity of a person, as a highest form of social activity, in terms of the system-subject approach. This approach considers moral activity as a dynamic system represented in the subject-personality continuum. The author distinguishes components of moral activity represented in both spheres: in the sphere of personality and in the subject sphere. As part of a personality, moral activity acts as a value-semantic sphere, which determines the direction of personal activity. In the subject sphere, moral activity is manifested through its main function: regulation of behavior. To investigate the behavior regulation function, the author used the mental construct «control of behavior», which allows one to investigate activity regulation on three levels: emotions, will and cognition. To substantiate this approach, the author conducted an empirical correlation research. The purpose of this research was to find the most significant relations between the components of moral activity. Students of Chelyabinsk State University were the sample group. The author used the following methods for studying the value-semantic sphere: «Life-meaning Sense of Orientation» by D. Leontiev and «Value Questionnaire» by Sh. Shvarts. Several different methods were used to study the subject sphere of moral activity: «Behavior Self-regulation Style» by V. Morosanova, «Control Over the Action» by Yu. Kul and «Methods of Coping Behavior» by R. Lazarus. These methods were applied for the investigation of cognitive, will and emotional levels of behavior control, respectively. The research results allow us to suppose the existence of a moral activity dynamic system, represented in the personal and subject spheres, and to identify certain features of the investigated phenomenon. Moreover, the received results support theoretical foundations applied to the term «moral activity».

Keywords: morality, moral activity, social activity, system, subject, personality, system-subject approach, emotional control, control of will, cognitive control.

References

Antilogova, L.N. (2003). O vzaimosvyazi tsennostnykh orientatsiy i nravstvennoy aktivnosti lichnosti [On the relations between value orientations and moral activity of the person]. Sibirskaya psikhologiya segodnya: sb. nauch. trudov [Siberian Psychology today: col. of scientific works]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., iss. 2, pp. 13–17.

Antilogova, L.N. (2016). Tsennostnye orientatsii kak forma vyrazheniya nravstvennoy aktivnosti lichnosti [Values as a form of manifesting a person’s moral activity]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitelnykh organakh [Psychopedagogics in Law Enforcement]. No. 4(67), pp. 23–25.

Asmolov, A.G. (1990). Psikhologiya lichnosti [Psychology of personality]. Moscow: MSU, 284 p.

Bodlevskiy, M.I. (1976). Nravstvennaya svoboda i otvetstvennost lichnosti [Moral freedom and responsibility of the personality]. Minsk: Znanie Publ., 18 p.

Bodrov, V.A. (2006). Psikhologicheskiy stress: razvitie i preodolenie [Psychological stress: development and coping]. Moscow: PER SE Publ., 528 p.

Borovskiy, M.N. (1974). Moralnye potrebnosti i ikh rol v nravstvennom povedenii molodezhi [Moral needs and their role in the moral behavior of young people]. Moscow, 146 p.

Bratus, B.S. (1988). Anomalii lichnosti [Anomalies of personality]. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 348 p.

Franken, E.R. (2003). Motivatsiya povedeniya: biologicheskie, kognitivnye i sotsialnye aspekty [Human Motivation]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 651 p.

Golovin, S.Yu. (1998). Slovar prakticheskogo psikhologa [Dictionary of practical psychologist]. Minsk: Kharvest Publ., 551 p.

Kant I. (1965). Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti [Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals]. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 348 p.

Karandashev, V.N. (2004). Metodika Shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostey lichnosti: kontseptsiya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Schwartz’s method for studying the values of personality: the concept and methodological guidance]. Saint Petersburg: Rech Publ., 70 p.

Klimov, E.A. (1996). Psikhologiya professionalnogo samoopredeleniya [Psychology of professional self-determination]. Rostov on Don: Feniks Publ., 304 p.

Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development. Vol. I: The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 441 p. DOI: 10.1017/S0360966900024452.

Kulagina, I.Yu. and Kolyutskiy, V.N. (2001). Vozrastnaya psikhologiya: Polnyy zhiznennyy tsikl razvitiya cheloveka [Age psychology: The full life cycle of human development]. Moscow: Sfera Publ., 464 p.

Kurilenko, Yu.A. (2014). The sphere of senses as a structural element of personality [Smyslovaya sfera kak strukturnyy element lichnosti]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitelnykh organakh [Psychopedagogics in Law Enforcement]. No. 2(57), pp. 20–23.

Lapina, T.S. (1969). Sotsialnaya aktivnost kak faktor i vyrazhenie nravstvennogo razvitiya lichnosti [Social activity as a factor and expression of the personality moral development]. Nravstvennoe razvitie lichnosti [Moral development of the personality]. Moscow: Moskovskiy rabochiy Publ., pp. 123–146.

Lasarus, R. and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer, 456 p. DOI: 10.1017/S0141347300015019.

Leontev, D.A. (2003). Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy realnosti [Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of the semantic reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 487 p.

Morosanova, V.I. (1998). Individualnyy stil samoregulyatsii: fenomen, struktura i funktsii v proizvolnoy aktivnosti cheloveka [Individual style of self-regulation: the phenomenon, structure and functions in random human activity]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 191 p.

Sergienko, E.A. (2011). Sistemno-subektnyy podkhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva [System-subject approach: grounds and perspectives ]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 120–132.

Sergienko, E.A., Vilenskaya, G.A. and Kovaleva, Yu.V. (2010). Kontrol povedeniya kak subektnaya regulyatsiya [Behavioral control as subject’s regulation]. Moscow: Institute of psychology of RAS, 352 p.

Zaytseva, I.A. (2008). Nravstvennaya aktivnost lichnosti, suschnost ee i komponenty [Moral activity of the personality, its essence and components]. Materials of conference «Personality – word – society» – 2008. Available at: http://www.pws-conf.ru/nauchnaya/lss-2008/203-lichnost-otnosheniya/5633-nravstvennaya-aktivnost-l (accessed 16.05.2016).

Zhuravlev, A.L. (2011). Aktualnye problemy sotsialno orientirovannykh otrasley psikhologii [Actual problems of psychology socially oriented branches]. Moscow: Institute of psychology of RAS, 560 p.

Znakov, V.V. (2005). Psikhologiya subekta i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [The psychology of the subject and the psychology of human existence]. Subekt, lichnost i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Subject, personality and psychology of human existence]. Moscow: Institute of psychology of RAS, pp. 9–44.

Zotov, N.D. (1984). Lichnost kak subekt nravstvennoy aktivnosti: priroda i stanovlenie [Personality as a subject of moral activity: nature and becoming]. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publ., 248 p.

Received 13.03.2018

For citation:

Ryazhkin A.O. Moral activity of a person as a system // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 3. P. 406–419. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-406-419