DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-404-417

Methodological features of substantial explanation in contemporary materialism

Yuri V. Loskutov
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy

Perm State University,
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990, Russia;
e-mail: yuri-loskutov@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-5931

In the paper, the content of the concept of substance is defined; the relevance of substantial explanation in philosophical and general scientific methodology of modern materialism is considered; the methodological features of substantial explanation are analyzed. Among these features are the choice of dialectics as general methodology for deriving theoretical ideas about substance (as opposed to the inductive approach and ideas about pramatter), the relations between the universal substance and special substances, the consideration of substance as an absolute reality, the actual indicators of substance in the context of post-nonclassical scientific rationality, the development of substantial explanation from the concrete to the abstract and vice versa (including the problem of the ontological and epistemological «cell»), as well as the substratum approach and the definition of substantial attribute. The concept of substantial attribute is introduced, which is the procedural basis for the self-reproduction of a form of matter or of the matter as a whole. This concept expresses a process without which this or that substance could not be the cause of itself, i.e. the substance. For an infinite material substance, self-development is a substantial attribute, but in each particular material substance it has specific features corresponding to the level of complexity of the substance. In this regard, different types of substantial attributes are identified in the structure of the main forms of matter: in the physical world — a self-sustaining thermonuclear reaction, in the chemical world — autocatalysis, in the biological world — autopoiesis, in the social world — labor. Thus, with the help of the above aspects, the paper substantiates the thesis that modern materialism, coupled with dialectics, creates a number of important methodological prerequisites for substantial explanation to be used not only as a philosophical but also as a general scientific method.

Keywords: matter, substance, substantial explanation, dialectics.

References

Akulov, V.L. (1982). Ob iskhodnykh printsipakh i metode postroeniya sistemy filosofskogo znaniya [On the initial principles and method of constructing a system of philosophical knowledge]. Problemy razvitiya sistemy kategoriy marksistskoy filosofii [Problems of developing a system of categories of Marxist philosophy]. Chelyabinsk: ChSPI Publ., pp. 34–49.

Askin, Ya.F. (1980). Printsip edinstva mira: mnogoobrazie aspektov [The principle of the unity of the world: diversity of aspects]. Printsip edinstva [Unity principle]. Saratov: SSU Publ., pp. 3–30.

Barg, O.A. (2014). Materiya kak substantsiya [Matter as a substance]. Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy]. Iss. 1(22), vol. 1, pp. 29–37.

Branskiy, V.P., Il’in, V.V. and Karmin, A.S. (1974). Dialekticheskoe ponimanie materii i ego metodologicheskaya rol’ [Dialectical understanding of matter and its methodological role]. Metodologicheskie aspekty materialisticheskoy dialektiki [Methodological aspects of materialist dialectics]. Leningrad: LSU Publ., pp. 13–54.

Erakhtin, A.V. (2018). Ontologiya v sisteme filosofskogo znaniya [Ontology in the system of philosophical knowledge]. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 328 p.

Gumnitskiy, G.N. and Zelentsova, M.G. (2014). Ob ontologicheskom ponimanii materii [On the ontological understanding of matter]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obschestva [Bulletin of the Russian Philosophical Society]. No. 4(72), p. 155–159.

Il’enkov, E.V. (1970). Substantsiya [Substance]. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya [Philosophical encyclopedia]. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya Publ., vol. 5, p. 151–154.

Ivanenko, A.I. (2014). Vozobnovlenie voprosa o bytii v leningradskoy ontologicheskoy shkole [The resumption of the question of being in the Leningrad ontological school]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University]. No. 4(60), vol. 3, pp. 206–209.

Kaydalov, V.A. (1982). Dialektiko-materialisticheskaya kontseptsiya samodvizheniya i ee sovremennye problemy [The dialectical-materialistic concept of self-movement and its modern problems]. Tomsk: TSU Publ., 201 p.

Kizima, V.V. (2009). Nachala metafiziki total’nosti [The beginnings of the metaphysics of totality]. Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Postclassics: philosophy, science, culture]. Saint Petersburg: Mir Publ., pp. 71–136.

Knyazeva, E.N. and Kurdyumov, S.P. (2002). Osnovaniya sinergetiki. Rezhimy s obostreniem, samoorganizatsiya, tempomiry [Foundations of synergetics. Modes with exacerbation, self-organization, tempo-worlds]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 414 p.

Koromyslov, V.V. (2007). Suschnost’ cheloveka i problema vseobschego: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [The essence of man and the problem of universal: dissertation]. Perm, 197 p.

Koryakin, V.V. (2008). Trud i edinyy, zakonomernyy istoricheskiy protsess [Labor and a single natural historical process]. Perm: PSU Publ., pt. 2, 339 p.

Kuchevskiy, V.B. (1983). Analiz kategorii «materiya» [Analysis of the category «matter»]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 255 p.

Kuchevskiy, V.B. (1993). Filosofskoe uchenie o bytii i substantsii [Philosophical doctrine of being and substance]. Moscow: MKU Publ., 126 p.

Lastochkin, A.V. (1980). Kategoriya «substrat» v marksistskoy filosofii [The category of «substrate» in Marxist philosophy]. Dialekticheskiy materializm kak sistema [Dialectical materialism as a system]. Perm: PSU Publ., pp. 139–145.

Lastochkin, A.V. (1990). Sotsial’naya forma materii [The social form of matter]. Sverdlovsk: UrSU Publ., 179 p.

Lastochkin, A.V. (1988). Substratnaya storona razvitiya kak sposoba suschestvovaniya materii [The substrate side of development as a way of existence of matter]. Nizshee i vysshee, sistemy i elementy v protsesse razvitiya [Lower and higher, systems and elements in the process of development]. Chelyabinsk: CSPU Publ., p. 4–12.

Lenin, V.I. (1968). Materializm i empiriokrititsizm [Materialism and Empirio-criticism]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. 5th ed. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol 18, p. 7–384.

Lenin, V.I. (1969). Konspekt knigi Gegelya «Nauka logiki» [Conspectus of Hegel’s «The Science of Logic»]. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 55 t. [Lenin V.I. Collected works: in 55 vols]. 5th ed. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 29, p. 77–218.

Maneev, A.K. (1980). Dvizhenie, protivorechie, razvitie [Movement, contradiction, development]. Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika Publ., 166 p.

Martynovich, S.F. (1980). Substantsiya, edinstvo, vzaimosvyaz’ [Substance, unity, relationship]. Printsip edinstva [Unity principle]. Saratov: SSU Publ., pp. 40–54.

Marx, K. (1960). Kapital. T. 1 [Capital: Critique of political economy. Vol. 1]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 23, 908 p.

Marx, K. (1968). Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 godov [Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 46, pt. 1, pp. 3–510.

Marx, K. (1974). Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 g. [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 50 t. [Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 50 vols]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., vol. 42, pp. 41–174.

Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (2001). Drevo poznaniya [The tree of knowledge]. Moscow: Progress–Traditsiya Publ., 224 p.

Orlov, V.V. (1985). Chelovek, mir, mirovozzrenie [Human, world, worldview]. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya Publ., 222 p.

Orlov, V.V. (1974). Materiya, razvitie, chelovek [Matter, development, human]. Perm: PSU Publ., 397 p.

Orlov, V.V. (2014). Kategoriya beskonechnosti v sisteme kategoriy nauchnoy filosofii [The category of infinity in the system of categories of scientific philosophy]. Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy]. Iss. 1(22), vol. 1, pp. 9–17.

Orlov, S.V. (1980). Kategoriya substantsii v dialektiko-materialisticheskoy kontseptsii materii: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Category of substance in the dialectical-materialistic concept of matter: dissertation]. Lenigrad, 207 p.

Orynbekov, M.S. (1975). Problema substantsii v filosofii i nauke [The problem of substance in philosophy and science]. Alma-Ata: Nauka Publ., 176 p.

Orynbekov, M.S. (1987). Substantsiya [Substance]. Dialekticheskaya logika: Kategorii sfery suschnosti i tselostnosti [Dialectical logic: Categories of the sphere of essence and integrity]. Alma-Ata: Nauka Publ., pp. 336–373.

Orynbekov, M.S. (1991). Substantsiya kak vnutrennee edinstvo razvivayuschikhsya tselostnykh sistem i printsip ikh poznaniya [Substance as an internal unity of developing integral systems and the principle of their knowledge]. Razvitie kak regulyativnyy printsip [Development as a regulatory principle]. Rostov-on-Don: RSU Publ., pp. 67–85.

Petrosyan, Yu.S. (2015). Voskhod i zakat idei substantsii [Sunrise and decline of the idea of substance]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Herald of Omsk University]. No. 4(78), pp. 68–74.

Selivanov, F.A. (2009). Absolyutnoe i otnositel’noe i moral’nye tsennosti [Absolute and relative and moral values]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obschestva [Bulletin of the Russian Philosophical Society]. No. 3(51), pp. 122–124.

Shapiro, O.Sh. (1998). Substantsii (suschnosti) prirody i obschestva. Vyp. 1 [Substances (essences) of nature and society. Iss. 1]. Maykop: ASU Publ., 167 p.

Shershunov, A.D. (1975). Kategorii istoricheskogo materializma v ikh vzaimosvyazi [Categories of historical materialism in their relationship]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 79 p.

Shirokanov, D.I. (1974). Dialektika poznaniya i kategoriya substantsii [The dialectic of knowledge and the category of substance]. Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika Publ., 208 p.

Tsann-Kaj-Si, F.V. (1973). Problema cheloveka v rabotakh Marksa 40-kh godov XIX veka [The problem of man in the works of Marx of the 40s of the 19th century]. Vladimir: VSPI Publ., 229 p.

Tugarinov, V.P. (1956). Sootnoshenie kategoriy dialekticheskogo materializma [Correlation of categories of dialectical materialism]. Leningrad: LSU Publ., 122 p.

Vyakkerev, F.F. and Orlov, S.V. (1981). Istoricheskie i logicheskie aspekty opredeleniya ponyatiya materii [Historical and logical aspects of the definition of matter]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences]. No. 6, pp. 41–48.

Zelentsova, M.G. (2001). Monisticheskaya paradigma filosofskogo ponimaniya mira i cheloveka: dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Monistic paradigm of philosophical understanding of the world and human: dissertation]. Ivanovo, 283 p.

Zhilina, V.A. (2009). Ontologicheskoe osnovanie ideologicheskikh protsessov razvertyvaniya ob’ektivirovannykh form mirovozzreniya [Ontological basis of the ideological processes of deployment of objectified forms of worldview]. Vestnik Yakutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Yakutsk State University]. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 112–117.

 

Received 01.07.2020

For citation:

Loskutov Yu.V. [Methodological features of substantial explanation in contemporary materialism]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2020, issue 3, pp. 404–417 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-404-417