DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-2-229-235

RELIGIOUS ARGUMENT IN PUBLIC SPHERE: TOLERATION AND IDENTITY^*

Aleksey V. Loginov
Ph.D. in Philosophy, Docent,
Associate Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin,
19, Mira str., Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia;
e-mail: alexeyloginov@urfu.ru
ORCID: 0000-0002-5554-5214

A number of widely discussed court verdicts recently delivered in Yekaterinburg to defend so called «religious feelings» (R. Sokolovsky case) or against the «atheistic claim» for the priest’s apology (N. Ryabchevsky case) turned our attention back to the questions: why is it so difficult to tolerate when it concerns religion? If not human rights, what are those principles our public debates should be governed by? The author tries to find some possibilities for toleration both in religious and in secular spheres of modern society. The author starts with classical definitions (P. Nicholson and D. Heyd) of what toleration is and how it works, then, based on A. Margalit’s description of religious pluralism compares key arguments for and against the very possibility of inner religious toleration. Having relocated the results into public sphere, the author wonders if the virtue of toleration should be kept there. The preliminary conclusion is that it depends on what kind of identity — «thick» or «thin» — communication processes in the society are based on. Hence, two education policies are explored in the last part of the paper: the first one is aimed at reducing any strong connection between self and group identity, and the second one is based on communitarian respect for socially constructed self (Ch. Taylor). The dilemma is not solved yet, and the author ends up with a suggestion to compare the way religion(s) is taught at schools in Russia and in at least Northern (according to RSF project plan) Europe to get more clear vision of the «constellation» of modernity that we are planning to achieve.

Keywords: toleration, conflict, identity, education, modernity.

References

Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T. (1995). Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow, Medium Publ., 323 p.

Coser, L. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict. New York, The Free Press, 188 p.

Gorshkov, M.K., Krumm, R., Petukhov, V.V. (ed.) (2011). Dvadtsat’ let reform glazami rossiyan: opyt mnogoletnikh sotsiologicheskikh zamerov [Twenty years of reforms in perception of the Russians: a case of long-term sociological studies]. Moscow, Ves’ Mir Publ., 328 p.

Heyd, D. (1996). Introduction. Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, ed. by D. Heyd. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 3–17.

Ignatova, M. Sud razreshil ekaterinburgskomu sviashenniku nazyvat’ Lenina Gitlerom [The Court allowed Ekaterinburg priest to name Lenin as Hitler]. Available at: https://www.e1.ru/news/spool/news_id-54255201.html (accessed 14.04.2018).

Izluchenko, T.V. (2013). Dialogichnost’ religioznogo soznaniya kak put’ k tolerantnosti svetskogo obschestva [Dialogism of religious consciousness as a way to tolerance of secular society]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokogiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 1(13), pp. 50–53.

Khomyakov, M. (2004). Religioznaya tolerantnost v multikulturnom obschestve: poisk novogo obosnovaniya [Religious toleration in multicultural society: toward new foundation]. Kul’turnye praktiki tolerantnosti v rechevoy kommunikatsii / pod red. N. Kupinoy, O. Mikhailovoy [Cultural practice of toleration in oral communication processes, ed. by N. Kupina, O. Mikhailova]. Ekaterinburg, UrSU Publ., pp. 378–407.

Khomyakov, M. (2003). Tolerantnost’ — paradoksal’naya cennost’ [Toleration: A Paradoxical Value]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology]. Vol. VI, no. 4, pp. 98–112.

Khomyakov, M. (2013). Toleration and respect: Historical instances and current problems. European Journal of Political Theory. Vol. 12(3), pp. 223–239. DOI: 10.1177/1474885112465247.

Loginov, A. (2013). Tolerantost’ — «za» i «protiv» [Toleration: pro et contra]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokogiya [Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology»]. Iss. 1(13), pp. 44–49.

Loginov, A. (2017). Vazmozhna li vnutrennyaya religioznaya tolerantnost’? [Is internal religious tolerance possible?] Izvestiya Ural’skogo Federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Obshchestvennye nauki [Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 3. Social and Political Sciences]. Vol. 12, no. 4(170), pp. 37–46.

Margalit, A. (1996). The Ring: on Religious Pluralism. Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, ed. by D. Heyd. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 147–157.

Menshikov, A.S. (2017). Svoboda sovesti i zashchita religioznykh chuvstv: prava cheloveka v context post-secularnoy epohi [Freedom of Conscience and Protection of Religious Feelings: Human Rights in the Context of Post-secular Modernity]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo Federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Obshchestvennye nauki [Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 3. Social and political sciences]. Vol. 12, no. 4(170), pp. 27–36.

Nicholson, P. (1985). Toleration as a Moral Ideal. Aspects of Toleration, ed. by J. Horton, S. Mendus. London, New York, Methuen, pp. 158–173.

Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia University Press, 435 p.

«Sokolovsky! Nichego svyatogo». Prigovor Verkh-Isetskogo rayonnogo suda Ekaterinburga [«Sokolovsky! Nothing Sacred». Local Court of Yekaterinburg city verdict]. Available at: https://zona.media/article/2017/05/17/sokolovsky-prigivor (accessed 24.04.2018).

Vorobiyova, I., Kruzhkova, O., Simonova, I. (2015). Sotsial’niy serfing: spetsifika tsennostnykh orientatsiy molodezhi v sovremennom obschestve [Social surfing: specific value orientations of youth in contemporary society]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia]. No. 5, pp. 45–50.

Wagner, P. (2008). Modernity as Experience and Interpretation. A New Sociology of Modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press, 297 p.

Received 25.04.2018

For citation:

Loginov A.V. Religious argument in public sphere: toleration and identity// Perm University Herald. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology». 2018. Iss. 2. P. 229–235. DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2018-2-229-235