DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-364-374
On the problem of freedom of the individual as a basic condition for the formation of civil society
Aigul K. Bektanova
Ph.D. in Political Science, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy
Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University of B.N. Yeltsin,
44, Kievskaya str., Bishkek, 720000, Kyrgyz Republic;
e-mail: bektanovaa@mail.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-9695-150X
The task of forming a civil society is relevant all over the post-Soviet space. As is known, the key subject of civil society is a person. The main feature of an individual in civil society is freedom, as understood in all its aspects. The article deals with the problem of individual freedom in terms of the concepts of «negative» and «positive» freedom and affirms that genuine civil freedom is an inseparable unity of both its external determinants and internal ones. It is noted that, on the one hand, the freedom of the individual in civil society necessarily implies its relative independence from external influence, but, on the other hand, it is impossible without an inner spiritual willingness to act consciously and sensibly without infringing on the interests and rights of others, without understanding that everyone should be responsible for their actions. The paper pays particular attention to the problems of spiritual, and, first of all, intellectual freedom, and justifies the thesis that the problem of the individual intellectual freedom is relevant not only for countries moving to democracy, but also for developed democracies of the West. The problem is not only and not so much how and where from to get information, but how the information obtained affects consciousness and behavior of the individual, and whether it contributes to the formation of his civic consciousness. Considering the problem of freedom in the Kyrgyz society and stressing that the Kyrgyz have managed to preserve their ethnic independence to this day precisely because of their steady striving for freedom, the author comes to the conclusion that freedom for nomads acted as a kind of dichotomy between external and internal freedom and lack of freedom. The article points to the peculiarity of the freedom phenomenon interpretation in modern Kyrgyzstan society, where for many people it is associated with anarchy, hopelessness and permissiveness. However, the real freedom of the individual in civil society is impossible without understanding that «the freedom of one person ends where freedom of another begins», that there is no absolute freedom, and it is always relative and closely related to the responsibility and consciousness of the individual.
Keywords: civil society, personality, freedom, «negative freedom», «positive freedom», intellectual freedom, civil freedom, responsibility.
References
Akmataliev, A.A. (2009). Sistema tsennostey sovremennogo kyirgyizstanskogo obschestva: opyit sotsiologicheskogo analiza [The system of values of modern Kyrgyz society: the experience of sociological analysis]. Bishkek. Ayat Publ., 136 p.
Arendt, H. (2014). Chto est svoboda? [What is freedom?]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. No. 4, pp. 32–49.
Berlin, I. (1998). Dve kontseptsii svobodyi [Two concepts of freedom]. Sovremennyiy liberalism [Modern liberalism]. Moscow, pp. 19–43.
Bokoshev, Zh. (1996). Grazhdanskoe obschestvo i chelovecheskoe «Ya» [Civil society and the human «I»]. Mat. nauch.-teor. konf. «Postroenie grazhdanskogo obschestva» [Mat. scientific-theor. Conf. «Building a Civil Society»]. Bishkek, pp. 18–20.
Chernova, T.G. (2014). O sootnoshenii svobodyi i neobhodimosti [On the relations between freedom and necessity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 2(18), pp. 20–24.
Chernova, T.G. (2018). Svoboda i otvetstvennost kak suschnostnyie silyi cheloveka [Freedom and responsibility as the essential forces of man]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sotsiologiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 1. pp. 45–52. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-1-45-52
Diligenskiy, G.G. (1999). Individualizm staryiy i novyiy (Lichnost v postsovetskom obschestve) [Individualism old and new (Personality in post-Soviet society)]. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political research]. No. 3. pp. 5–15.
Fergyuson, A. (2000). Opyit istorii grazhdanskogo obschestva [Experience of the history of civil society]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 389 p.
Filatova, O.G. (2010). Blogi i SMI, grazhdanskaya i traditsionnaya zhurnalistika:sootnoshenie ponyatiy [Blogs and mass media, civil and traditional journalism: the relation of concepts]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 9. Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika [Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University. Series 9. Philology. Oriental studies. Journalism]. No. 4. pp. 281–287.
Habermas, J. (1995). Demokratiya. Razum. Nravstvennost: Moskovskie lektsii i intervyu [Democracy. Mind. Morality: Moscow lectures and interviews]. Moscow, Kamp Publ., 245 p.
Indeks doveriya naseleniya (2018) [The population confidence index]. National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Available at: http://www.stat.kg/ru/indeks-doveriya-naseleniya/ (accessed 25.03.2018).
Kant, I. (1966). Ideya vseobshchey istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane [Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose]. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Oeuvre: in 6 vols]. Moscow: Mysl Publ., vol. 6. pp. 5–23.
Koltsova, N.V. (2005). Problema svobodyi v kochevyih sotsiumah Tsentralnoy Azii: traditsii i sovremennost [The problem of freedom in nomadic societies of Central Asia: traditions and modernity]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Altai State University]. No. 4. pp. 23–27.
Kyirgyizstan buzyaschiy. 4 075 aktsiy protesta proshlo v Kyirgyizstane za poslednie chetyire s nebolshim goda [Kyrgyzstan is a buzzard. 4 075 protest actions took place in Kyrgyzstan in the last four and a half years]. Available at: URL: http://www.stanradar.com/news/full/9470-kyrgyzstan-buzjaschij-4-075-aktsij-protesta-proshlo-v-kyrgyzstane-za-poslednie-chetyre-s-nebolshim-goda.html?page=25 (accessed 03.04.2018).
Motroshilova, N.V. (2009). O sovremennom ponimanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva [On the modern understanding of civil society]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of philosophy]. No. 6, pp. 12–32.
Mukasov, S.M. (1999). Traditsii sotsialno-filosofskoy myisli v duhovnoy kulture kyirgyizskogo naroda [Traditions of socio-philosophical thought in the spiritual culture of the Kyrgyz people]. Bishkek, Ilim Publ., 226 p.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2016). Vosstanie mass [The Revolt of the Masses]. Moscow, AST Publ., 256 p.
Saharov, A.D. (1990). Razmyishleniya o progresse, mirnom sosuschestvovanii i intellektualnoy svobode [Reflections on progress, peaceful coexistence and intellectual freedom]. Voprosyi filosofii [Issuess of philosophy]. No. 2, pp. 4–25.
Sartori, G. (1973). Democratic Theory. Westport: Greenwood Press, 479 р.
Spinoza B. (1957). Bogoslovsko-politicheskiy traktat [A Theologico-Political Treatise]. Izbrannyie proizvedeniya: v 2 t. [Selected works: in 2 vols]. Moscow. Gospolitizdat Publ., vol. 2. pp. 5–284.
Stamova, R.D. (2009). Lichnost v usloviyah transformatsii obschestva: sotsialno-filosofskiy analiz: avtoreferat dis. … d-ra filos. nauk [Personality in the conditions of the transformation of society: socio-philosophical analysis: Abstract of D.Sc. dissertation]. Bishkek, 51 p.
Taylor, Ch. (1979). What’s Wrong With Negative Liberty. The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isaiah Berlin. Oxford. Oxford University Press, pp. 175–193.
Urmanbetova, Zh.K. (2016). Traditsionnyie nomadyi Tsentralnoy Azii i sovremennyie tsifrovyie kochevniki [Traditional nomads of Central Asia and modern digital nomads]. Mater. conf. «Connect-Universum» [Proceedings of conf. «Connect-Universum»] Available at: http://connect-universum.tsu.ru/blog/connectuniversum2014_ru/967.html (accessed 12.02.2018).
Uroven korruptsii v Kyrgyzstane sravnyalsya s urovnem Rossii (2018) [The level of corruption in Kyrgyzstan is equal to that of Russia]. Kaktus.media. Feb. 22. Available at: URL: https://kaktus.media/doc/370753_yroven_korrypcii_v_kyrgyzstane_sravnialsia_s_yrovnem_rossii.html (accessed 16. 05. 2018).
Viroli, M. (2014). Svoboda slug [Freedom of servants]. Moscow, Dom Vyisshey shkolyi ekonomiki Publ,. 150 p.
Vneshniy dolg Kyrgyzstana prevysil 60 % VVP (2017) [Kyrgyzstan’s external debt has exceeded 60% of GDP]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7jR1x7OqNo (accessed 21.06.2018).
Vnutripoliticheskaya situatsiya v Kyrgyzstane (2018) [Internal political situation in Kyrgyzstan]. Available at: http://polit-asia.kz/ru/analytics/policy/2219-vnutripoliticheskaya-situatsiya-v-kyrgyzstane (accessed 21.06.2018).
Received 06.07.2018
For citation:
Bektanova A.K. On the problem of freedom of the individual as a basic condition for the formation of civil society // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 3. P. 364–374. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-3-364-374