DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-541-549
Correlation of cope-strategies, locus of control and motivation of achievement at managers
Oleg V. Kropovnitsky
Ph.D. Student of the Department of General and Social Psychology,
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla;
3a, October revolution str., Ufa, 450008, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia;
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Management and Social Psychology,
Bashkir Academy of Public Administration and Management
under the Auspices of the Republic of Bashkortostan,
40, Zaki Validi str., Ufa, 450057, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia;
e-mail: olegkrop@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-1504
The article focuses on the theoretical and empirical analysis of the concepts of coping strategy, locus of control (internality-externality), and achievement motivation. Different points of view on coping strategies are considered, as well as achievement motivation and internality as professionally important characteristics of managers of the real sector of the economy. The structure of the interrelation between socio-psychological characteristics and coping strategies of managers is revealed. The correlations between coping strategies, locus of control, and achievement motivation have been studied. The results of the study of the relationship between coping strategies, locus of control and achievement motivation among managers made it possible to draw the following conclusions. Firstly, the higher the level of motivation for success, the greater the likelihood is that a person will use such coping strategies as planning of a solution to the problem, positive reassessment and problem-oriented coping. Secondly, the higher the level of motivation for avoiding failures, the more likely it is that a person, in the process of coping, will resort to such strategies as distancing, escape-avoidance, emotionally-oriented coping. Thirdly, the higher the level of the internal locus of control, the greater the probability of using such coping strategies as problem-solving planning, positive reassessment, and problem-oriented coping. Finally, the higher the level of the external locus of control, the greater the likelihood is of using such coping strategies as distancing, flight-avoidance, emotionally-oriented coping.
Keywords: coping strategy, achievement motivation, internality, externality, locus of control, responsibility, adaptability, disadaptation, managers.
References
Antsyferova, L.I. (1994). Lichnost v trudnykh zhiznennykh usloviyakh: pereosmyslivanie, preobrazovanie situatsii i psikhologicheskaya zaschita [Personality in difficult living conditions: re-thinking, transformation of situations and psychological defense]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–19.
Cohen F. (1991). Measurement of coping. Stress and Coping: An Anthology, ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. New York, pp. 228–244. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-197309000-00002.
Gordeeva, T.O. (2002). Motivatsiya dostizheniya: teorii, issledovaniya, problemy [Motivation of achievement: theory, research, problems]. Sovremennaya psikhologiya motivatsii / pod red. D.A. Leonteva [Modern psychology of motivation, ed. by D.A. Leont’ev]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., pp. 47–102.
Kryukova, T. L. (2010). Metody izucheniya sovladayuschego povedeniya: tri koping-shkaly [Methods of studying coping behavior: three copy-scales]. Kostroma: KSU named after N.A. Nekrasova Publ., Avantitul Publ., 64 p.
Kudashev, A.R. (2015). Dialogicheskie i kommunikatsionnye kompetentsii menedzherov: sotsialno-psikhologicheskie aspekty [Dialogic and communication competence of managers: socio-psychological aspects]. Mezhdunarodniy nauchno-prakticheskiy seminar «Psikhologija dialoga i mir cheloveka» [International scientific-practical seminar «Psychology of dialogue and the world of man»]. No. 1(33), pp. 63–69.
Lazarus, R.S. and Folkman, S. (1991). The concept of coping. Stress and Coping: An Anthology, ed. by A. Monat, R.S. Lazarus. New York, pp. 189–206. DOI: 10.1017/s0141347300015019.
McClelland, D. et al. (1976). The achievement motive. New York, 386 p. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139878289.009.
Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305067.001.0001.
Muzdybaev, K. (1938). Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of responsibility] Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 240 p.
Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (1997). «Coping behavior» v sisteme ponyatiy psihologii lichnosti [«Coping behavior» in the system of concepts of personality psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 20–30.
Raygorodskiy, D.Ya. (ed.). (2001). Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy [Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests]. Samara: BAHRAH-M Publ., 672 p.
Rean, A.A. (1998). Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya kontseptsii lokusa kontrolya lichnosti [Problems and perspectives of development of the concept of the locus of personality control]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal]. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 3–11.
Rean, A.A. (1999). Psihologiya izucheniya lichnosti [Psychology of the study of personality]. St. Petersburg: V.L. Mihaylov’s Publ., 288 с.
Rean A.A., Kudashev A.R. and Baranov A.A. (ed.). (2006). Psikhologiya adaptatsii lichnosti. Analiz. Teoriya. Praktika [Psychology of personality adaptation. Analysis. Theory. Practice]. St. Petersburg: PRAYM-EVROZNAK Publ., 479 p.
Rotter, G.В. (1966). Generalized expectances for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs. Vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–28. DOI: 10.1037/h0092976.
Volkova, N.V. (2004). Coping strategies kak uslovie formirovaniya identichnosti [Coping strategies as a condition for the formation of identity]. Mir psikhologii [The World of Psychology]. No. 2(38), pp. 119–124.
Received 08.02.2018
For citation:
Kropovnitsky O.V. Correlation of cope-strategies, locus of control and motivation of achievement at managers // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 4. P. 541–549. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-4-541-549