Peculiarities of moral sphere of architecture and construction students in innovative situations
Russian version of the article
Issue 1 (25) 2016
DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2016-1-84-91
PECULIARITIES OF MORAL SPHERE OF ARCHITECTURE
AND CONSTRUCTION STUDENTS IN INNOVATIVE SITUATIONS
Artemyeva Veronika Alievna
PhD. in Psychology, Docent, Associate Professor
of Department of Organization Management
Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering,
4, 2-Krasnoarmeyskaya str., Saint-Petersburg, 190005, Russia;
e-mail: nika.artemeva@gmail.com
Participants of innovative process should constantly make the choice concerning ethical standards of human relations as each innovation so, or otherwise, concerns a material, social or psychological state of the participating. Violation of ethical standards at any stage of an innovative cycle can bring to difficult situations, even to tragic consequences. The paper describes the socio-psychological characteristics of decision-making in situations of moral choice of the person involved in the innovation process in different social roles: a creator of innovations; a manager who is engaged in introduction of innovations and a performer, implementing innovations. The technique of an assessment of psychological features of a moral choice in the situations connected with innovative process is offered.
Keywords: the moral orientation; innovative process; decision-making in a situation of a moral choice.
References
- Artem’eva V.A. [Methods of studying peculiarities of moral consciousness of innovative personality]. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov [Herald of civil engineers]. 2015, no 1(48), pp. 256–263. (In Russian).
- Artem’eva V.A. [Psychological aspects of innovative projects implementation]. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov [Herald of civil engineers]. 2013, no 6(41), pp. 252–258. (In Russian).
- Veselova E.K. [Moral sphere of personality studying method]. Diagnostika zdorov’ya. Psihologicheskij praktikum [Health diagnostics. Psychological practical work]. Saint Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2007, 950 p. (In Russian).
- Veselova E.K. [Moral aspects of professionalism formation of higher education students]. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-practicheskoj konferentsii «Pedagogicheskoe prostranstvo vuza: tehnologii, smysly, tsennosti»[Proceedings of All-Russia scientific and research conference «Higher educational institutions pedagogic space: technologies, senses, values»]. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Publ., 2012, pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
- Veselova E.K., Artem’eva V.A. [«Innovative personality»: moral and psychologic aspects]. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov [Herald of civil engineers]. 2014, no 4(45), pp. 128–133. (In Russian).
- Zhuravlev A.L., Kuprejchenko A.B. Nravstvenno-psihologicheskaya regulyatsiya ekonomicheskoj aktivnosti [Moral and psychologic regulation of economic activity]. Moscow, Psychology Institiute of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2003, 436 p. (In Russian).
- Psihologiya nravstvennosti [Psychology of morality]. Moscow, Psychology Institiute of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2010, 508 p. (In Russian).
- Tokareva G.A. Psihologicheskie aspekty nravstvennogo komponenta professional’noj deyatel’nosti menedzhera: dis. … kand. psihol. nauk [Psychological aspects of moral component of manager’s professional activity: Dissertation for procuring of degree of candidate of psychological sciences]. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Publ., 2006, 134 p. (In Russian).
- Hachatryan N.G. [Methodological prerequisits for spirituality studying]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological journal]. 2011, no 1(5), pp. 14–18. (In Russian).
- McDougall W.An Introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen & Co, 1908. 355 p. (In English).
The date of the manuscript receipt 14.11.2015
Please cite this article in English as:
Artemyeva V.A. Peculiarities of moral sphere of architecture and construction students in innovative situations // Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2016. Iss. 1(25). P. 84–91.