DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-4-586-593
Theory of mind and symbolic functions in different activities of preschoolers: age specificity*
Natalya A. Koroleva
Ph.D. Student, Researcher of the Laboratory
of Developmental Psychology of the Subject
in the Normal and Post-traumatic States
Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences,
13, Yaroslavskaya st., Moscow, 129366, Russia;
e-mail: koroleava.n@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-6160
Anna Yu. Ulanova
Ph.D. in Psychology, Researcher of the Laboratory
of Developmental Psychology of the Subject
in the Normal and Post-traumatic States
Institute of Psychology of Russian Academyьof Sciences,
13, Yaroslavskaya str., Moscow, 129366, Russia;
e-mail: rachugina@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-6774
The article deals with the problem of correlation between the mental world understanding (the approach of the «theory of mind») and symbolic functions in preschool age. Both symbolic functions and the theory of mind are based on the capacity for mental representation, necessary to separate reality from internal representations, as well as to manage them and to plan one’s own behavior. This paper presents the results of research on age specificity in the development of individual aspects of symbolic functions and their relationship with the theory of mind at different stages of development. Symbolic functions are studied in three main types of preschoolers’ activities: pretend play, drawing and communication. We developed and tested methods for each of the activities, which allowed us to give a comprehensive assessment of the corresponding abilities in children aged from 3 to 6 years old. The analysis was conducted on a sample of 110 respondents. The results showed differences between indicators of the symbolic functions development in different types of activities in groups characterized by different levels of the theory of mind. The number of connections between the theory of mind and indicators of the symbolic functions development increases at the age of six. The greatest number of connections was found when assessing the understanding of false belief, which is a key marker of the theory of mind. We also found a tendency to later incorporation of the theory of mind into the understanding of symbolic means than into the use. In general, the data allows us to combine previously scattered ideas about the manifestation of symbolic functions in different types of activities and present the specificity of their changes during the development from a low to a high level of the theory of mind.
Keywords: theory of mind, false belief, symbolic functions, game, drawing, communication, preschool age.
References
Astington, J.W. and Jenkins, J.M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition & Emotion. Vol. 9, iss. 2–3, pp. 151–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409006
Astington, J.W. and Baird, J.A. (eds.) (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 368 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001
Bloom, P. and Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children’s naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science. Vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 200–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00038
Browne, C.A. and Woolley, J.D. (2001). Theory of mind in children’s naming of drawings. Journal of Cognition and Development. Vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 389–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0204_3
Freeman, N.H. and Sanger, D. (1995). Commonsense aesthetics of rural children. Visual Arts Research. Vol. 21(2), pp. 1–10.
Ganea, P.A., Lillard, A.S. and Turkheimer, E. (2004). Preschooler’s understanding of the role of mental states and action in pretense. Journal of Cognition and Development. Vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 213–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0502_3
Keskin, B. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind, symbolic transformations in pretend play, and children’s social competence: Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation]. Florida State University database. Available at: https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:181494/datastream/PDF/view (accessed 23.07.2019).
Koroleva, N.A. and Sergienko, E.A. (2017). Genezis sootnosheniya modeli psikhicheskogo i simvolicheskikh funktsiy v doshkol’nom vozraste [Genesis of the relation between the theory of mind and symbolic functions of preschoolers]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological Studies]. Vol.10, no. 52, Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2017v10n52/1408-koroleva52.html (accessed 23.07.2019).
Koroleva, N.A. and Ulanova, A.Yu. (2018). Model’ psikhicheskogo i simvolicheskie funktsii v raznykh vidakh deyatel’nosti u detey 3–6 let [Theory of mind and symbolic functions in different kinds of activity in children 3–6 years]. Tret’ya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya «Psikhologiya sostoyaniy cheloveka: aktual’nye i prikladnye problemy» [3rd International Scientific Conference «Psychology of Human Conditions: Actual Theoretical and Applied Problems»]. Kazan, pp. 258–261.
Lillard, A.S., Lemer, M., Hopkins, E. et al. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychological bulletin. Vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029321
Lillard, A.S. (1998). Playing with a theory of mind. Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood education, ed. by O.N. Saracho, B. Spodek. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 11–33.
Lillard, A.S. (2001). Pretend play as twin earth: A social-cognitive analysis. Developmental Review. Vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 495–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2001.0532
Luquet, G.H. (1927). Le dessin enfantin [Children’s drawings]. Paris: Alcan Publ., 260 p.
Nielsen, M. and Dissanayake, C. (2000). An investigation of pretend play, mental state terms and false belief understanding: In search of a metarepresentational link. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. Vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 609–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165887
Piaget, J. (1969). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Prosveschenie Publ., 659 p.
Sergienko, E.A., Lebedeva, E.I. and Prusakova, O.A. (2009). Model’ psikhicheskogo kak osnova stanovleniya ponimaniya sebya i drugogo v ontogeneze cheloveka [Theory of mind as the basis of an understanding of self and other in the ontogenesis of man]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 415 p.
Slaughter, V. and De Rosnay, M. (eds.) (2016). Theory of mind development in context. London: Routledge Publ., 182 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749181
Ulanova, A.Yu. and Sergienko, E.A. (2015). Informatsionnaya uspeshnost’ kommunikatsii na raznykh etapakh razvitiya modeli psikhicheskogo [Informational success of communication at different stages of theory of mind development]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–72.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1984). Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. [Collected works: in 6 vols]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., vol. 6. 400 p.
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition. Vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 103–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
Received 01.11.2019
For citation:
Koroleva N.A., Ulanova A.Yu. [Theory of mind and symbolic functions in different activities of preschoolers: age specificity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»], 2019, issue 4, pp. 586–593 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-4-586-593
* Исследование выполнено при поддержке РФФИ, грант № 17-06-00068.