DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-352-363

Essence, prerequisites and self-identification of transhumanism movement

Roman N. Gaishun
Post-graduate Student of the «Analysis of Social Systems and Processes» Program,
Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev str., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: gaishun-roman@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0003-1979-3234

Theoretical concepts and manifestations of transhumanism require adequate assessment from the perspective of modern scientific philosophy. This study aims to determine the essence of transhumanism, to identify its main objective (socio-economic) and theoretical prerequisites, and to show the connection of transhumanism with other branches of philosophy, science, social and political thought. The article provides a general description of transhumanism as a direction of thought and a social movement, which is done with the consideration of both self-definitions of transhumanism thinkers and criticism toward them. The author attempts to obtain a new complex definition of transhumanism based on the materials studied. The article lists major problems lying in the sphere of interest of the transhumanism movement and reveals methodological links of transhumanism with other branches of philosophy and science. The author identifies the preconditions for the appearance of transhumanism, both objective (economic) and ideological ones. The paper provides a classification of transhumanism branches according to the political programs they are based on and a short description of each branch: libertarian transhumanism (including extropianism), democratic transhumanism, techno-progressivism, and left-wing transhumanism. The main emphasis is put on the self-presentation of the authors who think of themselves as transhumanists, on their attitude toward each other and on the criticism of transhumanism thought. It is concluded that transhumanism should be considered one of the possible manifestations of the socio-political reaction to the development of new technologies capable of transforming the human nature in a rather radical way. For further analysis of certain ideas of transhumanism (including ethical and socio-economic), it is necessary to take into account its prerequisites and the connection with modern philosophical and scientific discussions.

Keywords: transhumanism, techno-progressivism, posthuman, transhuman, humanism, bioethics, ethics of science, NBIC-technologies, extropianism, libertarianism, democratic transhumanism, political philosophy.

References

Bailey R. (2005). Trans-Human Expressway: Why libertarians will win the future. Reason. 2005. May 11. Available at: http://reason.com/archives/2005/05/11/trans-human-expressway (accessed 30.07.2018).

Barbrook R. (2000).Cyber-Communism: How the Americans Are Superseding Capitalism in Cyberspace. Science as Culture. Vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 5–40. DOI: 10.1080/095054300114314.

Barbrook, R. and Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian Ideology. Science as Culture. Vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 44–72.

Belyaletdinov, R.R. (2014). Pochemu transgumanizm formiruet obraz biotekhnologiy? [Why transhumanism forms the image of biotechnologies?]. Rabochie Tetradi Po Bioetike. Vyp. 18: Chelovek — NBIC mashina(filosofsko-antropologicheskie i bioeticheskie issledovaniya) [Workbooks on bioethics. Iss. 18: Human — NBIC machine (philosophical-anthropological and bioethical research)]. Moscow, MSH Publ., pp. 18–27.

Bezkhmelnov, V.D. (2016). Transgumanizm: Tekhnologicheskoe Neravenstvo [Transhumanism: The Technological Inequality]. Molodezhnyy nauchno-tekhnicheskiy vestnik [The scientific and technical bulletin of youth]. No. 7. Available at: http://sntbul.bmstu.ru/doc/844505.html (accessed 23.07.2018).

Bostrom, N. (2005). A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology. Vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 1– 25.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 415 p.

Bostrom, N. and Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 15, iss. 3, pр. 311–341. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5.

Carrico, D. (2009). Condensed Critique of Transhumanism. Amor Mundi. Available at: https://amormundi.blogspot.com/2009/01/condensed-critique-of-transhumanism.html (accessed 30.07.2018).

Carrico, D. (2013). Futurological Discourses and Posthuman Terrains. Existenz. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47–63. Available at: https://existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8-2Carrico.pdf (accessed 30.07.2018).

Carrico, D. (2005). Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia. The Technoprogressive. Available at: http://technoprogressive.blogspot.com/2006/08/technoprogressivism-beyond.html (accessed 30.07.2018).

Dvorsky, G. (2008). Future Risks and the Challenge to Democracy. Sentient Developments. Dec. 22. Available at: http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/12/future-risks-and-challenge-to-democracy.html (accessed: 15.06.2018).

Dyomin, I.V. (2014). Russkiy kosmizm v kontekste sovremennoy tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii [Russian Cosmism in the Context of Modern Technogenic Civilization]. Samara: Samara Academy for the Humanities, 100 p.

Galton, F. (1875). Nasledstvennost talanta. Zakony i posledstviya [Hereditary Genius, its Laws and Conseguences]. Saint Petersburg : Znanie Publ., 319 p.

Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge: Westview Press, 294 p.

Huxley, J. (1957). New Bottles for New Wine. London: Chatto & Windus, 320 р.

Istvan, Z. (2017). Why I’m Running for California Governor as a Libertarian. Newsweek. Dec. 2. Available at: http://www.newsweek.com/zoltan-istvan-california-governor-libertarian-555088 (accessed: 15.07.2018).

Itskov, D.I. (2013). Globalnoe buduschee i obschestvennoe dvizhenie «Rossiya 2045» [Global Future and the Social Movement «Russia 2045»]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophy Sciences]. No. 8, pp. 5–10.

Kaygorodov, P.V. (2014). Transgumanizm: Diskussionnye Aspekty Kontseptsii [Transhumanism: Discussion Aspects of the Concept]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals]. No. 4, vol. 2, pp. 28–33.

Letov, O.V. (2009). Trasngumanizm i etika [Transhumanism and Ethics]. Sotsialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvenaya i zarubezhnaya literatura Seriya 3: Filosofiya [Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 3: Philosophy]. No. 2, pp. 54–102.

Manifest Rossiyskogo Transgumanisticheskogo Dvizheniya [Russian Transhumanism Movement Manifesto]. Available at: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/10/8/ (accessed 23.07.2018).

Maslov, V.M. (2013). Istoriko-filosofskoe vvedenie v postchelovecheskoe [Historico-Philosophical Introduction To Posthuman]. Fundamentalnye Issledovaniya [Fundamental research]. No. 10(13), pp. 3033–3038.

More, M. (1992). The Extropian Principles. Extropy. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–8.

More, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Transhumanism. The Transhumanist Reader. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3–17. DOI: 10.1002/9781118555927.ch1.

More, M. (1990). Transhumanism: Toward a Futurist Philosophy. Extropy, Institute of Extropy, Vol. 6, pр. 6–12.

Polyakova, O.V. (2015). Sotsialnye praktiki rossiyskogo transgumanizma [Transhumanism in Russia: Social Activities]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. No. 8–9, pp. 154–162.

Reynolds, G. (2006). An Army of Davids: How Markets and Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 304 р.

Rybakov, O.Yu. and Tihonova, S.V. (2013). Transgumanizm Maksa Mora: Avtarkiya i Otchuzhdenie [Transhumanism of Max Mor: Autarky And Alienation]. Filosofiya Prava [Philosophy of Low]. No. 3, pp. 56–60.

Sokolova, S.N. (2015). On Some Problems Of Philosophy In The Context Of Human Technologisation Prospects [O Nekotorykh Zadachakh Filosofii v Kontekste Perspektiv Tekhnologizatsii Cheloveka]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Tula State University Herald. Human Science]. No. 1, pp. 19–30.

Technoprogressive Declaration: «Transvision 2014» (2014). Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Nov. 22. Available at: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/tpdec2014 (accessed 30.07.2018).

Transhumanist Declaration (2005). Humanity+, World Transhumanist Association. Available at: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/ (accessed 30.07.2018).

Transhumanist FAQ (2016–2018). Humanity+, World Transhumanist Association. Available at: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-faq/ (accessed 30.07.2018).

Received 30.07.2018

For citation:

Gaishun R.N. Essence, prerequisites and self-identification of transhumanism movement // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 3. P. 352–363. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-352-363