Who needs this philosophy today? Part 1 Why there is some doubt about the need to teach philosophy in Russian universities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-78-90

Who needs this philosophy today? Part 1. Why there is some doubt about the need to teach philosophy in Russian universities

Lyeva A. Musayelyan
Doctor of Philosophy, Docent,
Head of the Department of PhilosophyPerm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: lmusaelyan@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-5871
ResearcherID: N-4762-2017

Culture is a synthetic characteristic of the level of development of human essence, manifested in human activity and the results of this activity, which include philosophy. However, philosophy is not an «ordinary» component of culture, it is «the quintessence of human culture» (Marx). The complexity of understanding a person as a universal social being and the versatility of his activities are the factors that determine the discussions in the interpretation of the essence of philosophy, its tasks, functions, and role in public life. According to the well-known definition of Hegel, philosophy is an epoch expressed in thoughts. To know an era or a particular society, it is necessary to study and understand their philosophy since it is an indicator of the state the existing social reality is in. The historical process is an expression of the developing human essence, which is also manifested in the development of philosophy itself. However, this process is of a contradictory, heterogeneous character, with powerful upsurges alternating with crises, which are also felt in philosophy itself. On the other hand, the state of philosophy is not a simple mirror reflection of the nature of the processes taking place in social reality. Here, as history shows, there is a mutual conditioning. Philosophy can contribute to the deepening of crisis tendencies in public life, but it can also help bring society out of a deep crisis and even change the vector of its historical movement.

Keywords: philosophy and social reality, crisis of civilization, intellectual crisis of modern society, human depersonalization, desubjectivization of social individuals, postmodernism.

References

Baudrillard, J. (2000). V teni molchalivogo bol’shinstva, ili Konets sotsial’nogo [In the shadow of the silent majorities, or, the end of the social]. Ekaterinburg: UrSU Publ., 96 p.

Baudrillard, J. (2015). Simulyakry i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and simulation]. Moscow: Postum Publ., 240 p.

Bubentsova, K. (1998). [Philosophy as the practice of creating concepts]. Deleuze J., Guattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya?[Deleuze J., Guattari F. What is philosophy?]. Moscow: IEP Publ., St. Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., pp. 4–5.

Deleuze, J. (2004). [About philosophy]. Deleuze J. Peregovory. 1972–1990 [Deleuze J. Negotiations. 1972–1990]. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 176–202.

Deleuze, J. and Guattari, F. (1998). Chto takoe filosofiya? [What is philosophy?]. Moscow: IES Publ., St. Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 288 p.

Deleuze, J. and Guattari F. (2004). [Discourse on «Anti-Oedipus»]. Deleuze J. Peregovory. 1972–1990 [Deleuze J. Negotiations. 1972–1990]. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 25–40.

Derrida, J. (1992). Pis’mo yaponskomu drugu [Letter to a Japanese friend].Voprosy Filosofii. No. 4, pp. 53–57.

Fromm, E. (2000). [To have or to be?]. Fromm E. Velichie i ogranichennost’ teorii Freyda [Greatness and limitations of Freud’s thought]. Moscow: AST Publ., pp. 185–437.

Glavatskiy, M.E. (2002). «Filosofskiy parokhod»: god 1922-y. Istoriograficheskie trudy [«Philosophical steamboat»: the year 1922: Historiographic studies]. Ekaterinburg: UrSU Publ., 224 p.

Gobozov, I.A. (2005). Kuda katitsya filosofiya?! Ot poiska istiny k postmodernistskomu trepu [Who needs such philosophy? From the search for truth to postmodernism chatter]. Moscow: Savin S.A. Publ., 202 p.

Gobozov, I.A. (2009). [Globalization and primitivization of society]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 2(54), pp. 5–19.

Gobozov, I.A. (2010). [Intellectual crisis of society]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 3(59), pp. 5–21.

Graham, L.R. (1991). Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauki o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze [Science, philosophy, and human behavior in the Soviet Union]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 480 p.

Gubanov, N.I. (2007). [The poverty of the philosophy of postmodernism]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 1(45), pp. 54–68.

Hildebrand, D. fon (1997). Chto takoe filosofiya? [What is philosophy?]. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 373 p.

Kamenskiy, Z.A. (1995). Filosofiya kak nauka: klassicheskaya traditsiya i sovremennye spory [Philosophy as a science: classical tradition and modern disputes]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 175 p.

Kapitsa, S.P. (2002). [Foreword to the translation of the book «Intellectual Tricks» by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont]. Sokal A., Brikmon Zh. Intellektual’nye ulovki. Kritika sovremennoy filosofii postmoderna [Sokal A., Brickmon J. Intellectual tricks.Criticism of modern postmodern philosophy]. Moscow: Dom Intellektual’noy Knigi Publ., pp. 6–8.

Lektorskiy, V.A. (2017). [Why is philosophy needed today?]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 7, pp. 140–143.

Likhachev, D.S. (2018). Zametki i nablyudeniya. Iz zapisnykh knizhek raznykh let [Notes and observations. From notebooks of different years]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka Publ., 448 p.

Livshits, R.L. (2020). [Philosophical lesson «Philosophical ship»]. Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy]. Iss. 7(28), pp. 207–216.

Malinov, A.V. and Troitskiy, S.A. (2013). [Russian philosophy banned (to the 90th anniversary of the «Philosophical Steamboat»)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review]. No. 1(119), pp. 53–66.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1992). [On understanding philosophy]. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu[Mamardashvili M.K. On understanding philosophy]. Moscow: Progress Publ., Kul’tura Publ., pp. 14–26.

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1992). [To be a philosopher is fate]. Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu[Mamardashvili M.K. On understanding philosophy]. Moscow: Progress Publ., Kul’tura Publ., pp. 27–40.

Marx, K. (1968). [Economic Manuscripts 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols.]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ.,Vol. 46, pt. 1, pp. 3–510.

Mezhuev, V.I. (2008). [Philosophy in modern culture]. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Philosophy Journal]. No. 1, pp. 14–23.

Mezhuev, V.I. (2017). [Philosophy as an ideology]. Filosofskiy zhurnal [Philosophy Journal]. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2017-10-4-171-180

Mironov, V.V. (2005). Filosofiya i metamorfozy kul’tury [Philosophy and metamorphoses of culture]. Moscow: SovremennyeTetradi Publ., 424 p.

Momdzhyan, K.Kh. (2021). [Returning to the search for truth: once again on the status of contemporary social philosophy]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 2, pp. 29–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-2-29-41

Musaelyan, L.A. (2000). [To the question of the scientific nature of philosophy]. Novye idei v filosofii: sbornik nauch. trudov[New Ideas in Philosophy: collect. of scientific works]. Perm, iss. 9, pp. 196–205.

Musaelyan, L.A. (2016). Istoricheskiy protsess i globalizatsiya [Historical process and globalization]. Perm: PSU Publ., 128 p.

Nikiforov, A.L. (1989). [Is philosophy a science?]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 6, pp. 52–62.

Nikitenko, A.V. (1955). Dnevnik: v 3 t. T. 1: 1826–1857 [Diary: in 3 vols. Vol. 1: 1826–1857]. Moscow: Goslitizdat Publ., 543 p.

Oizerman, T.I. (1982). Problemy istoriko-filosofskoy nauki [Problems of historical and philosophical science]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 301 p.

Otkliki na stat’yu A.L. Nikiforova «Yavlyaetsya li filosofiya naukoy?» [Responses to the article by A.L. Nikiforova «Is philosophy a science?»] (1989). Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 12, pp. 69–79.

Otkliki na stat’yu A.L. Nikiforova «Yavlyaetsya li filosofiya naukoy?» [Responses to the article by A.L. Nikiforova «Is philosophy a science?»] (1990). Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 1, pp. 82–87.

Ratnikov, V.P. (2002). [Postmodernism: origins, formation, essence]. Filosofiya i obschestvo [Philosophy and Society]. No. 4(29), pp. 120–132.

Rorti, R., Vattimo, Dzh. and Zabala, S. (2008). [What is the future of religion after metaphysics?]. Logos. No. 4(67), pp. 93–110.

Sokal, A. and Brikmon, Zh. (2002). Intellektual’nye ulovki. Kritika sovremennoy filosofii postmoderna [Intellectual tricks. Criticism of modern postmodern philosophy]. Moscow: Dom Intellektual’noy Knigi Publ., 248 p.

Received: 26.01.2022. Accepted: 05.03.2021

For citation:

Musayelyan L.A. [Who needs this philosophy today? Part 1. Why there is some doubt about the need to teach philosophy in Russian universities]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2022, issue 1, pp. 78–90 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-1-78-90

Категория: Наука.